Hi!
7.0-RELEASE images came out with FIVE disks - disc 1 to 3 and separate LiveFS
and docs. What do they contain? I can guess that 2 and 3 are pure packages so
I don't need to download them if I want to compile out from ports. And in
previous releases I had to download the disc1 ONLY as it had
Daniel O'Connor wrote:
On Fri, 7 Mar 2008, Vincent Mialon wrote:
I tested various options in boot0cfg with no sucess. I also tested
the howto from
http://typo.submonkey.net/articles/2006/04/13/installing-freebsd-on-u
sb-stick-episode-2 with a 6.3 FreeBSD release which boots on my pc but
On Fri, Mar 07, 2008 at 10:49:17AM +0100, Miroslav Lachman wrote:
Daniel O'Connor wrote:
On Fri, 7 Mar 2008, Vincent Mialon wrote:
I tested various options in boot0cfg with no sucess. I also tested
the howto from
http://typo.submonkey.net/articles/2006/04/13/installing-freebsd-on-u
On Fri, Mar 07, 2008 at 10:49:17AM +0100, Miroslav Lachman wrote:
I think you can use GRUB, because it is used in stage where all systems
works the same way and amd64 kernel will be booted in later stage.
Uh, no. amd64 kernels rely on information that only the loader supplies,
such as the
On Thu, Mar 06, 2008 at 10:37:03PM +0100, Uwe Doering wrote:
Last time I looked (in FreeBSD 4.x) these were connections that got
stuck in an early stage, that is, before the HTTP request had been
received. The 'accf_http' filter which wants to parse said request
waits forever in this
To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
This sybject has nothing to do with [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Posting to 2 FreeBSD lists is deprecated.
hackers@ is for releases.
Attempting to shrink to one list, this posted with:
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
bcc:
On Fri, 7 Mar 2008, Jeremy Chadwick wrote:
I think you can use GRUB, because it is used in stage where all
systems works the same way and amd64 kernel will be booted in later
stage.
All of what you've said is correct. I'm not sure who's having
problems with GRUB on USB sticks, because
Hello all,
recently I've tried a few benchmarks around pipe throughput on Linux vs.
FreeBSD.
Everyone interesting can see my stuff at http://213.148.29.37/PipeBench, and
initial post to Linux kernel developer mailing list at
http://www.uwsg.iu.edu/hypermail/linux/kernel/0803.0/1837.html
It was
Hi Michael Gratton!
On Thu, 06 Mar 2008 13:46:52 +1100; Michael Gratton wrote about 'Re: INET6 --
and why I don't use it':
* I have never liked how IPv6 denotes its addresses by using colon-
delimited hexadecimal strings.
The glib answer would be and this is why we have the DNS. Yes it is
Hi Jeremy Chadwick!
On Wed, 5 Mar 2008 08:01:43 -0800; Jeremy Chadwick wrote about 'Re: INET6 --
and why I don't use it':
Makes it harder to debug, etc. Don't want to see anything IPv6 related in
command output, to let programs to bind on IPv6 addresses, etc.
Changing the Subject (but
Hello,
I tried to install FreeBSD-6.2/6.3/7.0 on Dell E520.
When it get boot install CD, ask me language selection then panic. I mean
keyboard, mouse no response, only can power off.
Dell hasn't any serial port for debug.
Only I use digital camera to capture screen.
I tried to all boot
On Thursday 06 March 2008 07:29:40 pm Daniel O'Connor wrote:
On Fri, 7 Mar 2008, Vincent Mialon wrote:
I tested various options in boot0cfg with no sucess. I also tested
the howto from
http://typo.submonkey.net/articles/2006/04/13/installing-freebsd-on-u
sb-stick-episode-2 with a 6.3
Vincent Mialon wrote:
The boot selector is shown and I can choose between the two images that
nanobsd generated. When it times out BTX crash with very fast scrolling
lines. When I shutdown I can see BTX Halted with processor registers
written on the screen. I tried different ways to bypass
John Nielsen wrote:
On Thursday 06 March 2008 04:53:55 pm Pete French wrote:
I want to take a disc partition on one box and make it available to
another box to be mounted. Under 7.0 it looks like I have a choice
of using either ggated to do this, or the new iscsis initiator. Does
anyone have
07.03.08 @ 16:10 Julian H. Stacey wrote:
To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
This sybject has nothing to do with [EMAIL PROTECTED]
It has because 6.3-RELEASE is also affected with docs issue, and future
releases 6.4 and 7.1 will be in both branches, as ell as 8.0.
Cc: [EMAIL
Hi,
We have been building RELENG_6_x source trees from read only NFS file
systems for well over a year now with out any problems. However I have
just tried to do make buildworld on a RELENG_7_0 source tree from
yesterday and it failed to build with the following error:
===
Last time I used it the iscsi-target port had some significant bugs, but
looking through cvs it looks like those may have been addressed. I can't
really speak to performance. Reliability should be all right as long as
you don't have frequent network issues.
Thanks for the warning - do you
According to at least two reports, iSCSI initiator in 7.0-RELEASE is
buggy and has problems that manifest in very low performance. There are
patches for it which should be committed soon.
See this thread:
http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-scsi/2008-February/003383.html
Thanks - low
Derek Taylor wrote:
On Fri, Feb 29, 2008 09:50 PM Sean [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Check /etc/make.conf for CFLAGS, and if present remove it.
This fixed the problem.
Thank you.
-Derek.
I can confirm a failure in the same spot. What concerns me is in both
my failure, and Derek's, the malloc
David Malone wrote:
On Thu, Mar 06, 2008 at 10:37:03PM +0100, Uwe Doering wrote:
Last time I looked (in FreeBSD 4.x) these were connections that got
stuck in an early stage, that is, before the HTTP request had been
received. The 'accf_http' filter which wants to parse said request
So having the queue showing full in the netstat should be normal, and
not have any side effects? btw, i tested this on 4.x, 5.x, 6.x and 7.x,
they all appear to behave in the same fashion.
I must admit that I did not check netstat, but I believe you would
always see a full queue in netstat
David Malone wrote:
I must admit that I did not check netstat, but I believe you would
always see a full queue in netstat once the machine had been running
for a while. My test was to open a large number of connections, and
check that once I exceded the backlog that previous connections
were
On Friday 07 March 2008 11:25:39 am Pete French wrote:
Last time I used it the iscsi-target port had some significant bugs,
but looking through cvs it looks like those may have been addressed.
I can't really speak to performance. Reliability should be all right
as long as you don't have
On Friday 07 March 2008 10:08:59 am Ivan Voras wrote:
John Nielsen wrote:
On Thursday 06 March 2008 04:53:55 pm Pete French wrote:
I want to take a disc partition on one box and make it available to
another box to be mounted. Under 7.0 it looks like I have a choice
of using either ggated
Hello all,
I want to run a (FreeBSD 7) server facing the internet and running Apache and
wondered if its safe out of the box .. so to speak ?
Do i have to do a degree in configuration to allow it to face the wild west
(internet) ?
I also want to use it for storage of media and serving of media
Joshua Coombs wrote:
Derek Taylor wrote:
On Fri, Feb 29, 2008 09:50 PM Sean [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Check /etc/make.conf for CFLAGS, and if present remove it.
This fixed the problem.
Thank you.
-Derek.
I can confirm a failure in the same spot. What concerns me is in both
my failure,
At 12:02 PM 3/7/2008, Darran wrote:
Hello all,
I want to run a (FreeBSD 7) server facing the internet and running Apache and
wondered if its safe out of the box .. so to speak ?
Yes, today it is. But that does not necessarily mean you will not
need to do updates, apply patches, perhaps change
Jason Evans wrote:
cc1 was only trying to request 130MB, my datasize is 512MB, why did it
fail?
It looks to me like gcc is trying to allocate a single 130MiB object,
but you don't say anything about how much memory is already in use. It
may well be that there are no remaining places in the
Looks like pkg_add -r is failing on RELENG_7:
--- main.c.orig 2008-03-07 10:20:00.0 -0800
+++ main.c 2008-03-07 09:58:56.0 -0800
@@ -81,7 +81,7 @@
{ 502100, 502128, /packages-5-current },
{ 503100, 599000, /packages-5-stable },
{ 600100, 699000,
On Fri, Mar 07, 2008 at 08:54:53AM -0800, Jason Evans wrote:
Joshua Coombs wrote:
Derek Taylor wrote:
On Fri, Feb 29, 2008 09:50 PM Sean [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Check /etc/make.conf for CFLAGS, and if present remove it.
This fixed the problem.
Thank you.
-Derek.
I can confirm a
Mike Tancsa [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
At 12:02 PM 3/7/2008, Darran wrote:
Hello all,
I want to run a (FreeBSD 7) server facing the internet and running Apache and
wondered if its safe out of the box .. so to speak ?
Yes, today it is. But that does not necessarily mean you will not
need
At 01:43 PM 3/7/2008, Darran wrote:
building the world etc etc, i think the question really boiled down to is it
safe to run it after an install and minor configuration and i believe that at
this point it is ..
We have a number of busy production boxes running 7.0 (spam/virus
scanning of
On Friday 07 March 2008 09:13:12 am John Baldwin wrote:
On Thursday 06 March 2008 07:29:40 pm Daniel O'Connor wrote:
On Fri, 7 Mar 2008, Vincent Mialon wrote:
I tested various options in boot0cfg with no sucess. I also tested
the howto from
On 07/03/2008, John Nielsen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Friday 07 March 2008 10:08:59 am Ivan Voras wrote:
According to at least two reports, iSCSI initiator in 7.0-RELEASE is
buggy and has problems that manifest in very low performance. There are
patches for it which should be committed
Mike Tancsa wrote:
At 12:02 PM 3/7/2008, Darran wrote:
Hello all,
I want to run a (FreeBSD 7) server facing the internet and running
Apache and
wondered if its safe out of the box .. so to speak ?
Yes, today it is. But that does not necessarily mean you will not
need to do updates, apply
On 3/6/08, Torfinn Ingolfsen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In other words; if I have machines with ipv6 adresses that I can reach
globally, but don't have a dns name for them, the usefulness is very
limited.
Is that challenge solved somehow with ipv6?
It doesn't look like dyndns.org supports ipv6
On 2008-03-07 15:13, John Baldwin wrote:
Try this instead:
http://people.freebsd.org/~jhb/patches/btx_real.patch
Hi John,
I've encounted way too many machines already with BIOSes that clash with
the regular btx loader... :(
Might it not be a nice idea to put out a RELENG_7 or RELENG_7_0
Hello,
I'm running 7.0-Stable on the ASUS P5K-VM + Intel Q6600 box.
If Palm device is disconnected after synchronization, system crashes with
following stacktrace:
#0 doadump () at pcpu.h:194
#1 0x0004 in ?? ()
#2 0x802bea49 in boot (howto=260)
at
On Fri, Mar 07, 2008 at 11:51:49PM +0100, Dimitry Andric wrote:
On 2008-03-07 15:13, John Baldwin wrote:
Try this instead:
http://people.freebsd.org/~jhb/patches/btx_real.patch
Hi John,
I've encounted way too many machines already with BIOSes that clash with
the regular btx
Tom Judge wrote:
Hi,
We have been building RELENG_6_x source trees from read only NFS file
systems for well over a year now with out any problems. However I have
just tried to do make buildworld on a RELENG_7_0 source tree from
yesterday and it failed to build with the following error:
Hi,
I've recently run the upgrade gamut and moved from 6.3 to 7.0. I've
had a few hick ups but this one I can't resolve. I used musicpd
(http://www.freshports.org/audio/musicpd/) on 6.3 to stream to a
shoutcast server. When I start mpd on 7.0, it immediately has a
segmentation fault and dumps its
TB --- 2008-03-08 04:45:14 - tinderbox 2.3 running on freebsd-stable.sentex.ca
TB --- 2008-03-08 04:45:14 - starting RELENG_7 tinderbox run for powerpc/powerpc
TB --- 2008-03-08 04:45:14 - cleaning the object tree
TB --- 2008-03-08 04:45:32 - cvsupping the source tree
TB --- 2008-03-08 04:45:32 -
42 matches
Mail list logo
