TB --- 2012-10-10 08:27:06 - tinderbox 2.9 running on freebsd-legacy2.sentex.ca
TB --- 2012-10-10 08:27:06 - FreeBSD freebsd-legacy2.sentex.ca 9.0-RELEASE
FreeBSD 9.0-RELEASE #0: Tue Jan 3 07:46:30 UTC 2012
r...@farrell.cse.buffalo.edu:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC amd64
TB --- 2012-10-10
CCing Benjamin Close as he ported wpi(4) driver to FreeBSD.
On Sat, Oct 06, 2012 at 01:09:11PM +0200, Victor Balada Diaz wrote:
Hello,
I'm trying to setup my wireless on FreeBSD 9.0-p3 amd64 and i get the
following
error:
wpi0: fatal firmware error
[...]
rc.conf config:
On 10/08/2012 22:16, Jakub Lach wrote:
FreeBSD/arm and FreeBSD/mips will be added soon!.
https://pub.allbsd.org/FreeBSD-snapshots/
As the last snapshot is from October 6, I infer that they use cvs/cvsup, with
the svn to cvs gateway down since this date ..
Claude Buisson
TB --- 2012-10-10 12:17:58 - tinderbox 2.9 running on freebsd-legacy2.sentex.ca
TB --- 2012-10-10 12:17:58 - FreeBSD freebsd-legacy2.sentex.ca 9.0-RELEASE
FreeBSD 9.0-RELEASE #0: Tue Jan 3 07:46:30 UTC 2012
r...@farrell.cse.buffalo.edu:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC amd64
TB --- 2012-10-10
Any questions and suggestions are welcome. Contact h...@freebsd.org.
But good catch, if your reasoning is indeed correct.
And for the record, they are NOT official snapshots.
--
View this message in context:
Jakub Lach jakub_l...@mailplus.pl wrote
in 1349873186577-5750838.p...@n5.nabble.com:
ja Any questions and suggestions are welcome. Contact h...@freebsd.org.
ja
ja But good catch, if your reasoning is indeed correct.
ja
ja And for the record, they are NOT official snapshots.
Migrating from CVS
TB --- 2012-10-10 16:12:23 - tinderbox 2.9 running on freebsd-legacy2.sentex.ca
TB --- 2012-10-10 16:12:23 - FreeBSD freebsd-legacy2.sentex.ca 9.0-RELEASE
FreeBSD 9.0-RELEASE #0: Tue Jan 3 07:46:30 UTC 2012
r...@farrell.cse.buffalo.edu:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC amd64
TB --- 2012-10-10
On 10/10/2012 16:07, Hiroki Sato wrote:
Jakub Lachjakub_l...@mailplus.pl wrote
in1349873186577-5750838.p...@n5.nabble.com:
ja Any questions and suggestions are welcome. Contact h...@freebsd.org.
ja
ja But good catch, if your reasoning is indeed correct.
ja
ja And for the record, they are
Thanks for information, and especially thanks for
providing snapshots- they are my primary source
(and for many) for fresh FreeBSD isos.
--
View this message in context:
http://freebsd.1045724.n5.nabble.com/FreeBSD-10-CURRENT-and-9-STABLE-snapshots-tp5749922p5750927.html
Sent from the
On 10/10/2012 14:46, Jakub Lach wrote:
Any questions and suggestions are welcome. Contact h...@freebsd.org.
But good catch, if your reasoning is indeed correct.
Honestly, my message was also a test about the current state of the svn to cvs
gateway. Is it down without nobody taking care ? or
On Wed, Oct 10, 2012 at 07:04:22PM +0200, Claude Buisson wrote:
As an addon, according to lists.freebsd.org, svn-ports have not been
updated since more than a day...
This is an unrelated problem, caused by machine upgrades/moves at our
main data center.
- the recently created
The second release candidate of the 9.1-RELEASE release cycle is now
available on the FTP servers for amd64, i386, ia64, powerpc, and
powerpc64. The MD5/SHA256 checksums are at the bottom of this message.
The ISO images and, for architectures that support it, the memory stick
images are
Hi,
Sorry for crossposting, but this would be really nice to be fixed in
the final release. I just installed one RC2 onto a XenServer 6.1 cluster
but cannot boot with XENHVM kernel. I started a thread on the
freebsd-xen list, which is here:
TB --- 2012-10-10 20:02:08 - tinderbox 2.9 running on freebsd-legacy2.sentex.ca
TB --- 2012-10-10 20:02:08 - FreeBSD freebsd-legacy2.sentex.ca 9.0-RELEASE
FreeBSD 9.0-RELEASE #0: Tue Jan 3 07:46:30 UTC 2012
r...@farrell.cse.buffalo.edu:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC amd64
TB --- 2012-10-10
On 08.10.2012 07:02, John-Mark Gurney wrote:
I recently put together a new machine w/ a SuperMicro H8SCM and an
AMD Opteron 4228 HE... I've having an issue where the clock on the
machine skips around... The wierd part is that it's very sudden when
it happens... ntp sometimes brings it back,
Sorry if I've misunderstood you, but how making second
unofficial repository forwards the case of having official one?
On the side, having void link on main page, like now is
worst option.
--
View this message in context:
On Wed, Oct 10, 2012 at 10:04 AM, Claude Buisson clbuis...@orange.fr wrote:
On 10/10/2012 14:46, Jakub Lach wrote:
Any questions and suggestions are welcome. Contact h...@freebsd.org.
But good catch, if your reasoning is indeed correct.
Honestly, my message was also a test about the current
On Wed, Oct 10, 2012 at 07:04:22PM +0200, Claude Buisson wrote:
And for the record, they are NOT official snapshots.
I know, but:
- there are no more official snapshots on freebsd.org
This is a problem, and for what it is worth (and as Mark mentioned in a
previous reply), the end goal is
On 11/10/2012 00:40, Glen Barber wrote:
This is a problem, and for what it is worth (and as Mark mentioned in a
previous reply), the end goal is official snapshots.
I think a lot of people will be wondering what's special about _your_
snapshots that they'll become official - why not just make
On Thu, Oct 11, 2012 at 12:47:32AM +0100, Bruce Cran wrote:
On 11/10/2012 00:40, Glen Barber wrote:
This is a problem, and for what it is worth (and as Mark mentioned in a
previous reply), the end goal is official snapshots.
I think a lot of people will be wondering what's special about
On Thu, 11 Oct 2012 01:33:57 +0200, Kevin Oberman kob6...@gmail.com
wrote:
On Wed, Oct 10, 2012 at 10:04 AM, Claude Buisson clbuis...@orange.fr
wrote:
- I had to install a complete VCS I have no (other) need of,
Unfortunate, but not hugely significant (Just a bit of disk space).
I
On Thu, Oct 11, 2012 at 02:02:40AM +0200, Michael Ross wrote:
- I had to install a complete VCS I have no (other) need of,
Unfortunate, but not hugely significant (Just a bit of disk space).
I think it is rather significant:
FWIW, you can compile the svn binary elsewhere, statically
On 10/11/2012 01:33, Kevin Oberman wrote:
On Wed, Oct 10, 2012 at 10:04 AM, Claude Buissonclbuis...@orange.fr wrote:
On 10/10/2012 14:46, Jakub Lach wrote:
Any questions and suggestions are welcome. Contact h...@freebsd.org.
But good catch, if your reasoning is indeed correct.
Honestly,
On 10/11/2012 01:40, Glen Barber wrote:
On Wed, Oct 10, 2012 at 07:04:22PM +0200, Claude Buisson wrote:
And for the record, they are NOT official snapshots.
I know, but:
- there are no more official snapshots on freebsd.org
This is a problem, and for what it is worth (and as Mark mentioned
On 10/11/2012 02:09, Glen Barber wrote:
On Thu, Oct 11, 2012 at 02:02:40AM +0200, Michael Ross wrote:
- I had to install a complete VCS I have no (other) need of,
Unfortunate, but not hugely significant (Just a bit of disk space).
I think it is rather significant:
FWIW, you can compile
On Wed, Oct 10, 2012 at 8:21 PM, Claude Buisson clbuis...@orange.fr wrote:
I can easily understand that developpers are happy to switch to new tools,
but
the question is: do FreeBSD developpers care a bit about non developpers,
and
FreeBSD developers are required to keep their development
On Thu, Oct 11, 2012 at 02:28:05AM +0200, Claude Buisson wrote:
- the recently created snapshots.glenbarber.us is much more limited
May I ask what it is that is limiting? If there is some limitation, I
certainly will do what I can to address it.
Right now, the limitations I am already
On Thu, Oct 11, 2012 at 02:34:56AM +0200, Claude Buisson wrote:
FWIW, you can compile the svn binary elsewhere, statically linked, and
save the dependency problem by copying the resulting binary around.
Lucky people who have an elsewhere.
And the static binary is as much bloated than
TB --- 2012-10-11 01:49:01 - tinderbox 2.9 running on freebsd-legacy2.sentex.ca
TB --- 2012-10-11 01:49:01 - FreeBSD freebsd-legacy2.sentex.ca 9.0-RELEASE
FreeBSD 9.0-RELEASE #0: Tue Jan 3 07:46:30 UTC 2012
r...@farrell.cse.buffalo.edu:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC amd64
TB --- 2012-10-11
Quoth Brandon Allbery allber...@gmail.com:
On Wed, Oct 10, 2012 at 8:21 PM, Claude Buisson clbuis...@orange.fr wrote:
I can easily understand that developpers are happy to switch to new tools,
but
the question is: do FreeBSD developpers care a bit about non developpers,
and
FreeBSD
TB --- 2012-10-11 05:48:04 - tinderbox 2.9 running on freebsd-legacy2.sentex.ca
TB --- 2012-10-11 05:48:04 - FreeBSD freebsd-legacy2.sentex.ca 9.0-RELEASE
FreeBSD 9.0-RELEASE #0: Tue Jan 3 07:46:30 UTC 2012
r...@farrell.cse.buffalo.edu:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC amd64
TB --- 2012-10-11
31 matches
Mail list logo
