Martin Nilsson wrote:
Artem Kuchin wrote:
But i don't understand how and why it happened. ONly 6 hours ago (a
night before)
all those files were backed up fine w/o any read error. And now,
right after replacing
the driver and starting rebuild it said that there are bad sectors
all over those
On Tue, 21 Aug 2007, Artem Kuchin wrote:
could get access to number of left reserved sector for remapping. Any
idea about these two for 3ware controllers? Also, someone should
mention, that while using raid MUST do verifies often.
You can run smartmontools on disks behind 3ware controllers, eg
Artem Kuchin wrote:
That exactly was i was talking about. I don't acess to individual disks
behind raid unit, so, i cannot doit. I don't know it controller
VERIFY command does it right. If it doesm then i shoudl put it into a cron
job and do it on weekly basis. Also, it would halpfull it i
Artem Kuchin unleashed the infinite monkeys on 20/08/2007 23:38 producing:
---SNIP---
But i don't understand how and why it happened. ONly 6 hours ago (a
night before)
all those files were backed up fine w/o any read error. And now, right
after replacing
the driver and starting rebuild it
While we are on the subject:
What is the practical difference between VERIFY and REBUILD with regards
to a RAID-5 array?
My Highpoint RocketRAID 2320 and 2340 cards can be scheduled to perform
either verify or rebuild. I currently have them set to verify the arrays
weekly. Is that reasonably
Darren Pilgrim wrote:
Artem Kuchin wrote:
That exactly was i was talking about. I don't acess to individual
disks
behind raid unit, so, i cannot doit. I don't know it controller
VERIFY command does it right. If it doesm then i shoudl put it into
a cron
job and do it on weekly basis. Also, it
You can run smartmontools on disks behind 3ware controllers, eg
/dev/twe0 -d 3ware,0 -a -o on -S on -m [EMAIL PROTECTED]
/dev/twe0 -d 3ware,1 -a -o on -S on -m [EMAIL PROTECTED]
did this:
smartctl /dev/twe0 -d 3ware,1 -a
for each driver on another server. Two driver are pretty old, the driver
While we are on the subject:
What is the practical difference between VERIFY and REBUILD with regards
to a RAID-5 array?
Verify should at a minimum read all the data. Ideally, it would read the
checksum blocks too to make sure they are still valid, but it might not.
Rebuild should read all
On Tue, 21 Aug 2007, Artem Kuchin wrote:
Now, what i don't understand is why Hardware_ECC_Recovered and
Seek_Error_Rate are so hight. The first one is maybe relate
to cabling problem. The driver are all in hot swap baskets of
supermicro 2u case. Maybe backpanel is no so good?
Hi
FreeBSD gw-1.stromnet.se 6.2-RELEASE-p1 FreeBSD 6.2-RELEASE-p1 #7:
Tue Feb 13 18:24:34 CET 2007 [EMAIL PROTECTED]:/usr/obj/usr/
src/sys/ROUTER.POLLING i386
(ROUTER.POLLING is GENERIC + options DEVICE_POLLING and ALTQ,
IPSEC, also pfsync and carp)
This weekend I had a disk
On Tue, Aug 21, 2007 at 02:15:08PM +0200, Johan Ström wrote:
Hi
FreeBSD gw-1.stromnet.se 6.2-RELEASE-p1 FreeBSD 6.2-RELEASE-p1 #7:
Tue Feb 13 18:24:34 CET 2007 [EMAIL PROTECTED]:/usr/obj/usr/
src/sys/ROUTER.POLLING i386
(ROUTER.POLLING is GENERIC + options DEVICE_POLLING and
FreeBSD ghreen.sphere 6.2-STABLE FreeBSD 6.2-STABLE #0: Sun Aug 19
20:10:46 CDT 2007 [EMAIL PROTECTED]:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GHREEN
i386
Attached dmesg, attached kernel config.
During bootup about 1 out of 5 times my box freezes right after it
enters userland at the Gathering entropy: spot,
On Aug 21, 2007, at 16:31 , Pawel Jakub Dawidek wrote:
On Tue, Aug 21, 2007 at 02:15:08PM +0200, Johan Ström wrote:
Hi
FreeBSD gw-1.stromnet.se 6.2-RELEASE-p1 FreeBSD 6.2-RELEASE-p1 #7:
Tue Feb 13 18:24:34 CET 2007 [EMAIL PROTECTED]:/usr/obj/usr/
src/sys/ROUTER.POLLING i386
Artem Kuchin wrote:
Darren Pilgrim wrote:
Artem Kuchin wrote:
That exactly was i was talking about. I don't acess to individual
disks
behind raid unit, so, i cannot doit. I don't know it controller
VERIFY command does it right. If it doesm then i shoudl put it into
a cron
job and do it on
Hi,
I think I found a deficiency wrt. to pam_group (which also hits sudo(8)
so this might be libc related instead).
I found this while trying to migrate groups into LDAP, but you don't
need LDAP to reproduce this, simply place the following in /etc/group
wheel:*:0:root
wheel:*:0:us
% getent
On Aug 21, 2007, at 12:50 PM, Ulrich Spoerlein wrote:
I found this while trying to migrate groups into LDAP, but you don't
need LDAP to reproduce this, simply place the following in /etc/group
wheel:*:0:root
wheel:*:0:us
That's a misconfiguration. From man 5 group:
The group field is the
Ok, so how are you supposed to control membership of the wheel group
via ldap? Ok, you COULD remove the local wheel entry in /etc/group,
but this would probably be a bad idea if the ldap server were
unavailable.
I've had a similar problem to this where group names are duplicated
across
Try:
wheel:*:0:root,us
It looks like pam was stopping at the first matching line as you would
expect from the man page for the group file. If there is a bug it is in
the more liberal interpretation by other software.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hi,
Would it be possible for a committer to take a look at:
http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=115697
There's only about a month or so before the new daylight savings rule
becomes effective, and it would be nice if -STABLE had the changes
committed before then.
Cheers.
--
Jonathan
On Aug 21, 2007, at 2:02 PM, Richard Foulkes wrote:
Ok, so how are you supposed to control membership of the wheel
group via ldap? Ok, you COULD remove the local wheel entry in /etc/
group, but this would probably be a bad idea if the ldap server
were unavailable.
You've aptly summarized
On Wed, Aug 22, 2007 at 11:38:21AM +1200, Jonathan Chen wrote:
Would it be possible for a committer to take a look at:
http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=115697
There's only about a month or so before the new daylight savings rule
becomes effective, and it would be nice if
On Wed, Aug 22, 2007 at 11:38:21AM +1200, Jonathan Chen wrote:
Would it be possible for a committer to take a look at:
http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=115697
There's only about a month or so before the new daylight savings rule
becomes effective, and it would be nice
22 matches
Mail list logo
