I have a box that has paniced two nights in a row with this error. I have
a corefile from last night, but tonight's failed:
Uptime: 23h55m22s
Physical memory: 6130 MB
Dumping 759 MB: 744 728 712 696 680 664 648
** DUMP FAILED (ERROR 16) **
Here's some info from the core I do have:
#0
On 25-2-2010 23:59, Jack Vogel wrote:
The failure to setup receive structures means it did not have sufficient
mbufs
to setup the RX ring and buffer structs. Not sure why this results in a
lockup,
but try and increase kern.ipc.nmbclusters.
Let me know what happens,
I've doubled the value
On 26-2-2010 10:58, Gerrit Kühn wrote:
On Fri, 26 Feb 2010 10:34:41 +0100 Willem Jan Withagenw...@digiware.nl
wrote about Re: em0 freezes on ZFS server:
WJW Probably the reason why this happened yesterday is that I started
WJW doing major software builds (over ZFS/NFS/TCP/v3) against data
On Fri, 26 Feb 2010 10:34:41 +0100 Willem Jan Withagen w...@digiware.nl
wrote about Re: em0 freezes on ZFS server:
WJW Probably the reason why this happened yesterday is that I started
WJW doing major software builds (over ZFS/NFS/TCP/v3) against data stored
WJW on this box.
I saw a similar
On Thu, 25 Feb 2010 14:59:28 -0800 Jack Vogel jfvo...@gmail.com wrote
about Re: em0 freezes on ZFS server:
JV The failure to setup receive structures means it did not have
JV sufficient mbufs
JV to setup the RX ring and buffer structs.
I don't know if this is related, but I updated an amd64 zfs
Hi,
When everything is life is just smoothly flowing by, and all is hunky-dory,
some things don't get the credits they deserve.
So here we go ;)
Standing at the coffee machine this morning I realized that FreeBSD has been
part of my professional life for already way, way too long.
On Sat, 20 Feb 2010 15:35:46 -0800
Jeremy Chadwick free...@jdc.parodius.com wrote:
After five days - a new crash. From /var/log/messages:
Feb 26 00:57:39 kg-f2 ntpd[55453]: kernel time sync status change 6001
Feb 26 01:39:40 kg-f2 kernel: ata5: port is not ready (timeout 1ms) tfd =
007f
On Fri, Feb 26, 2010 at 11:03:37AM +0100, Torfinn Ingolfsen wrote:
What exact disks (e.g. adX) are attached to ata5 and ata6?
r...@kg-f2# dmesg | grep ata5
ata5: ATA channel 3 on atapci0
ata5: [ITHREAD]
ad10: 953869MB SAMSUNG HD103SJ 1AJ100E4 at ata5-master UDMA100 SATA 3Gb/s
r...@kg-f2#
On Fri, 26 Feb 2010 11:03:37 +0100
Torfinn Ingolfsen torf...@broadpark.no wrote:
I will try that now. It might take five days or more to get an answer.
Or not. Another panic. Output from /var/log/messages:
Feb 26 11:10:33 kg-f2 ntpd[942]: kernel time sync status change 2001
Feb 26 11:44:19
On Thu, 25 Feb 2010 14:59:28 -0800 Jack Vogel jfvo...@gmail.com wrote
about Re: em0 freezes on ZFS server:
JV The failure to setup receive structures means it did not have
JV sufficient mbufs
JV to setup the RX ring and buffer structs.
I'm monitoring mbufs since I rebooted my server. Right now
On Fri, Feb 26, 2010 at 10:34:41AM +0100, Willem Jan Withagen wrote:
This is wat netstat -m told me when it refused to revive em0:
Below are the netstat -m counters/lines of concern:
24980/2087/27067 mbufs in use (current/cache/total)
24530/1070/25600/25600 mbuf clusters in use
On 26-2-2010 13:03, Jeremy Chadwick wrote:
On Fri, Feb 26, 2010 at 10:34:41AM +0100, Willem Jan Withagen wrote:
This is wat netstat -m told me when it refused to revive em0:
Below are the netstat -m counters/lines of concern:
24980/2087/27067 mbufs in use (current/cache/total)
On 26-2-2010 13:16, Gerrit Kühn wrote:
On Thu, 25 Feb 2010 14:59:28 -0800 Jack Vogeljfvo...@gmail.com wrote
about Re: em0 freezes on ZFS server:
JV The failure to setup receive structures means it did not have
JV sufficient mbufs
JV to setup the RX ring and buffer structs.
I'm monitoring
John J. Rushford wrote:
I'm running into the same problem, mpt(4) panic on FreeBSD 8-STABLE.
I'm running FreeBSD 8.0-STABLE, the current kernel was cvsup'd and built
@ January 14th, 2010. I cvsup'd tonight, 2/25/2010, and built a new
kernel. Attached is the panic when I tried to boot into
On Fri, 26 Feb 2010 04:03:39 -0800 Jeremy Chadwick
free...@jdc.parodius.com wrote about Re: em0 freezes on ZFS server:
JC Note how close the current value is to that of total. I'm not too
JC surprised you're seeing what you are as a result of this. What on
JC earth is this machine doing at all
On Fri, 26 Feb 2010 13:31:38 +0100 Gerrit Kühn
ger...@pmp.uni-hannover.de wrote about Re: em0 freezes on ZFS server:
GK JC Note how close the current value is to that of total. I'm not
GK JC too surprised you're seeing what you are as a result of this.
GK JC What on earth is this machine doing
On 26-2-2010 13:44, Gerrit Kühn wrote:
On Fri, 26 Feb 2010 13:31:38 +0100 Gerrit Kühn
ger...@pmp.uni-hannover.de wrote about Re: em0 freezes on ZFS server:
GK JC Note how close the current value is to that of total. I'm not
GK JC too surprised you're seeing what you are as a result of
On Fri, 26 Feb 2010 15:04:37 +0200 Daniel Braniss da...@cs.huji.ac.il
wrote about Re: em0 freezes on ZFS server :
DB At least in my case I found out what is eating the buffers: nfsd
DB does! The buffers stop increasing as soon as I stop nfsd. However,
DB they start increasing as soon as I
On Fri, 26 Feb 2010 13:31:38 +0100 Gerrit Kühn
ger...@pmp.uni-hannover.de wrote about Re: em0 freezes on ZFS server:
GK JC Note how close the current value is to that of total. I'm not
GK JC too surprised you're seeing what you are as a result of this.
GK JC What on earth is this machine
COOL! THANKS a LOT Alexander!
Can't believe it. You post a panic at 11pm and get a patch at 1pm next
day...? You must be crazy! ;)
Works for me. I patched against 8/stable. I'll be testing the machine a
bit more. But for now, no panics!
I guess the patch should be committed soon, also
Have a nice time!
Got some trouble. The Sysinstall program of FreeBSD 8.0 release does
not define SATA hard drives. Can`t create slices.
But that machine works correctly by Windows.
See attached dmesg file.
Please, let me know, what mast i do?
Many thanks for the help.
---
Ванкувер 2010.
On Fri, 26 Feb 2010 15:04:37 +0200 Daniel Braniss da...@cs.huji.ac.il
wrote about Re: em0 freezes on ZFS server :
DB At least in my case I found out what is eating the buffers: nfsd
DB does! The buffers stop increasing as soon as I stop nfsd. However,
DB they start increasing as soon as
On Fri, Feb 26, 2010 at 05:21:52PM +0300, oleg wrote:
Got some trouble. The Sysinstall program of FreeBSD 8.0 release does
not define SATA hard drives. Can`t create slices.
But that machine works correctly by Windows.
See attached dmesg file.
The hard disks are seen by the system as classic
Hello,
On 26 Feb 2010, at 15:21, oleg wrote:
Got some trouble. The Sysinstall program of FreeBSD 8.0 release does
not define SATA hard drives. Can`t create slices.
But that machine works correctly by Windows.
See attached dmesg file.
The dmesg you attached is from FreeBSD 6.1, not 8.0. It
On Fri, Feb 26, 2010 at 07:19:25AM -0800, Jeremy Chadwick wrote:
On Fri, Feb 26, 2010 at 05:21:52PM +0300, oleg wrote:
Got some trouble. The Sysinstall program of FreeBSD 8.0 release does
not define SATA hard drives. Can`t create slices.
But that machine works correctly by Windows.
See
On 26-2-2010 16:07, Daniel Braniss wrote:
On Fri, 26 Feb 2010 15:04:37 +0200 Daniel Branissda...@cs.huji.ac.il
wrote about Re: em0 freezes on ZFS server :
DBAt least in my case I found out what is eating the buffers: nfsd
DBdoes! The buffers stop increasing as soon as I stop nfsd.
when I have enough data i'll plot it.
check:
ftp://ftp.cs.huji.ac.il/users/danny/freebsd/plot.ps
x is seconds, y is mbus current.
Cheers,
danny
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
On Fri, 26 Feb 2010 17:07:13 +0200 Daniel Braniss da...@cs.huji.ac.il
wrote about Re: em0 freezes on ZFS server :
DB it's only purpose in life is a nfs server.
I thought so, but you did not mention it explicitely.
DB but I wouldn't exclude zfs from the equation yet.
DB I have othere nfs
On Fri, 26 Feb 2010 17:41:02 +0200 Daniel Braniss da...@cs.huji.ac.il
wrote about Re: em0 freezes on ZFS server :
DB check:
DB ftp://ftp.cs.huji.ac.il/users/danny/freebsd/plot.ps
DB x is seconds, y is mbus current.
Looks not as bad as mine. I had 37k when I rebooted the machine some
minutes
On Fri, 26 Feb 2010 07:19:25 -0800
Jeremy Chadwick free...@jdc.parodius.com wrote:
On Fri, Feb 26, 2010 at 05:21:52PM +0300, oleg wrote:
Got some trouble. The Sysinstall program of FreeBSD 8.0 release does
not define SATA hard drives. Can`t create slices.
But that machine works correctly by
Hello,
Just encountered a panic when starting pf (/etc/rc.d/pf start) on a
FreeBSD benjamin 8.0-STABLE
uname -a
FreeBSD 8.0-STABLE #0: Fri Feb 26 18:33:44 UTC 2010
r...@benjamin:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/BYTESATWORK_R8_INTEL_DEBUG amd64
the system is a Dell PowerEdge R300 with bge
On Fri, 26 Feb 2010, Lorenzo Perone wrote:
Hi,
While I was just planning to experiment with VIMAGE, and it is not required
for production (I'm aware of the message of it being experimental...), I
thought it might be useful to report it. Please send me a note if I should
file a pr.
The
I just updated my gateway machine to 7.3-PRERELEASE and immediately noticed
that natd no longer started (hard to miss, no outside network access).
It looks like the MFC of the firewall_coscripts function may be the cause
(cvs rev 1.15.2.3 to /usr/src/etc/rc.d/ipfw). These changes add the two
On Fri, 26 Feb 2010 17:41:02 +0200 Daniel Braniss da...@cs.huji.ac.il
wrote about Re: em0 freezes on ZFS server :
DB check:
DB ftp://ftp.cs.huji.ac.il/users/danny/freebsd/plot.ps
DB x is seconds, y is mbus current.
Looks not as bad as mine. I had 37k when I rebooted the machine some
Hi,
I had the same problem, I have updated the source tree and recompile the
kernel but the problem is still unresolved..
pf + vimage = kernel crash problem was also reported as a bug..
http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=143808cat=
Regards,
Onur.
On 2/26/2010 8:18 PM, Lorenzo
On Fri, 26 Feb 2010 22:09:32 +0200 Daniel Braniss da...@cs.huji.ac.il
wrote about Re: mbuf leakage with nfs/zfs? (was: em0 freezes on ZFS
server) :
DB Furthermore I found this via Google:
DB
http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-current/2009-December/014062.html.
This did not help, I
On Fri, 26 Feb 2010 22:09:32 +0200 Daniel Braniss da...@cs.huji.ac.il
wrote about Re: mbuf leakage with nfs/zfs? (was: em0 freezes on ZFS
server) :
DB at the moment there is not much activity, but if you check the latest
DB plot.ps you will see that the bottom is slowly increasing, so my bet
DB
On 26-2-2010 22:43, Gerrit Kühn wrote:
DB I'll have to do some packet snooping to check if it's TCP or UDP nfs
DB traffic, since some of the clients are Linux ...
I have Linux clients, too. Some use tcp, some udp.
I have Linux and FreeBSD clients running. The build system runs on
Linux.
On Fri, Feb 05, 2010 at 10:31:37AM +1300, Jonathan Chen wrote:
On Thu, Feb 04, 2010 at 11:23:15AM -0800, Pyun YongHyeon wrote:
On Thu, Feb 04, 2010 at 03:00:15PM +1300, Jonathan Chen wrote:
On Wed, Feb 03, 2010 at 05:25:03PM -0800, Pyun YongHyeon wrote:
[...]
I'm not sure but recently
TB --- 2010-02-26 21:24:43 - tinderbox 2.6 running on freebsd-current.sentex.ca
TB --- 2010-02-26 21:24:43 - starting RELENG_8 tinderbox run for powerpc/powerpc
TB --- 2010-02-26 21:24:43 - cleaning the object tree
TB --- 2010-02-26 21:25:00 - cvsupping the source tree
TB --- 2010-02-26 21:25:00 -
TB --- 2010-02-26 21:41:33 - tinderbox 2.6 running on freebsd-current.sentex.ca
TB --- 2010-02-26 21:41:33 - starting RELENG_8 tinderbox run for sparc64/sparc64
TB --- 2010-02-26 21:41:33 - cleaning the object tree
TB --- 2010-02-26 21:41:48 - cvsupping the source tree
TB --- 2010-02-26 21:41:48 -
Thanks very much Alexander, I'll test t the patch this weekend.
John
Lorenzo Perone wrote:
COOL! THANKS a LOT Alexander!
Can't believe it. You post a panic at 11pm and get a patch at 1pm next
day...? You must be crazy! ;)
Works for me. I patched against 8/stable. I'll be testing the
On Fri, 26 Feb 2010 23:12:39 +0100 Willem Jan Withagen w...@digiware.nl
wrote about Re: mbuf leakage with nfs/zfs?:
WJW Mine are now:
WJW 41533/2402/43935 mbufs in use (current/cache/total)
WJW 41454/1572/43026/262144 mbuf clusters in use (current/cache/total/max)
WJW 39241/823 mbuf+clusters out
On Fri, 26 Feb 2010 23:12:39 +0100 Willem Jan Withagen w...@digiware.nl
wrote about Re: mbuf leakage with nfs/zfs?:
WJW DB I'll have to do some packet snooping to check if it's TCP or
WJW DB UDP nfs traffic, since some of the clients are Linux ...
WJW I have Linux clients, too. Some
44 matches
Mail list logo
