Hajimu UMEMOTO wrote:
On Tue, 22 Nov 2005 12:06:12 -0800
Nate Lawson [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
nate Thank you for tracking this down. It is interesting that BIF is
nate heavyweight while BST is not. I guess that is expected behavior by OEMs
nate which only test on Windows and so not
Hi,
On Thu, 17 Nov 2005 11:24:16 -0500
Pierre-Luc Drouin [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
Ok, there is new development. I realized by playing with
debug.acpi.disabled=smbat, debug.acpi.disabled=smbat cmbat and
debug.acpi.disabled=cmbat, that my laptop battery is not a smbat,
but a cmbat. When I
Hajimu UMEMOTO wrote:
Hi,
On Thu, 17 Nov 2005 11:24:16 -0500
Pierre-Luc Drouin [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
Ok, there is new development. I realized by playing with
debug.acpi.disabled=smbat, debug.acpi.disabled=smbat cmbat and
debug.acpi.disabled=cmbat, that my laptop
Hajimu UMEMOTO wrote:
Hi,
On Thu, 17 Nov 2005 11:24:16 -0500
Pierre-Luc Drouin [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
Ok, there is new development. I realized by playing with
debug.acpi.disabled=smbat, debug.acpi.disabled=smbat cmbat and
debug.acpi.disabled=cmbat, that my laptop battery is not a smbat,
Hi,
On Tue, 22 Nov 2005 12:06:12 -0800
Nate Lawson [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
nate Thank you for tracking this down. It is interesting that BIF is
nate heavyweight while BST is not. I guess that is expected behavior by OEMs
nate which only test on Windows and so not everyone makes BIF simple.
Hajimu UMEMOTO wrote:
Hi,
On Tue, 22 Nov 2005 12:06:12 -0800
Nate Lawson [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
nate Thank you for tracking this down. It is interesting that BIF is
nate heavyweight while BST is not. I guess that is expected behavior by OEMs
nate which only test on
Hajimu UMEMOTO wrote:
Hi,
On Mon, 14 Nov 2005 12:40:36 -0500
Pierre-Luc Drouin [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
pldrouin Yep, smart battery is definately the problem. The performance of my
pldrouin laptop is back to normal when I remove the xfce4-battery-plugin.
pldrouin acpiconf -i loop
Hi,
On Mon, 21 Nov 2005 10:37:25 -0800
Nate Lawson [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
The cmbat has similar issue on some laptops. So, acpi_cmbat.c uses
cache for retrieval to reduce its influence, and its expiration
time is set by hw.acpi.battery.info_expire.
However, acpi_smbat.c doesn't use
Pierre-Luc Drouin wrote:
Nate Lawson wrote:
Pierre-Luc Drouin wrote:
Hajimu UMEMOTO wrote:
On Mon, 14 Nov 2005 12:40:36 -0500
Pierre-Luc Drouin [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
pldrouin Yep, smart battery is definately the problem. The
performance of my pldrouin laptop is back to normal when I
Nate Lawson wrote:
Pierre-Luc Drouin wrote:
Hajimu UMEMOTO wrote:
On Mon, 14 Nov 2005 12:40:36 -0500
Pierre-Luc Drouin [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
pldrouin Yep, smart battery is definately the problem. The
performance of my pldrouin laptop is back to normal when I remove
the
Hi,
On Mon, 14 Nov 2005 12:40:36 -0500
Pierre-Luc Drouin [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
pldrouin Yep, smart battery is definately the problem. The performance of my
pldrouin laptop is back to normal when I remove the xfce4-battery-plugin.
pldrouin acpiconf -i loop reproduces the problem for me too.
Hajimu UMEMOTO wrote:
Hi,
On Mon, 14 Nov 2005 12:40:36 -0500
Pierre-Luc Drouin [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
pldrouin Yep, smart battery is definately the problem. The performance of my
pldrouin laptop is back to normal when I remove the xfce4-battery-plugin.
pldrouin acpiconf
Pierre-Luc Drouin wrote:
Hajimu UMEMOTO wrote:
On Mon, 14 Nov 2005 12:40:36 -0500
Pierre-Luc Drouin [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
pldrouin Yep, smart battery is definately the problem. The
performance of my pldrouin laptop is back to normal when I remove the
xfce4-battery-plugin. pldrouin acpiconf
Nate Lawson wrote:
Pierre-Luc Drouin wrote:
Hajimu UMEMOTO wrote:
On Mon, 14 Nov 2005 12:40:36 -0500
Pierre-Luc Drouin [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
pldrouin Yep, smart battery is definately the problem. The
performance of my pldrouin laptop is back to normal when I remove
the
Pierre-Luc Drouin wrote:
Last friday I did a cvsup
src/buildworld/buildkernel/installkernel/installworld/mergemaster
on my laptop from 6.0-RELEASE to 6.0-STABLE and since the performance of my
laptop (Dell
Precision M70 with a Pentium M 2GHz) is not good. It behaves like if the bus
was
Ulrich Spoerlein wrote:
Pierre-Luc Drouin wrote:
Last friday I did a cvsup src/buildworld/buildkernel/installkernel/installworld/mergemaster
on my laptop from 6.0-RELEASE to 6.0-STABLE and since the performance of my laptop (Dell
Precision M70 with a Pentium M 2GHz) is not good. It behaves
On Mon, Nov 14, 2005 at 12:40:36PM -0500, Pierre-Luc Drouin wrote:
Yep, smart battery is definately the problem. The performance of my
laptop is back to normal when I remove the xfce4-battery-plugin.
acpiconf -i loop reproduces the problem for me too. So it looks like
there is something
Kris Kennaway wrote:
On Mon, Nov 14, 2005 at 12:40:36PM -0500, Pierre-Luc Drouin wrote:
Yep, smart battery is definately the problem. The performance of my
laptop is back to normal when I remove the xfce4-battery-plugin.
acpiconf -i loop reproduces the problem for me too. So it looks like
Last friday I did a cvsup
src/buildworld/buildkernel/installkernel/installworld/mergemaster on my
laptop from 6.0-RELEASE to 6.0-STABLE and since the performance of my
laptop (Dell Precision M70 with a Pentium M 2GHz) is not good. It
behaves like if the bus was saturated. I noticed that sound
I wanted also to add that my mouse pointer hangs on X since the upgrade.
So the computer behaves as if it was under heavy load even if the CPU
usage is almost 0%
Pierre-Luc Drouin wrote:
Last friday I did a cvsup
src/buildworld/buildkernel/installkernel/installworld/mergemaster on
my laptop
Hi.
On Sun, Nov 13, 2005 at 12:40:53PM -0500, Pierre-Luc Drouin wrote:
I wanted also to add that my mouse pointer hangs on X since the upgrade.
So the computer behaves as if it was under heavy load even if the CPU
usage is almost 0%
cpufreq/powerd? Did you check, your laptop runs at
Oliver Brandmueller wrote:
Hi.
On Sun, Nov 13, 2005 at 12:40:53PM -0500, Pierre-Luc Drouin wrote:
I wanted also to add that my mouse pointer hangs on X since the upgrade.
So the computer behaves as if it was under heavy load even if the CPU
usage is almost 0%
cpufreq/powerd? Did
On Sun, Nov 13, 2005 at 02:35:23PM -0500, Pierre-Luc Drouin wrote:
Oliver Brandmueller wrote:
Hi.
On Sun, Nov 13, 2005 at 12:40:53PM -0500, Pierre-Luc Drouin wrote:
I wanted also to add that my mouse pointer hangs on X since the upgrade.
So the computer behaves as if it was under
Kris Kennaway wrote:
On Sun, Nov 13, 2005 at 02:35:23PM -0500, Pierre-Luc Drouin wrote:
Oliver Brandmueller wrote:
Hi.
On Sun, Nov 13, 2005 at 12:40:53PM -0500, Pierre-Luc Drouin wrote:
I wanted also to add that my mouse pointer hangs on X since the upgrade.
So the
24 matches
Mail list logo
