Re: SunFire X2200 ilo's bge1 DOWN/UP

2013-06-06 Thread YongHyeon PYUN
On Mon, Jun 03, 2013 at 09:25:33AM +0300, Daniel Braniss wrote: On Fri, May 31, 2013 at 08:24:47AM +0300, Daniel Braniss wrote: On Thursday, May 30, 2013 2:44:35 am Daniel Braniss wrote: --/04w6evG8XlLl3ft Content-Type: text/x-diff; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition:

Re: SunFire X2200 ilo's bge1 DOWN/UP

2013-06-03 Thread Daniel Braniss
On Fri, May 31, 2013 at 08:24:47AM +0300, Daniel Braniss wrote: On Thursday, May 30, 2013 2:44:35 am Daniel Braniss wrote: --/04w6evG8XlLl3ft Content-Type: text/x-diff; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: attachment; filename=bge.media_sts.diff Index:

Re: SunFire X2200 ilo's bge1 DOWN/UP

2013-05-30 Thread Daniel Braniss
--/04w6evG8XlLl3ft Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline On Tue, May 28, 2013 at 09:55:24AM +0300, Daniel Braniss wrote: On Tue, May 28, 2013 at 09:28:00AM +0300, Daniel Braniss wrote: On Mon, May 27, 2013 at 10:59:28AM +0300, Daniel Braniss wrote:

Re: SunFire X2200 ilo's bge1 DOWN/UP

2013-05-30 Thread John Baldwin
On Thursday, May 30, 2013 2:44:35 am Daniel Braniss wrote: --/04w6evG8XlLl3ft Content-Type: text/x-diff; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: attachment; filename=bge.media_sts.diff Index: sys/dev/bge/if_bge.c === ---

Re: SunFire X2200 ilo's bge1 DOWN/UP

2013-05-30 Thread Daniel Braniss
On Thursday, May 30, 2013 2:44:35 am Daniel Braniss wrote: --/04w6evG8XlLl3ft Content-Type: text/x-diff; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: attachment; filename=bge.media_sts.diff Index: sys/dev/bge/if_bge.c ===

Re: SunFire X2200 ilo's bge1 DOWN/UP

2013-05-30 Thread YongHyeon PYUN
On Fri, May 31, 2013 at 08:24:47AM +0300, Daniel Braniss wrote: On Thursday, May 30, 2013 2:44:35 am Daniel Braniss wrote: --/04w6evG8XlLl3ft Content-Type: text/x-diff; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: attachment; filename=bge.media_sts.diff Index: sys/dev/bge/if_bge.c

Re: SunFire X2200 ilo's bge1 DOWN/UP

2013-05-29 Thread YongHyeon PYUN
On Tue, May 28, 2013 at 09:55:24AM +0300, Daniel Braniss wrote: On Tue, May 28, 2013 at 09:28:00AM +0300, Daniel Braniss wrote: On Mon, May 27, 2013 at 10:59:28AM +0300, Daniel Braniss wrote: On Fri, May 24, 2013 at 05:31:13PM +0300, Daniel Braniss wrote: hi, after upgrading to

Re: SunFire X2200 ilo's bge1 DOWN/UP

2013-05-29 Thread Daniel Braniss
--/04w6evG8XlLl3ft Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline On Tue, May 28, 2013 at 09:55:24AM +0300, Daniel Braniss wrote: On Tue, May 28, 2013 at 09:28:00AM +0300, Daniel Braniss wrote: On Mon, May 27, 2013 at 10:59:28AM +0300, Daniel Braniss wrote:

Re: SunFire X2200 ilo's bge1 DOWN/UP

2013-05-28 Thread Daniel Braniss
On Mon, May 27, 2013 at 10:59:28AM +0300, Daniel Braniss wrote: On Fri, May 24, 2013 at 05:31:13PM +0300, Daniel Braniss wrote: hi, after upgrading to 9.1-stable, this particular hardware - SunFire X2200, Show me dmesg(bge(4) and brgphy(4) only) and 'ifconfig bge1' output.

Re: SunFire X2200 ilo's bge1 DOWN/UP

2013-05-28 Thread Daniel Braniss
... There are ways you can speed up the replication time. I tend to flood a ser= ver with TCP while I've heard of it happening under UDP flood too. Here's a nice way to flood a server with TCP (assuming you have SSH access = to the system via keys): sh -c 'while :;do dd

Re: SunFire X2200 ilo's bge1 DOWN/UP

2013-05-28 Thread YongHyeon PYUN
On Tue, May 28, 2013 at 09:28:00AM +0300, Daniel Braniss wrote: On Mon, May 27, 2013 at 10:59:28AM +0300, Daniel Braniss wrote: On Fri, May 24, 2013 at 05:31:13PM +0300, Daniel Braniss wrote: hi, after upgrading to 9.1-stable, this particular hardware - SunFire X2200,

Re: SunFire X2200 ilo's bge1 DOWN/UP

2013-05-28 Thread Jeremy Chadwick
On Tue, May 28, 2013 at 09:28:00AM +0300, Daniel Braniss wrote: On Mon, May 27, 2013 at 10:59:28AM +0300, Daniel Braniss wrote: On Fri, May 24, 2013 at 05:31:13PM +0300, Daniel Braniss wrote: hi, after upgrading to 9.1-stable, this particular hardware - SunFire X2200,

Re: SunFire X2200 ilo's bge1 DOWN/UP

2013-05-28 Thread Daniel Braniss
On Tue, May 28, 2013 at 09:28:00AM +0300, Daniel Braniss wrote: On Mon, May 27, 2013 at 10:59:28AM +0300, Daniel Braniss wrote: On Fri, May 24, 2013 at 05:31:13PM +0300, Daniel Braniss wrote: hi, after upgrading to 9.1-stable, this particular hardware - SunFire X2200,

Re: SunFire X2200 ilo's bge1 DOWN/UP

2013-05-28 Thread Jeremy Chadwick
On Mon, May 27, 2013 at 11:49:31PM -0700, Jeremy Chadwick wrote: Other question: is there any correlation between the amount of time that goes by between events with, say, ARP/MAC address expiry in arp -a? I mention this because I know some of the ASF methods have historically shown two MAC

Re: SunFire X2200 ilo's bge1 DOWN/UP

2013-05-28 Thread Daniel Braniss
[...] 1. r248226 in head was MFC'd to stable/9 as r248858. Validation: http://svnweb.freebsd.org/base/stable/9/sys/dev/bge/if_bge.c?view=log So the answer: whether or not you have that MFC in stable/9 depends on what SVN rev your kernel is. I do a svnsync then I convert to

Re: SunFire X2200 ilo's bge1 DOWN/UP

2013-05-28 Thread Jeremy Chadwick
On Tue, May 28, 2013 at 10:57:22AM +0300, Daniel Braniss wrote: [...] 1. r248226 in head was MFC'd to stable/9 as r248858. Validation: http://svnweb.freebsd.org/base/stable/9/sys/dev/bge/if_bge.c?view=log So the answer: whether or not you have that MFC in stable/9 depends

Re: SunFire X2200 ilo's bge1 DOWN/UP

2013-05-27 Thread YongHyeon PYUN
On Fri, May 24, 2013 at 05:31:13PM +0300, Daniel Braniss wrote: hi, after upgrading to 9.1-stable, this particular hardware - SunFire X2200, Show me dmesg(bge(4) and brgphy(4) only) and 'ifconfig bge1' output. is toggeling bge1 DOWN/UP every few hours, this port is being used by the ILO. To

Re: SunFire X2200 ilo's bge1 DOWN/UP

2013-05-27 Thread Daniel Braniss
On Fri, May 24, 2013 at 05:31:13PM +0300, Daniel Braniss wrote: hi, after upgrading to 9.1-stable, this particular hardware - SunFire X2200, Show me dmesg(bge(4) and brgphy(4) only) and 'ifconfig bge1' output. bge0: Broadcom NetXtreme Gigabit Ethernet Controller, ASIC rev. 0x009003 mem

Re: SunFire X2200 ilo's bge1 DOWN/UP

2013-05-27 Thread Teske, Devin
On May 27, 2013, at 12:59 AM, Daniel Braniss wrote: On Fri, May 24, 2013 at 05:31:13PM +0300, Daniel Braniss wrote: hi, after upgrading to 9.1-stable, this particular hardware - SunFire X2200, If you're truly running stable/9, and it's up-to-date, you should have have already SVN revisions

Re: SunFire X2200 ilo's bge1 DOWN/UP

2013-05-27 Thread YongHyeon PYUN
On Mon, May 27, 2013 at 10:59:28AM +0300, Daniel Braniss wrote: On Fri, May 24, 2013 at 05:31:13PM +0300, Daniel Braniss wrote: hi, after upgrading to 9.1-stable, this particular hardware - SunFire X2200, Show me dmesg(bge(4) and brgphy(4) only) and 'ifconfig bge1' output.

Re: SunFire X2200 ilo's bge1 DOWN/UP

2013-05-25 Thread Daniel Braniss
Daniel Braniss wrote: hi, after upgrading to 9.1-stable, this particular hardware - SunFire X2200, is toggeling bge1 DOWN/UP every few hours, this port is being used by the ILO. To check, I upgraded another identical host, and the same problem appears. There is not correlation with

Re: SunFire X2200 ilo's bge1 DOWN/UP

2013-05-25 Thread Daniel Braniss
Is this your bug? http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=171121 no, this bge is only used for the ilo, it happens even if it's idling, ie no active connection. it is also very erratic, it happens at random intervals, from 3 hs to 10hs, and the down/up 'hickup' lasts between less than a

Re: SunFire X2200 ilo's bge1 DOWN/UP

2013-05-24 Thread Mark Felder
Is this your bug? http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=171121 ___ freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-stable-unsubscr...@freebsd.org

Re: SunFire X2200 ilo's bge1 DOWN/UP

2013-05-24 Thread Miroslav Lachman
Daniel Braniss wrote: hi, after upgrading to 9.1-stable, this particular hardware - SunFire X2200, is toggeling bge1 DOWN/UP every few hours, this port is being used by the ILO. To check, I upgraded another identical host, and the same problem appears. There is not correlation with time, since