On Sat, Oct 03, 2009 at 10:27:39PM +, Bjoern A. Zeeb wrote:
...
As we will try to keep the default in 8.x and 9.x to disallow user
mappings at virtual address 0, we are interested in further issues
that were not yet metnioned in either this thread or the Errata Notice.
quagga 0.99.15
On Monday 05 Oct 2009 00:28:20 you wrote:
maxpower are expressed as dBm.
Thanks for that and the pointers to get the channels right. A temporary
hack in net80211 was trivial and I can take my time with the ral end of
things. I believe Kip Macy was the last to look at ral in-depth, around the
I am not sure whether we dropped floppy support.
But I can imagine that the release candidates do not have floppies.
On Oct 4, 2009, at 1:54 PM, luca wrote:
hi,
I'm looking for the floppies images to install FreeBSD 8 on a PC
which can't boot from CDROM ; but the images are not available
Hi,
I've been struggling with watchdog timeouts in 7.1/7.2-RELEASE for the
past 6months too. It looks related.
I've tried to replace the hardware 3 times (2 different IBM x3755
chassis, one IBM x3650 chassis).
I tried first with onboard broadcom NICs (bce-based) PCIx-based, until
I had
At 12:47 PM 10/4/2009, Andre Albsmeier wrote:
On Sat, 03-Oct-2009 at 22:27:39 +, Bjoern A. Zeeb wrote:
On Sat, 3 Oct 2009, Andre Albsmeier wrote:
Hi,
On Sat, 03-Oct-2009 at 16:27:32 -0400, jhell wrote:
On Sat, 3 Oct 2009 14:42 -, Andre.Albsmeier wrote:
FYI,
after setting
On Oct 2, 2009, at 4:36 PM, Rudy wrote:
Today, I set net.inet.ip.fw.enable=0 and I'll see if that helps. I
have
a feeling that isn't related to the NIC at all, but I'm not sure what
else to try.
Just curious, have you tried (or are you using) device polling?
--
Robert Blayzor, BOFH
INOC,
On Mon, 5 Oct 2009, Mike Tancsa wrote:
Hi Mike,
Thanks for reporting the issue. People are aware of the problem now
and we'll try to present a solution within the next days for better
position-independent executable (PIE) handling.
Meanwhile there are multiple solutions for people
This posting just muddies the issue, first you talk about having a problem
that
involves Broadcom, ok, so post about that on something other than em :)
Then you make some references to hardware that you might have bought
but didn't, I'm not about debugging 'possible worlds problems' though so
On Sun, 4 Oct 2009 12:07 -0700, dougb@ wrote:
Bjoern A. Zeeb wrote:
On Sat, 3 Oct 2009, Andre Albsmeier wrote:
Hi,
On Sat, 03-Oct-2009 at 16:27:32 -0400, jhell wrote:
On Sat, 3 Oct 2009 14:42 -, Andre.Albsmeier wrote:
FYI,
after setting security.bsd.map_at_zero to 0 on 7.2-STABLE
Pawel Jakub Dawidek wrote:
On Mon, Sep 28, 2009 at 08:37:56PM +0200, Oliver Lehmann wrote:
Hi Pawel,
Pawel Jakub Dawidek wrote:
Does anything change between you upgrade from BETA3 and RC1? For example
gmirror was compiled into the kernel before and now is loaded as module
or
(Note: please keep me CC'd, as I am not subscribed to freebsd-stable)
Is it still possible with ZFS to panic a RELENG_7 amd64 box (kernel/world
from recent[1] source) with kmem map too small or similar conditions?
Why I ask:
Our production SQL/backup box kernel panic'd a couple days ago.
Hi Jack,
I'll comment your mail inline:
On Oct 5, 2009, at 6:57 PM, Jack Vogel wrote:
This posting just muddies the issue, first you talk about having a
problem that
involves Broadcom, ok, so post about that on something other than
em :)
I only meant to indicate that the problem might
Sorry, its a Monday morning, I was being kinda facetious, guess it didn't
work very well :) I apologize.
I know it must be annoying for you, its as much so for me when its something
I can't just fix because its not reproducible. So, I feel your pain.
Will try to restrain my Monday blues in the
On Mon, Oct 05, 2009 at 08:32:14PM +0200, Daniel Bond wrote:
What I need is useful advice/help. I never stated I needed a driver
developer.
I'd like to be able to run my favorite OS on cool hardware, in the
future, for a high-performing NFS-server, without problems like I've
Finally, while doing some comparisons, I realized that the motherboard
having the problem was _not_ the same as the others; it was similar, but
not identical.
This is a good piece of info. I can try swapping out the MB and see
what happens.
I do want to add: thank you Jack for all your help
Hmmm, I did have one of the drivers print more info at watchdog time, but I
just looked
and that's not em, time to add that I guess.
Since you're in the driver there isn't a huge amount of info that you can
print, it still
may not be enough to help.
BTW, I've always been somewhat dissatisfied
Hi.
I explained my opinion quite well (imo) a bit further down in my
previous email. I'm not sure what
to answer.
I don't necessarily think it's relevant for every computer running
sshd. I see a tendency to change
sshd port to 2022 and other port numbers. I'm not sure everyone doing
it
I have some code that tries to use pthread_cond_wait() and it's getting
back EPERM. Upon further investigation, here's what I've found:
When the app starts, libthr's _libpthread_init calls init_main_thread()
to set the thread id in struct pthread's tid.
The app opens a log file then calls
On Mon, 5 Oct 2009, Matthew Fleming wrote:
I have some code that tries to use pthread_cond_wait() and it's getting
back EPERM. Upon further investigation, here's what I've found:
When the app starts, libthr's _libpthread_init calls init_main_thread()
to set the thread id in struct pthread's
BTW, I've always been somewhat dissatisfied with the watchdog design and
think
its kinda flawed, I could try and make you an experimental with debug and
some
changes that you can try if you'd like.
I'm game -- it would be nice if the machine still reset the watchdog in
3 seconds and
20 matches
Mail list logo
