Please, fix 4 times repetition of all its content in
stable/7/cddl/compat/opensolaris/include/libshare.h.
The same:
stable/7/sys/cddl/compat/opensolaris/sys/pathname.h
stable/7/sys/cddl/compat/opensolaris/sys/kidmap.h
stable/7/sys/cddl/compat/opensolaris/sys/file.h
fixed by r192523
On Wed, May 20, 2009 at 10:21:23AM -0400, John Baldwin wrote:
Try this. It reverts the single-CCB part of the previous
commit while keeping the other fixes. I missed that the
CCB might still be in flight when we schedule another rescan.
Applied to mpt_raid.c,v 1.15.2.1 2008/07/28 17:05:09
I will be MFC'ing the newer ZFS support some time this afternoon. Both
world and kernel will need to be re-built. Existing pools will
continue to work without upgrade.
If you choose to upgrade a pool to take advantage of new features you
will no longer be able to use it with sources prior
Latest stable sources, machdep.c is
$FreeBSD: src/sys/i386/i386/intr_machdep.c,v 1.29.2.7 2009/05/19
22:07:54 jhb Exp $
cc -c -O -pipe -std=c99 -g -Wall -Wredundant-decls -Wnested-externs
-Wstrict-prototypes -Wmissing-prototypes -Wpointer-arith -Winline
-Wcast-qual -Wundef
On 20.05.2009, at 22:41, Kip Macy wrote:
On Wed, May 20, 2009 at 3:11 PM, Mike Tancsa m...@sentex.net wrote:
At 05:59 PM 5/20/2009, Kip Macy wrote:
If you choose to upgrade a pool to take advantage of new features
you
will no longer be able to use it with sources prior to today. 'zfs
Kip Macy wrote:
I will be MFC'ing the newer ZFS support some time this afternoon. Both
world and kernel will need to be re-built. Existing pools will
continue to work without upgrade.
Mounting local file systems:.
internal error: out of memory
internal error: out of memory
internal error: out
2009/5/21 Riccardo Torrini riccardo.torr...@esaote.com:
On Wed, May 20, 2009 at 10:21:23AM -0400, John Baldwin wrote:
Try this. It reverts the single-CCB part of the previous
commit while keeping the other fixes. I missed that the
CCB might still be in flight when we schedule another
2009/5/21 Kip Macy km...@freebsd.org:
The MFC went in r192498. Please let me know if you have any problems.
- zfs boot for all types now works
Is it possible to boot from ZFS without ufs boot partition?
zfsboot was added but is not build, gptzfsboot is not in tree.
--
Artis Caune
I get this in dmesg after make installkernel shutdown -r now, zfs
pool is not mounted. /usr is on zfs so can't installworld.
I can't help, but thanks for the bug report as it prompted me
to upgarde both kernel and world at the same time. Which works
fine after reboot. If I were you I would
Pertti Kosunen pertti.kosu...@pp.nic.fi wrote:
Kip Macy wrote:
I will be MFC'ing the newer ZFS support some time this afternoon. Both
world and kernel will need to be re-built. Existing pools will
continue to work without upgrade.
Mounting local file systems:.
internal error: out of
Ran into the same thing on -CURRENT when we went version 13. Some manual
intervention fixed it.
http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-current/2008-November/000508.html
/glz
--On Thursday, May 21, 2009 12:42 PM +0300 Pertti Kosunen
pertti.kosu...@pp.nic.fi wrote:
Kip Macy wrote:
I
On Thu, May 21, 2009 at 11:47:54AM +0200, Attilio Rao wrote:
Bad news: I removed the second disk during rebuilding and it
still crash. I take a screen shapshot with camera because of
too many messages for write down by hand :)
Image, src tarball and info here (about 2.2MB):
Navdeep Parhar wrote:
On Wed, May 20, 2009 at 5:00 PM, Kip Macy km...@freebsd.org wrote:
Not really a problem but a question: Is the v13 on-disk format
exactly the same as that used by Solaris/Opensolaris?
It is supposed to be. The sources are the same. However, I have not
tested
Kip Macy wrote:
On Wed, May 20, 2009 at 2:59 PM, Kip Macy km...@freebsd.org wrote:
I will be MFC'ing the newer ZFS support some time this afternoon. Both
world and kernel will need to be re-built. Existing pools will
continue to work without upgrade.
If you choose to upgrade a pool to take
Henri Hennebert wrote:
Kip Macy wrote:
On Wed, May 20, 2009 at 2:59 PM, Kip Macy km...@freebsd.org wrote:
I will be MFC'ing the newer ZFS support some time this afternoon. Both
world and kernel will need to be re-built. Existing pools will
continue to work without upgrade.
If you choose to
Goran Lowkrantz wrote:
Ran into the same thing on -CURRENT when we went version 13. Some manual
intervention fixed it.
http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-current/2008-November/000508.html
mount -t zfs ...
cd /usr/src
make NO_FSCHG= installworld
This did the job with new kernel.
On Thursday 21 May 2009 4:15:54 am Per olof Ljungmark wrote:
Latest stable sources, machdep.c is
$FreeBSD: src/sys/i386/i386/intr_machdep.c,v 1.29.2.7 2009/05/19
22:07:54 jhb Exp $
cc -c -O -pipe -std=c99 -g -Wall -Wredundant-decls -Wnested-externs
-Wstrict-prototypes
John Baldwin wrote:
On Thursday 21 May 2009 4:15:54 am Per olof Ljungmark wrote:
Latest stable sources, machdep.c is
$FreeBSD: src/sys/i386/i386/intr_machdep.c,v 1.29.2.7 2009/05/19
22:07:54 jhb Exp $
cc -c -O -pipe -std=c99 -g -Wall -Wredundant-decls -Wnested-externs
-Wstrict-prototypes
on 20/05/2009 18:56 Robert Noland said the following:
On Wed, 2009-05-20 at 17:26 +0200, Paul B. Mahol wrote:
On 5/20/09, Robert Noland rnol...@freebsd.org wrote:
Yes, if xserver is built with HAL support, I see it linked with libthr.
If HAL is disabled, it doesn't appear to be. I'm trying to
FYI, I just did an upgrade of my RELENG_7 machine with the new ZFS
merged in, and it seems to have gone mostly trouble-free. I noticed
one weirdness that could be confusion on my part - I'm no longer
seeing snapshots when I do 'zfs list'. There's a UI change in the zfs
command, and to
on 21/05/2009 17:12 Louis Mamakos said the following:
FYI, I just did an upgrade of my RELENG_7 machine with the new ZFS
merged in, and it seems to have gone mostly trouble-free. I noticed one
weirdness that could be confusion on my part - I'm no longer seeing
snapshots when I do 'zfs list'.
On Thu, May 21, 2009 at 7:12 AM, Louis Mamakos lo...@transsys.com wrote:
FYI, I just did an upgrade of my RELENG_7 machine with the new ZFS merged
in, and it seems to have gone mostly trouble-free. I noticed one weirdness
that could be confusion on my part - I'm no longer seeing snapshots when
On May 21, 2009, at 11:22 AM, Freddie Cash wrote:
On Thu, May 21, 2009 at 7:12 AM, Louis Mamakos lo...@transsys.com
wrote:
FYI, I just did an upgrade of my RELENG_7 machine with the new ZFS
merged
in, and it seems to have gone mostly trouble-free. I noticed one
weirdness
that could be
Hi everybody,
with 32 LUNs in 7.2 (mpt_cam.h, line 3608 cpi-max_lun = 32)
booting takes about 15 minues (7.0 the above change was about 3 minutes)
after 16 times the messages below
run_interrupt_driven_hooks: still waiting after 60 seconds for xpt_config
mpt0: request 0xfffe8029f960:359
Hallo Freebsd-stable,
Ich habe dich vor einiger Zeit eingeladen Facebook beizutreten. Sobald du dich
registrierst, können wir online in Verbindung treten, Fotos miteinander teilen,
Gruppen und Veranstaltungen organisieren und noch viel mehr.
Grüße,
Wolfgang
Um dich für Facebook zu
On Thu, May 21, 2009 at 11:47:54AM +0200, Attilio Rao wrote:
Please try the patch here:
http://www.freebsd.org/~attilio/notify.diff
As promised I checked againts 7.2-STABLE of today (cvsup ended
at 15:17 CEST, GTM+2, Italy time with DST) and ... it works !
(added and removed a disk 4 times,
Hi,
I just cvsupped the lastest 7.2-STABLE
and after
cd /usr/src
make clean
make -j8 buildworld
make buildkernel KERNCONF=ZFSSERVER
I encounter
cc -c -O2 -frename-registers -pipe -fno-strict-aliasing -std=c99 -g -Wall
-Wredundant-decls -Wnested-externs -Wstrict-prototypes
Hmm, I've had a bit of a miserable afternoon trying to fight my RELENG_7
server, which now doesn't boot. :(.
So, it's a ZRAID2 pool with a ufs/gmirror root partition split over 5
disks (gmirror on 500Mb partition on each of five disks, and zraid2 over
the rest of each drive).
What I did was
TB --- 2009-05-21 17:47:04 - tinderbox 2.6 running on freebsd-stable.sentex.ca
TB --- 2009-05-21 17:47:04 - starting RELENG_7 tinderbox run for amd64/amd64
TB --- 2009-05-21 17:47:04 - cleaning the object tree
TB --- 2009-05-21 17:47:39 - cvsupping the source tree
TB --- 2009-05-21 17:47:39 -
On Wednesday 20 May 2009 06:43:13 pm Kip Macy wrote:
The MFC went in r192498. Please let me know if you have any problems.
So far so good here (amd64, Core2 Duo, ICH9 SATA) but I'm too chicken to
upgrade the on-disk format yet.
--
Kirk Strauser
___
All looking good here - 3rd DNS server is now running new ZFS with an
upgraded pool, and I jsut did a server in the office which is running
a database and filesderver, also upgrading the pool. These are all amd64
systems, and the vm backpressure system seems to work nicely - in that
the kernel
On Thursday 21 May 2009 09:12:14 am Louis Mamakos wrote:
Any pointers to running multiple jails with ZFS? I was looking for
something like a union-mount capability for ZFS. I don't necessarily
need a jail to run divergent /bin, /usr/local, etc. just the
isolation. Making a clone doesn't
On Wed, 20 May 2009, Kip Macy wrote:
KM I will be MFC'ing the newer ZFS support some time this afternoon. Both
KM world and kernel will need to be re-built. Existing pools will
KM continue to work without upgrade.
KM
KM
KM If you choose to upgrade a pool to take advantage of new features you
KM
Looks like a (corrupted) space management bug. I'll take a closer look
this weekend to see if it can be recovered from.
-Kip
On Thu, May 21, 2009 at 12:50 PM, Dmitry Morozovsky ma...@rinet.ru wrote:
On Wed, 20 May 2009, Kip Macy wrote:
KM I will be MFC'ing the newer ZFS support some time this
At 03:35 PM 5/21/2009, Kirk Strauser wrote:
On Wednesday 20 May 2009 06:43:13 pm Kip Macy wrote:
The MFC went in r192498. Please let me know if you have any problems.
So far so good here (amd64, Core2 Duo, ICH9 SATA) but I'm too chicken to
upgrade the on-disk format yet.
I did an update on
I did an update on one of my less critical boxes today. I upgraded the
version as well to lucky 13 :) So far so good! I am rsyncing a few hundred
GB to it now. One thing I noticed, and not sure if this is normal because
of the compression, the capacity shows 31%, df shows 13%
Your
Every time I create/mount or unmount/detach a MFS filesystem,
powerd would *immediately* react with something like the
following:
### mdmfs -s 200m md /mfs
load 200%, current freq 600 MHz ( 9), wanted freq 1092 MHz
changing clock speed from 600 MHz to 1200 MHz
load 4%, current freq 1200
On 5/21/09 4:15 PM, Kip Macy wrote:
Your snapshots are using two thirds of your used capacity. 'df' only
knows about the mounted file system.
Cheers,
Kip
On that subject, if anyone isn't aware this version of zfs has nicer
space accounting.
you should check out the output of
zfs list -o
On Thursday 21 May 2009 04:32:56 am Lorenzo Perone wrote:
* dancing around with loud music csupping all over the place... *
I'll know I've been hacking too long when my music starts csupping all
over the place.. :)
Ditto though, huge thanks to Kip!
JN
39 matches
Mail list logo
