On 2011-08-02 0:49, Claus Guttesen wrote:
Do you happen to run nfs on the server?
I had weird problems with igb-timeouts when many nfs-reads occured
and a down and up on the interface would restore the network
connection for a while. I had vmware-servers on a nfs-share and
either when booting
On 2011-08-02 1:00, Jeremy Chadwick wrote:
On Tue, Aug 02, 2011 at 12:27:57AM +0200, Willem Jan Withagen wrote:
A server just all of a sudden dropped from the network.
uptime was 26days.
This got my ZFS server hanging:
Aug 1 23:39:58 zfs kernel: em0: Watchdog timeout -- resetting
Aug 1
Hi there,
I Googled around and checked the PRs and wasn't successful in finding
any reports of what I'm seeing. I'm hoping someone here can help me
debug what's going on.
On my FreeBSD 8.2-S machine (built circa 12th June), I created a
directory and populated it over the course of 3 weeks with
Not an in depth solution for ZFS, but maybe a solution for you.
mkdir images2
mv images/* images2
rmdir images
Ronald.
On Tue, 02 Aug 2011 09:39:03 +0200, seanr...@gmail.com
seanr...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi there,
I Googled around and checked the PRs and wasn't successful in finding
any
On Tue, Aug 02, 2011 at 08:39:03AM +0100, seanr...@gmail.com wrote:
On my FreeBSD 8.2-S machine (built circa 12th June), I created a
directory and populated it over the course of 3 weeks with about 2
million individual files.
I'll keep this real simple:
Why did you do this?
I hope this was a
inline
On Tue, Aug 2, 2011 at 10:08 AM, Jeremy Chadwick
free...@jdc.parodius.com wrote:
On Tue, Aug 02, 2011 at 08:39:03AM +0100, seanr...@gmail.com wrote:
On my FreeBSD 8.2-S machine (built circa 12th June), I created a
directory and populated it over the course of 3 weeks with about 2
On Tue, Aug 2, 2011 at 9:39 AM, seanr...@gmail.com seanr...@gmail.com wrote:
On my FreeBSD 8.2-S machine (built circa 12th June), I created a
directory and populated it over the course of 3 weeks with about 2
million individual files. As you might imagine, a 'ls' of this
directory took quite
On Tue, Aug 02, 2011 at 10:16:35AM +0100, seanr...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Aug 2, 2011 at 10:08 AM, Jeremy Chadwick
free...@jdc.parodius.com wrote:
On Tue, Aug 02, 2011 at 08:39:03AM +0100, seanr...@gmail.com wrote:
On my FreeBSD 8.2-S machine (built circa 12th June), I created a
On 02/08/2011, at 19:12, Jeremy Chadwick wrote:
When I was being taught the ropes of system administration at Oregon
State, the team of crotchety UNIX admins there made it quite clear that
there were things you just Did Not Do(tm) to computer systems. Shoving
thousands of files into a single
On 02/08/2011, at 18:38, Jeremy Chadwick wrote:
On Tue, Aug 02, 2011 at 08:39:03AM +0100, seanr...@gmail.com wrote:
On my FreeBSD 8.2-S machine (built circa 12th June), I created a
directory and populated it over the course of 3 weeks with about 2
million individual files.
I'll keep this
On 02.08.11 12:46, Daniel O'Connor wrote:
I am pretty sure UFS does not have this problem. i.e. once you
delete/move the files out of the directory its performance would be
good again.
UFS would be the classic example of poor performance if you do this.
If it is a limitation in ZFS it
On Tue, Aug 2, 2011 at 11:10 AM, Daniel Kalchev dan...@digsys.bg wrote:
If it is a limitation in ZFS it would be nice to know that, perhaps it
truly, really is a bug that can be avoided (or it's inherent in the way ZFS
handles such things)
It is possible that there is not enough memory in
9.0 Beta1 Panic
Hi guys,
I just downloaded and install 9.0 BETA1 but it panics on ACPI. Please view
attached screenshot for the error. If you need more information, do let us know.
Thanks.
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
On Tue, Aug 02, 2011 at 11:55:43AM +0100, seanr...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Aug 2, 2011 at 11:10 AM, Daniel Kalchev dan...@digsys.bg wrote:
If it is a limitation in ZFS it would be nice to know that, perhaps it
truly, really is a bug that can be avoided (or it's inherent in the way ZFS
Hello, Martin Wilke!
On Tue, Aug 02, 2011 at 12:41:29PM +0800
m...@freebsd.org wrote about 9.0 B1 Panic:
9.0 Beta1 Panic
Hi guys,
I just downloaded and install 9.0 BETA1 but it panics on ACPI. Please view
attached screenshot for the error. If you need more information, do let us
On Tue, Aug 02, 2011 at 02:58:09PM +0400, Lystopad Olexandr wrote:
Hello, Martin Wilke!
On Tue, Aug 02, 2011 at 12:41:29PM +0800
m...@freebsd.org wrote about 9.0 B1 Panic:
9.0 Beta1 Panic
Hi guys,
I just downloaded and install 9.0 BETA1 but it panics on ACPI. Please view
On Tuesday, August 02, 2011 12:41:29 am Martin Wilke wrote:
9.0 Beta1 Panic
Hi guys,
I just downloaded and install 9.0 BETA1 but it panics on ACPI. Please view
attached screenshot for the error. If you need more information, do let us
know.
Thanks.
Unfortunately the attachment was
On Tue, Aug 2, 2011 at 12:07 PM, Jeremy Chadwick
free...@jdc.parodius.com wrote:
On Tue, Aug 02, 2011 at 11:55:43AM +0100, seanr...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Aug 2, 2011 at 11:10 AM, Daniel Kalchev dan...@digsys.bg wrote:
If it is a limitation in ZFS it would be nice to know that, perhaps it
On 02/08/2011 11:10, Daniel Kalchev wrote:
Other than that, perhaps in ZFS it would be easier to prune the unused
directory entries, than it is in UFS. It looks like this is not
implemented.
Remember that ZFS uses copy-on-write for all filesystem updates. Any
change to a directory contents
On Aug 2, 2011, at 6:58 PM, Lystopad Olexandr wrote:
Hello, Martin Wilke!
On Tue, Aug 02, 2011 at 12:41:29PM +0800
m...@freebsd.org wrote about 9.0 B1 Panic:
9.0 Beta1 Panic
Hi guys,
I just downloaded and install 9.0 BETA1 but it panics on ACPI. Please view
attached screenshot for
On Tuesday, August 02, 2011 8:58:10 am Martin Wilke wrote:
On Aug 2, 2011, at 6:58 PM, Lystopad Olexandr wrote:
Hello, Martin Wilke!
On Tue, Aug 02, 2011 at 12:41:29PM +0800
m...@freebsd.org wrote about 9.0 B1 Panic:
9.0 Beta1 Panic
Hi guys,
I just downloaded and install
Hi,
just finished installing FreeBSD-9BETA1 and recompiling the kernel with
dtrace.
This is even worse, I have the same behavior as mentioned here:
http://freebsd.1045724.n5.nabble.com/bin-158431-dtrace-crash-in-dt-proc-lookup-when-attaching-to-PID-assert-dpr-NULL-tt4535367.html#none
i.e.,
Hi,
This is even worse, I have the same behavior as mentioned here:
http://freebsd.1045724.n5.nabble.com/bin-158431-dtrace-crash-in-dt-proc-lookup-when-attaching-to-PID-assert-dpr-NULL-tt4535367.html#none
i.e., dtrace regardless of whether with or without any probes just quits
with the
On Tue, 02 Aug 2011 12:55:43 +0200, seanr...@gmail.com
seanr...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Aug 2, 2011 at 11:10 AM, Daniel Kalchev dan...@digsys.bg wrote:
If it is a limitation in ZFS it would be nice to know that, perhaps it
truly, really is a bug that can be avoided (or it's inherent in the
I upgraded a RELENG_8 box from a kernel from ~ June 15th to one today to
get some of the zfs and bind updates and on reboot, the box panic'd
twice, and booted fine the third time. I have not seen this error
before and not sure if its a hardware issue, or some odd timing issue I
ran into ?
on 02/08/2011 20:46 maestro something said the following:
Hi,
just finished installing FreeBSD-9BETA1 and recompiling the kernel with
dtrace.
This is even worse, I have the same behavior as mentioned here:
on 03/08/2011 00:03 Andriy Gapon said the following:
I tried to run dtruss (as you did) and I got this pre-amble before the
assertion:
[some dtrace script body]
: probe description proc:::exit does not match any probes
I guess that in my case I got it because my userland was not compiled
On Aug 3, 2011, at 12:56 AM, John Baldwin wrote:
On Tuesday, August 02, 2011 8:58:10 am Martin Wilke wrote:
On Aug 2, 2011, at 6:58 PM, Lystopad Olexandr wrote:
Hello, Martin Wilke!
On Tue, Aug 02, 2011 at 12:41:29PM +0800
m...@freebsd.org wrote about 9.0 B1 Panic:
9.0 Beta1 Panic
Hi,
http://freebsd.1045724.n5.nabble.com/bin-158431-dtrace-crash-in-dt-proc-lookup-when-attaching-to-PID-assert-dpr-NULL-tt4535367.html#none
Kind of a mentoring note: it would be much shorter and much more useful to
paste
PR 158431 or, even better, an http URL to the said PR in FreeBSD PR
Hi,
diff --git a/lib/libproc/proc_create.c b/lib/libproc/proc_create.c
index c372a47..9bd24a2 100644
--- a/lib/libproc/proc_create.c
+++ b/lib/libproc/proc_create.c
@@ -79,12 +79,11 @@ proc_attach(pid_t pid, int flags, struct proc_handle
**pphdl)
else
phdl-status =
On Tue, Aug 02, 2011 at 04:54:38PM -0400, Mike Tancsa wrote:
I upgraded a RELENG_8 box from a kernel from ~ June 15th to one today to
get some of the zfs and bind updates and on reboot, the box panic'd
twice, and booted fine the third time. I have not seen this error
before and not sure if
On Tue, Aug 2, 2011 at 3:46 PM, maestro something maestr...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
diff --git a/lib/libproc/proc_create.c b/lib/libproc/proc_create.c
index c372a47..9bd24a2 100644
--- a/lib/libproc/proc_create.c
+++ b/lib/libproc/proc_create.c
@@ -79,12 +79,11 @@ proc_attach(pid_t pid, int
Hi,
Hi,
diff --git a/lib/libproc/proc_create.c b/lib/libproc/proc_create.c
index c372a47..9bd24a2 100644
--- a/lib/libproc/proc_create.c
+++ b/lib/libproc/proc_create.c
@@ -79,12 +79,11 @@ proc_attach(pid_t pid, int flags, struct proc_handle
**pphdl)
else
33 matches
Mail list logo
