[Bug 207463] [patch] stable/10/sys/netpfil/pf/pf_ioctl.c:pfioctl(DIOCRSETADDRS) buffer overflow

2016-03-02 Thread bugzilla-noreply
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=207463 --- Comment #5 from commit-h...@freebsd.org --- A commit references this bug: Author: kp Date: Thu Mar 3 07:16:36 UTC 2016 New revision: 296340 URL: https://svnweb.freebsd.org/changeset/base/296340 Log: MFC: r296025: pf: Fix

Re: /dev/led soekris 6501.

2016-03-02 Thread Peter Ankerstål
On 03/03/2016 04:18 AM, Tom Samplonius wrote: How come there is no support for “ready" and “error" leds on the soekris 6501 even though it seems fairly easy to control them? a) perhaps no developer have that board? b) nobody has written the necessary code to do so? c) There is no

Re: svn commit: r295367 - in stable/10: crypto/openssh crypto/openssh/contrib crypto/openssh/contrib/caldera crypto/openssh/contrib/cygwin crypto/openssh/contrib/redhat crypto/openssh/contrib/suse cry

2016-03-02 Thread Dag-Erling Smørgrav
Mike Tancsa writes: > I noticed on a server that I updated on Friday that incorporates > r295367, some lightweight clients that were using aes128-cbc are now > failing to connect. Is this a planned change ? If so, perhaps a heads > up in UPDATING ? Please file a bug and send me

Re: /dev/led soekris 6501.

2016-03-02 Thread Tom Samplonius
>> >> How come there is no support for “ready" and “error" leds on the soekris >> 6501 even though it seems fairly easy to control them? >> > > a) perhaps no developer have that board? > b) nobody has written the necessary code to do so? > c) There is no generally accepted meaning for what

Re: Why must X open TCP by default?

2016-03-02 Thread Chris H
On Wed, 2 Mar 2016 20:50:11 -0500 kpn...@pobox.com wrote > On Wed, Mar 02, 2016 at 02:54:53PM -0800, Chris H wrote: > > #!/bin/sh - > > /usr/local/bin/startx -- -nolisten tcp > > > > exit > > > > which seems to get the job done, and allow me to be lazy > > at the CLI. :-) > > Personally, I'd

Re: problems with powerd and cpufreq on AMD Quad-Core A8-4555M

2016-03-02 Thread John
On Mon, Feb 29, 2016 at 03:28:37PM +1100, Dewayne Geraghty wrote: That's a nuisance! As I said, IF I load the module before the kernel, I'm good as follows. However if I load after booting, then I don't have any frequencies to choose from. I'm afraid the only "help" I can provide is of my

Re: Process stuck in "vnread"

2016-03-02 Thread Maxim Sobolev
Thanks Ronald, I think this is at least a possibility that it's related, I've bumped myself up to the latest FreeBSD 10.3-BETA3 (svn revision 296326) and compiled nullfs statically, so I'll run those builds and see how it goes. -Max On Wed, Mar 2, 2016 at 1:32 AM, Ronald Klop

Re: Why must X open TCP by default?

2016-03-02 Thread Chris H
On Wed, 2 Mar 2016 15:59:57 -0500 Brandon Allbery wrote > On Wed, Mar 2, 2016 at 3:56 PM, Chris H wrote: > > > Good catch, by both you, and Brandon. I just tried it. But > > sockstat(1) still reports 6000 being open. Closing the X > > server, and

Re: Why must X open TCP by default?

2016-03-02 Thread Brandon Allbery
On Wed, Mar 2, 2016 at 3:56 PM, Chris H wrote: > Good catch, by both you, and Brandon. I just tried it. But > sockstat(1) still reports 6000 being open. Closing the X > server, and session, reveal that 6000 is no longer open. > Bummer. > Check `man 7 Xserver` to verify

Re: Why must X open TCP by default?

2016-03-02 Thread Chris H
On Wed, 2 Mar 2016 12:44:18 -0800 Freddie Cash wrote > On Wed, Mar 2, 2016 at 12:40 PM, Chris H wrote: > > > Hello, > > This is regarding 9-STABLE. All of the 9-STABLE boxes > > that have Xorg installed, and running on them, insist on > > opening TCP

Re: svn commit: r296317 - in stable/10: crypto/openssl crypto/openssl/apps crypto/openssl/crypto crypto/openssl/crypto/bio crypto/openssl/crypto/bn crypto/openssl/crypto/bn/asm crypto/openssl/crypto/d

2016-03-02 Thread Mike Tancsa
On 3/2/2016 3:40 PM, Xin LI wrote: > Hrm this is really weird! Sorry I can't debug this right now, but > please do keep us posted if you have new findings. > > One quick guess: Can you confirm if your system clock is correct? The strange thing is that I did it on 2 other boxes and could not

Re: Why must X open TCP by default?

2016-03-02 Thread Brandon Allbery
On Wed, Mar 2, 2016 at 3:40 PM, Chris H wrote: > startx -nolisten tcp That would pass it to the session, not the server. startx -- -nolisten tcp (startx [[/path/to/session/start] session parameters] [-- [/path/to/server] [:display] server parameters], see xinit

Re: Why must X open TCP by default?

2016-03-02 Thread Freddie Cash
On Wed, Mar 2, 2016 at 12:40 PM, Chris H wrote: > Hello, > This is regarding 9-STABLE. All of the 9-STABLE boxes > that have Xorg installed, and running on them, insist on > opening TCP port 6000; as reported by sockstat(1) > > Xorg 1295 1 tcp6 *:6000

Why must X open TCP by default?

2016-03-02 Thread Chris H
Hello, This is regarding 9-STABLE. All of the 9-STABLE boxes that have Xorg installed, and running on them, insist on opening TCP port 6000; as reported by sockstat(1) Xorg 1295 1 tcp6 *:6000*:* Xorg 1295 3 tcp4 *:6000*:* I see that the

Re: svn commit: r296317 - in stable/10: crypto/openssl crypto/openssl/apps crypto/openssl/crypto crypto/openssl/crypto/bio crypto/openssl/crypto/bn crypto/openssl/crypto/bn/asm crypto/openssl/crypto/d

2016-03-02 Thread Xin LI
Hrm this is really weird! Sorry I can't debug this right now, but please do keep us posted if you have new findings. One quick guess: Can you confirm if your system clock is correct? Cheers, On Wed, Mar 2, 2016 at 12:10 PM, Mike Tancsa wrote: > On 3/2/2016 10:43 AM, Xin LI

Re: ahci-timeout regression in beta3

2016-03-02 Thread John Baldwin
On Monday, February 29, 2016 07:29:03 PM Harry Schmalzbauer wrote: > Bezüglich Harry Schmalzbauer's Nachricht vom 28.02.2016 20:55 (localtime): > > Hello, > > > > I have a remote machine with a probably defective ODD, but until r294989 > > (from Jan 28th) I could boot with just these warnings: >

Re: svn commit: r296317 - in stable/10: crypto/openssl crypto/openssl/apps crypto/openssl/crypto crypto/openssl/crypto/bio crypto/openssl/crypto/bn crypto/openssl/crypto/bn/asm crypto/openssl/crypto/d

2016-03-02 Thread Mike Tancsa
On 3/2/2016 10:43 AM, Xin LI wrote: > Author: delphij > Date: Wed Mar 2 15:43:01 2016 > New Revision: 296317 > URL: https://svnweb.freebsd.org/changeset/base/296317 > Hi, On installworld, I get ===> secure (install) ===> secure/lib (install) ===> secure/lib/libcrypto (install) install

Re: /dev/led soekris 6501.

2016-03-02 Thread Torfinn Ingolfsen
On Wed, 2 Mar 2016 18:21:15 +0100 Peter Ankerstål wrote: > Hi! > > How come there is no support for “ready" and “error" leds on the soekris 6501 > even though it seems fairly easy to control them? > > Please see >

/dev/led soekris 6501.

2016-03-02 Thread Peter Ankerstål
Hi! How come there is no support for “ready" and “error" leds on the soekris 6501 even though it seems fairly easy to control them? Please see http://www.mail-archive.com/soekris-tech@lists.soekris.com/msg06738.html and http://ross.vc/?p=183 smime.p7s Description: S/MIME cryptographic

Re: Process stuck in "vnread"

2016-03-02 Thread Maxim Sobolev
Sorry gmail hit set too early. Backtrace from the md worker: [Switching to thread 357 (Thread 101131)]#0 0x8095244e in sched_switch () (kgdb) bt #0 0x8095244e in sched_switch () #1 0x809313b1 in mi_switch () #2 0x8097089a in sleepq_wait () #3

Re: Process stuck in "vnread"

2016-03-02 Thread Konstantin Belousov
On Wed, Mar 02, 2016 at 03:02:02AM -0800, Maxim Sobolev wrote: > Thanks, Konstantin. > > Re: md(4) state: > >0 88688 0 0 -8 0 0 16 tx->tx_s DL- 0:45.43 > [md0] > > Its backtrace: So md is stuck in ZFS. ___

Re: Process stuck in "vnread"

2016-03-02 Thread Maxim Sobolev
Thanks, Konstantin. Re: md(4) state: 0 88688 0 0 -8 0 0 16 tx->tx_s DL- 0:45.43 [md0] Its backtrace: About the backtrace, indeed, looks like you are right and some portion of it is not decoded properly, as it's loaded as a kernel module. The setup is somewhat

Re: Problems with ucom/uftdi and sendfax on 10.2 p12 (works like a charm with 7.4)

2016-03-02 Thread Holger Kipp
Am 01.03.2016 um 23:08 schrieb Ian Lepore >: On Tue, 2016-03-01 at 19:58 +, Holger Kipp wrote: Hi all, I currently encounter a problem with sending faxes with new server and FreeBSD 10.2-RELEASE p12 using mgetty+sendfax and RS232-Modems via USB to

Re: Process stuck in "vnread"

2016-03-02 Thread Konstantin Belousov
On Wed, Mar 02, 2016 at 01:12:31AM -0800, Maxim Sobolev wrote: > Hi, I've encountered cp(1) process stuck in the vnread state on one of my > build machines that got recently upgraded to 10.3. > >0 79596 1 0 20 0 170921396 wait I 1 0:00.00 > /bin/sh

Re: Process stuck in "vnread"

2016-03-02 Thread Ronald Klop
Hello, Would it be possible this has to do with the resolved 'system hangs when using ZFS caused by VFS' in 10.3-BETA3? https://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-stable/2016-February/084238.html Regards, Ronald. On Wed, 02 Mar 2016 10:12:31 +0100, Maxim Sobolev

Process stuck in "vnread"

2016-03-02 Thread Maxim Sobolev
Hi, I've encountered cp(1) process stuck in the vnread state on one of my build machines that got recently upgraded to 10.3. 0 79596 1 0 20 0 170921396 wait I 1 0:00.00 /bin/sh /usr/local/bin/autoreconf -f -i 0 79602 79596 0 52 0 414889036 wait I