Matthew Dillon wrote:
In anycase, as usual I rattle on. If FreeBSD is interested I recommend
simply looking at the cool features I added to DragonFly's kernel to
make virtual kernels possible. It's really just three major items:
Signal mailboxes, a new MAP_VPAGETABLE for
: It seems very similar to User Mode Linux, rather than a true VM environment.
http://user-mode-linux.sourceforge.net/ Each DragonFlyBSD vkernel runs as a
process. I don't know why this is even interesting, for anything but kernel
developers. Improving BSD jails to the same level as
:Virtual kernels are a cool idea, but I (and I believe practically anyone
:using FreeBSD for non-development work) would much rather see a Xen-like
:functionality (to be precise: ability to run foreign kernels and
:Windows; qemu is too slow) than just a variation of the native kernel.
There
On 3/13/07, Kip Macy [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I know you were working on Xen support in FreeBSD, but web about it
(http://www.fsmware.com/xenofreebsd/7.0/STATUS) has one year old info
(support planned in FreeBSD 6.1). So is there any progress, or Xen will
not be in any near future release?
- Nikolas Britton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
What about implementing something like DragonFly BSD virtual kernels?
Matthew Dillon talks about it in is bsdtalk interview:
http://cisx1.uma.maine.edu/~wbackman/bsdtalk/bsdtalk098.mp3
It seems very similar to User Mode Linux, rather than a
Nikolas Britton wrote:
On 3/12/07, Andras Gót [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Nikolas Britton wrote:
On 3/12/07, Ronald Klop [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mon, 12 Mar 2007 20:16:32 +0100, Nikolas Britton
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Is FreeBSD making any progress in Xen Dom0 / Intel VT support? I'd
Kip Macy wrote:
On 3/12/07, Ivan Voras [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Nikolas Britton wrote:
Free Solaris DVD software kits (Free shipping too):
http://www.sun.com/solaris/freemedia
Or NetBSD: http://www.netbsd.org/Ports/xen/
Heh, you're still confused about what list your on.
I know you
I know you were working on Xen support in FreeBSD, but web about it
(http://www.fsmware.com/xenofreebsd/7.0/STATUS) has one year old info
(support planned in FreeBSD 6.1). So is there any progress, or Xen will
not be in any near future release?
Basically Xen did not mature in the fashion that I
Free Solaris DVD software kits (Free shipping too):
http://www.sun.com/solaris/freemedia
Sweet!
On 3/12/07, Nikolas Britton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Is FreeBSD making any progress in Xen Dom0 / Intel VT support? I'd
really like to consolidate some underutilized FreeBSD servers. Are
their any
Is FreeBSD making any progress in Xen Dom0 / Intel VT support? I'd
really like to consolidate some underutilized FreeBSD servers. Are
their any alternative solutions that will enable me to do this kind of
stuff with FreeBSD, or would it be better to go with Solaris Dom0 +
FreeBSD DomU?
On Mon, 12 Mar 2007 20:16:32 +0100, Nikolas Britton
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Is FreeBSD making any progress in Xen Dom0 / Intel VT support? I'd
really like to consolidate some underutilized FreeBSD servers. Are
their any alternative solutions that will enable me to do this kind of
stuff with
Nikolas Britton wrote:
Free Solaris DVD software kits (Free shipping too):
http://www.sun.com/solaris/freemedia
Or NetBSD: http://www.netbsd.org/Ports/xen/
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
On 3/12/07, Ivan Voras [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Nikolas Britton wrote:
Free Solaris DVD software kits (Free shipping too):
http://www.sun.com/solaris/freemedia
Or NetBSD: http://www.netbsd.org/Ports/xen/
Yes that was my next choice after FreeBSD but they don't support the
Areca RAID
On 3/12/07, Ivan Voras [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Nikolas Britton wrote:
Free Solaris DVD software kits (Free shipping too):
http://www.sun.com/solaris/freemedia
Or NetBSD: http://www.netbsd.org/Ports/xen/
Heh, you're still confused about what list your on.
On Mar 12, 2007, at 4:34 PM, Nikolas Britton wrote:
What I'd really love to do is split up each service (httpd, postgres,
samba/nfs, ldap/nis, asterisk, etc.) into discrete virtual machines.
It's too much work trying to make them all play nice on one system,
This is the purpose for which we
Nikolas Britton wrote:
On 3/12/07, Ronald Klop [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mon, 12 Mar 2007 20:16:32 +0100, Nikolas Britton
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Is FreeBSD making any progress in Xen Dom0 / Intel VT support? I'd
really like to consolidate some underutilized FreeBSD servers. Are
their
On 3/12/07, Ronald Klop [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mon, 12 Mar 2007 20:16:32 +0100, Nikolas Britton
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Is FreeBSD making any progress in Xen Dom0 / Intel VT support? I'd
really like to consolidate some underutilized FreeBSD servers. Are
their any alternative solutions
On 3/12/07, Andras Gót [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Nikolas Britton wrote:
On 3/12/07, Ronald Klop [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mon, 12 Mar 2007 20:16:32 +0100, Nikolas Britton
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Is FreeBSD making any progress in Xen Dom0 / Intel VT support? I'd
really like to
18 matches
Mail list logo
