On 09/02/2010 05:44, jhell wrote:
On Mon, 8 Feb 2010 23:37, mv@ wrote:
On 3/02/2010 10:52 PM, Jordi Espasa Clofent wrote:
Some shell-scripts based on dd or rsync, for example. Even a daily
antivirus (ClamAV) scanner means an extensive I/O.
Programs like Rsync do provide --bwlimit= which
On 3/02/2010 10:52 PM, Jordi Espasa Clofent wrote:
On 02/03/2010 12:12 PM, Bruce Simpson wrote:
On 02/02/2010 17:19, Jordi Espasa Clofent wrote:
In FreeBSD we've nice(1), renice(8) and even rtprio, idprio(1) but if
I'm understanding correctly, they're related to CPU priorty only, not
to I/O.
On Mon, 8 Feb 2010 23:37, mv@ wrote:
On 3/02/2010 10:52 PM, Jordi Espasa Clofent wrote:
On 02/03/2010 12:12 PM, Bruce Simpson wrote:
On 02/02/2010 17:19, Jordi Espasa Clofent wrote:
In FreeBSD we've nice(1), renice(8) and even rtprio, idprio(1) but if
I'm understanding correctly, they're
Great aclarations. Thanks.
--
I must not fear. Fear is the mind-killer. Fear is the little-death that
brings total obliteration. I will face my fear. I will permit it to pass
over me and through me. And when it has gone past I will turn the inner
eye to see its path. Where the fear has gone
Great work Luigi ;)
That's amazing... anyway ¿is it production-ready?
--
I must not fear. Fear is the mind-killer. Fear is the little-death that
brings total obliteration. I will face my fear. I will permit it to pass
over me and through me. And when it has gone past I will turn the inner
eye
On Fri, Feb 05, 2010 at 12:07:36PM +0100, Jordi Espasa Clofent wrote:
Great work Luigi ;)
That's amazing... anyway ?is it production-ready?
i would say it is pretty solid. I used it on my main workstation
and desktop for a few months last year without a glitch.
cheers
luigi
--
I must not
On Fri, Feb 05, 2010 at 06:06:22PM +0100, Luigi Rizzo wrote:
On Fri, Feb 05, 2010 at 12:07:36PM +0100, Jordi Espasa Clofent wrote:
Great work Luigi ;)
That's amazing... anyway ?is it production-ready?
i would say it is pretty solid. I used it on my main workstation
and desktop for a few
On Fri, Feb 05, 2010 at 09:25:55AM -0800, Jeremy Chadwick wrote:
On Fri, Feb 05, 2010 at 06:06:22PM +0100, Luigi Rizzo wrote:
On Fri, Feb 05, 2010 at 12:07:36PM +0100, Jordi Espasa Clofent wrote:
Great work Luigi ;)
That's amazing... anyway ?is it production-ready?
i would say it is
On Fri, 5 Feb 2010 09:25:55 -0800
Jeremy Chadwick free...@jdc.parodius.com wrote:
I appreciate your work on this -- truly I do -- but the above
statement is incredible. This is not meant as a flame-inducer, but
there's really no other way to phrase it:
This IS NOT what production-ready
On 02/03/10 11:52, Jordi Espasa Clofent wrote:
So I guess my question is, 'why do you need I/O scheduling, and what
aspect of system performance are you trying to solve with it' ?
Some shell-scripts based on dd or rsync, for example. Even a daily
antivirus (ClamAV) scanner means an
On Thu, Feb 04, 2010 at 01:31:36PM +, Bruce Simpson wrote:
On 02/03/10 11:52, Jordi Espasa Clofent wrote:
So I guess my question is, 'why do you need I/O scheduling, and what
aspect of system performance are you trying to solve with it' ?
...
There have been previous research forks of
On 02/02/2010 17:19, Jordi Espasa Clofent wrote:
In FreeBSD we've nice(1), renice(8) and even rtprio, idprio(1) but if
I'm understanding correctly, they're related to CPU priorty only, not
to I/O.
That's not entirely true.
A thread's CPU priority is still going to affect its ability to be
On 02/03/2010 12:12 PM, Bruce Simpson wrote:
On 02/02/2010 17:19, Jordi Espasa Clofent wrote:
In FreeBSD we've nice(1), renice(8) and even rtprio, idprio(1) but if
I'm understanding correctly, they're related to CPU priorty only, not
to I/O.
That's not entirely true.
A thread's CPU priority
Hi all,
In Linux exists the ionice(1) for get/set program io scheduling class
and priority.
In FreeBSD we've nice(1), renice(8) and even rtprio, idprio(1) but if
I'm understanding correctly, they're related to CPU priorty only, not to
I/O.
¿Is there some ionice(1) equivalent in FreeBSD?
Jordi Espasa Clofent wrote:
¿Is there some ionice(1) equivalent in FreeBSD?
No.
- Andrew
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubscribe, send any mail to
On Wed, 3 Feb 2010, Jordi Espasa Clofent wrote:
In Linux exists the ionice(1) for get/set program io scheduling
class and priority.
In FreeBSD we've nice(1), renice(8) and even rtprio, idprio(1) but if
I'm understanding correctly, they're related to CPU priorty only, not
to I/O.
¿Is there
16 matches
Mail list logo
