On Sat, 13 Apr 2013 14:41:46 +0300
Markiyan Kushnir markiyan.kush...@gmail.com wrote:
On 13.04.2013 11:29, Markiyan Kushnir wrote:
The only thing I would like to add -- tree lookup did
make a good effect
on CPU consumption.
John,
I'm just curious, did you consider sys/tree.h for tree
In the previous version (0.61), the process of checking
file names against the list of known files in the
repository was inefficient and most likely accounts for
the slow down you're seeing. I've reimplemented it using
a binary search tree and the lookup phase is no longer a
here is what I used to use (not 100% match, but quite close):
indent -bad -bap -bbb -d4 -di1 -fc1 -i4 -nip -npsl -nut $*
--
Markiyan.
On 13.04.2013 02:38, John Mehr wrote:
On Thu, 11 Apr 2013 01:39:32 -0700 (PDT)
mrb...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thursday, April 11, 2013 1:14:57 PM UTC+6,
The only thing I would like to add -- tree lookup did make a good effect
on CPU consumption.
--
Markiyan.
On 13.04.2013 10:38, mrb...@gmail.com wrote:
In the previous version (0.61), the process of checking
file names against the list of known files in the
repository was inefficient and most
On 13.04.2013 11:29, Markiyan Kushnir wrote:
The only thing I would like to add -- tree lookup did make a good effect
on CPU consumption.
John,
I'm just curious, did you consider sys/tree.h for tree implementation? I
realize that it wouldn't be well portable to Linux. Any way, did you
have
ok, looks like the mere fix to the strlen() call as you suggested
earlier doesn't resolve the issue of CPU eating up.
On 12.04.2013 08:43, mrb...@gmail.com wrote:
On Friday, April 12, 2013 1:09:53 AM UTC+6, Markiyan Kushnir wrote:
Another thing that might be worth of attention, the patched
On Friday, April 12, 2013 1:28:43 PM UTC+6, Markiyan Kushnir wrote:
It would be nice to get comparable time from svnup.
I think we could get comparable time only with svn. Sorry.
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
On Fri, 12 Apr 2013 10:28:10 +0300
Markiyan Kushnir markiyan.kush...@gmail.com wrote:
ok, looks like the mere fix to the strlen() call as you
suggested earlier doesn't resolve the issue of CPU eating
up.
On 12.04.2013 08:43, mrb...@gmail.com wrote:
On Friday, April 12, 2013 1:09:53 AM
On Thu, 11 Apr 2013 01:39:32 -0700 (PDT)
mrb...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thursday, April 11, 2013 1:14:57 PM UTC+6,
mrb...@gmail.com wrote:
I've placed the patched svnup.c (0.56), the diff and two
statically linked binaries on
http://ftp.ufanet.ru/pub/boco/freebsd/svnup/
I'm sorry,
On Sunday, March 24, 2013 9:57:12 AM UTC+6, Markiyan Kushnir wrote:
Tested svnup for a while, and I can say it does its job well, and works
basically as I would expect, so thanks for your initiative. Although it
appears to be quite resource greedy. Most of the time it showed
something like:
On Thursday, April 11, 2013 1:14:57 PM UTC+6, mrb...@gmail.com wrote:
I've placed the patched svnup.c (0.56), the diff and two statically linked
binaries on http://ftp.ufanet.ru/pub/boco/freebsd/svnup/
I'm sorry, svnup.c.diff is the patch against filtered thru indent svnup.c, with
different
On Thu, 11 Apr 2013, mrb...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sunday, March 24, 2013 9:57:12 AM UTC+6, Markiyan Kushnir wrote:
Tested svnup for a while, and I can say it does its job well, and works
basically as I would expect, so thanks for your initiative. Although it
appears to be quite resource
I'm sorry, but even ignoring all of your whitespace and style(9)
differences, your patch appears to go well beyond correcting a typo,
which I can't spot anyway, though I'm sure John will know what it is.
Care to explain a little more?
Sure. Typo is strlen(command - total_bytes_written)
I agree with Ian, there is no need to statically link to base libraries.
While not going into details of the patch, I can confirm no issues,
except of known ones, of course: ports/17, ports/177408.
Another thing that might be worth of attention, the patched version has
been again back
On 11.04.2013 20:42, Markiyan Kushnir wrote:
I agree with Ian, there is no need to statically link to base libraries.
While not going into details of the patch, I can confirm no issues,
except of known ones, of course: ports/17, ports/177408.
Another thing that might be worth of
On Friday, April 12, 2013 1:09:53 AM UTC+6, Markiyan Kushnir wrote:
Another thing that might be worth of attention, the patched version has
been again back to slower checkout time:
real91m38.824s
user0m26.216s
sys 0m13.858s
at 4 Mbit/s link, while the original 0.56 takes
On Tue, 9 Apr 2013 17:05:28 +0200
Patrick M. Hausen hau...@punkt.de wrote:
Hi, all,
first a big big thank you to John an all others involved
for all the work.
A bit more slowly than cvsup but definitely a lot more
convenient than
using plain subversion. Part of the slow performance may
Hi,
Am 09.04.2013 um 17:05 schrieb Patrick M. Hausen hau...@punkt.de:
PORTSSUPFILE= -b base/head -l /usr/ports
ports/head, of course.
Regards
Patrick M. Hausen
Leiter Netzwerke und Sicherheit
--
punkt.de GmbH * Kaiserallee 13a * 76133 Karlsruhe
Tel. 0721 9109 0 * Fax 0721 9109 100
Hi, all,
first a big big thank you to John an all others involved for all the work.
A bit more slowly than cvsup but definitely a lot more convenient than
using plain subversion. Part of the slow performance may be due to the
fact that there is no local German svn mirror, yet. I'll try with my
On 25.03.2013 02:55, John Mehr wrote:
On Sun, 24 Mar 2013 05:55:19 +0200
Markiyan Kushnir markiyan.kush...@gmail.com wrote:
Hello John,
Tested svnup for a while, and I can say it does its job well, and
works basically as I would expect, so thanks for your initiative.
Although it appears
Hi John,
I also measured svnup basic process resource usage, attaching a complete
plot (measurements were taken each 2 seconds based on ps(1) and
procstat(1)). Hopefully it will help you as well.
--
Markiyan.
On 31.03.2013 12:51, Markiyan Kushnir wrote:
On 25.03.2013 02:55, John Mehr
ups, sorry:
https://docs.google.com/file/d/0B9Q-zpUXxqCnRVVMTkk1blVfZzA/edit?usp=sharing
Please let me know if you have problems with accessing it.
--
Markiyan
On 31.03.2013 13:18, Kurt Jaeger wrote:
Hi!
I also measured svnup basic process resource usage, attaching a complete
plot
On 31.03.2013 13:07, Markiyan Kushnir wrote:
Hi John,
I also measured svnup basic process resource usage, attaching a complete
plot (measurements were taken each 2 seconds based on ps(1) and
procstat(1)). Hopefully it will help you as well.
(in case it's not available through the list)
On Sun, 24 Mar 2013 05:55:19 +0200
Markiyan Kushnir markiyan.kush...@gmail.com wrote:
Hello John,
Tested svnup for a while, and I can say it does its job
well, and works basically as I would expect, so thanks
for your initiative. Although it appears to be quite
resource greedy. Most of
Hello John,
Tested svnup for a while, and I can say it does its job well, and works
basically as I would expect, so thanks for your initiative. Although it
appears to be quite resource greedy. Most of the time it showed
something like:
PID USERNAMETHR PRI NICE SIZERES STATE C
On Wed, 13 Mar 2013 21:11:28 -0500, John Mehr wrote:
On Wed, 13 Mar 2013 16:29:45 +1100 (EST)
Ian Smith smi...@nimnet.asn.au wrote:
[..]
I have a small test system on which I'd installed (two instances of) 9.1 so
a couple of days ago I fetched ports with portsnap, installed svnup, and
On Sat, Mar 16, 2013 at 8:14 AM, Ian Smith smi...@nimnet.asn.au wrote:
On Wed, 13 Mar 2013 21:11:28 -0500, John Mehr wrote:
On Wed, 13 Mar 2013 16:29:45 +1100 (EST)
Ian Smith smi...@nimnet.asn.au wrote:
[..]
I have a small test system on which I'd installed (two instances of)
9.1 so
On Sun, 17 Mar 2013 02:14:30 +1100 (EST)
Ian Smith smi...@nimnet.asn.au wrote:
On Wed, 13 Mar 2013 21:11:28 -0500, John Mehr wrote:
On Wed, 13 Mar 2013 16:29:45 +1100 (EST)
Ian Smith smi...@nimnet.asn.au wrote:
svn0.us-west.freebsd.org as per example, but it's the
closest to here
anyway;
Hi,
first of all: thanx for writing svnup! I installed it from ports and
this is just way better than the situation before!
On Wed, Mar 13, 2013 at 09:11:28PM -0500, John Mehr wrote:
I always thought csup did delete files. I was looking at
csup's man page for things to put on the to-do list
On Wednesday, March 13, 2013 10:11:28 pm John Mehr wrote:
And svnup(1) really should mention that any files in the
target tree not
in the repository will be deleted, which was
(explicitly) not the case
with c{,v}sup. I only lost a few acpi patches that I
think have likely
made it
I think that this keys shouldn't be included into binary.
svnup --ports
svnup --stable
svnup --security (or --release)
I'm proposing create somewhere, like in
/usr/share/svnup/aliases
with
portsTABsvn://svn.freebsd.org/blabla/
stableTABsvn://svn.freebsd.org/blabla/
On 13 Mar 2013, at 06:29, Ian Smith smi...@nimnet.asn.au wrote:
On Tue, 12 Mar 2013 18:32:28 -0500, John Mehr wrote:
On Tue, 12 Mar 2013 02:20:37 +0100
Michael Ross g...@ross.cx wrote:
On Tue, 12 Mar 2013 00:15:35 +0100, John Mehr j...@visi.com wrote:
[..]
Hello,
I'm currently in the
On Wed, 13 Mar 2013 09:08:21 +0100, Damien Fleuriot wrote:
On 13 Mar 2013, at 06:29, Ian Smith smi...@nimnet.asn.au wrote:
Damien, please permit me to trim to the point you responded to:
As we have portsnap, which updates INDEX-* and checks integrity, I'm not
sure that using svnup for
On Tue, March 12, 2013 19:32, John Mehr wrote:
This sounds good to me, and as long as there's some sort
of a consensus that we're not breaking the principle of
least surprise, I'm all for it. The one default that may
be unexpected is the defaulting to the stable branch --
people who track
On Wed, 13 Mar 2013 16:29:45 +1100 (EST)
Ian Smith smi...@nimnet.asn.au wrote:
On Tue, 12 Mar 2013 18:32:28 -0500, John Mehr wrote:
On Tue, 12 Mar 2013 02:20:37 +0100
Michael Ross g...@ross.cx wrote:
On Tue, 12 Mar 2013 00:15:35 +0100, John Mehr
j...@visi.com wrote:
[..]
Hello,
On Tue, 12 Mar 2013 19:57:13 -0600 (MDT)
Warren Block wbl...@wonkity.com wrote:
On Tue, 12 Mar 2013, John Mehr wrote:
On Tue, 12 Mar 2013 02:20:37 +0100
Michael Ross g...@ross.cx wrote:
What'd you think about a syntax extension along the
lines of
svnup --bsd-base
svnup
On Wed, 13 Mar 2013 14:50:43 -0400
David Magda dma...@ee.ryerson.ca wrote:
On Tue, March 12, 2013 19:32, John Mehr wrote:
This sounds good to me, and as long as there's some sort
of a consensus that we're not breaking the principle of
least surprise, I'm all for it. The one default that
---
On Mar 11, 2013, at 9:20 PM, Michael Ross g...@ross.cx wrote:
On Tue, 12 Mar 2013 00:15:35 +0100, John Mehr j...@visi.com wrote:
On Mon, 11 Mar 2013 15:16:53 -0400
Patrick McEvoy patmce...@mac.com wrote:
Hello John,
This is Patrick the BSDTV guy. If you have the time /
On Tue, 12 Mar 2013 02:20:37 +0100
Michael Ross g...@ross.cx wrote:
On Tue, 12 Mar 2013 00:15:35 +0100, John Mehr
j...@visi.com wrote:
On Mon, 11 Mar 2013 15:16:53 -0400
Patrick McEvoy patmce...@mac.com wrote:
Hello John,
This is Patrick the BSDTV guy. If you have the time /
On Tue, 12 Mar 2013 09:10:41 -0400
Mark Saad nones...@longcount.org wrote:
---
On Mar 11, 2013, at 9:20 PM, Michael Ross
g...@ross.cx wrote:
On Tue, 12 Mar 2013 00:15:35 +0100, John Mehr
j...@visi.com wrote:
On Mon, 11 Mar 2013 15:16:53 -0400
Patrick McEvoy patmce...@mac.com
On Tue, 12 Mar 2013, John Mehr wrote:
On Tue, 12 Mar 2013 02:20:37 +0100
Michael Ross g...@ross.cx wrote:
What'd you think about a syntax extension along the lines of
svnup --bsd-base
svnup --bsd-ports
svnup --bsd-all
with automagic host selection, default to uname's
On Tue, 12 Mar 2013 18:32:28 -0500, John Mehr wrote:
On Tue, 12 Mar 2013 02:20:37 +0100
Michael Ross g...@ross.cx wrote:
On Tue, 12 Mar 2013 00:15:35 +0100, John Mehr j...@visi.com wrote:
[..]
Hello,
I'm currently in the process of adding http/https support to svnup and
Yes that would be great to have svnup into base as we had with cvsup then I
will be able to fetch ports/base without doing any other steps before :)
2013/3/11 Isaac (.ike) Levy i...@blackskyresearch.net
On Feb 23, 2013, at 7:36 PM, John Mehr wrote:
Hello all,
I've believe I've made
On Mar 11, 2013, at 12:53 AM, Ian Smith wrote:
On Sun, 10 Mar 2013 20:33:50 -0400, Isaac (.ike) Levy wrote:
On Feb 23, 2013, at 7:36 PM, John Mehr wrote:
Hello all,
I've believe I've made just about all of the progress optimizing svnup
as I can and I've just submitted it as a new port.
Hello John,
This is Patrick the BSDTV guy. If you have the time / inclination, would
you like to do a quick walk through svnup?**If you have a machine that
will run Skype, I could record you doing a walk through including all
the things you want to tell users about your port. Skype offers a
On Mon, 11 Mar 2013 15:16:53 -0400
Patrick McEvoy patmce...@mac.com wrote:
Hello John,
This is Patrick the BSDTV guy. If you have the time /
inclination, would you like to do a quick walk through
svnup?**If you have a machine that will run Skype, I
could record you doing a walk through
On Tue, 12 Mar 2013 00:15:35 +0100, John Mehr j...@visi.com wrote:
On Mon, 11 Mar 2013 15:16:53 -0400
Patrick McEvoy patmce...@mac.com wrote:
Hello John,
This is Patrick the BSDTV guy. If you have the time / inclination,
would you like to do a quick walk through svnup?**If you have a
On Feb 23, 2013, at 7:36 PM, John Mehr wrote:
Hello all,
I've believe I've made just about all of the progress optimizing svnup
as I can and I've just submitted it as a new port. With my ~ 350kb/s
DSL connection, it now takes just under 30 minutes to download a fresh
On Sun, 10 Mar 2013 20:33:50 -0400, Isaac (.ike) Levy wrote:
On Feb 23, 2013, at 7:36 PM, John Mehr wrote:
Hello all,
I've believe I've made just about all of the progress optimizing svnup
as I can and I've just submitted it as a new port. With my ~ 350kb/s
DSL
On Sun, 2013-02-24 at 16:04 -0800, Jeremy Chadwick wrote:
On Sun, Feb 24, 2013 at 04:43:33PM -0700, Ian Lepore wrote:
On Sun, 2013-02-24 at 13:24 -0800, Jeremy Chadwick wrote:
On Sun, Feb 24, 2013 at 10:19:57AM -0700, Ian Lepore wrote:
On Sat, 2013-02-23 at 22:31 -0800, Jeremy Chadwick
On Mon, Feb 25, 2013 at 08:54:39AM -0700, Ian Lepore wrote:
On Sun, 2013-02-24 at 16:04 -0800, Jeremy Chadwick wrote:
On Sun, Feb 24, 2013 at 04:43:33PM -0700, Ian Lepore wrote:
On Sun, 2013-02-24 at 13:24 -0800, Jeremy Chadwick wrote:
On Sun, Feb 24, 2013 at 10:19:57AM -0700, Ian Lepore
On Sat, 23 Feb 2013 22:31:10 -0800
Jeremy Chadwick j...@koitsu.org wrote:
I downloaded it and looked at the source.
svnup.c:1002: warning: zero-length printf format string
svnup.c:1020: warning: zero-length printf format string
svnup.c:1027: warning: zero-length
On Sat, 2013-02-23 at 22:31 -0800, Jeremy Chadwick wrote:
Also, John, please consider using malloc(3) instead of heap-allocated
buffers like file_buffer[6][] (196608 bytes) and command[] (32769
bytes). I'm referring to this:
Why? I absolutely do not understand why people are always
On Sun, Feb 24, 2013 at 10:19:57AM -0700, Ian Lepore wrote:
On Sat, 2013-02-23 at 22:31 -0800, Jeremy Chadwick wrote:
Also, John, please consider using malloc(3) instead of heap-allocated
buffers like file_buffer[6][] (196608 bytes) and command[] (32769
bytes). I'm referring to this:
On 02/24/2013 03:24 PM, Jeremy Chadwick wrote:
On Sun, Feb 24, 2013 at 10:19:57AM -0700, Ian Lepore wrote:
On Sat, 2013-02-23 at 22:31 -0800, Jeremy Chadwick wrote:
Also, John, please consider using malloc(3) instead of heap-allocated
buffers like file_buffer[6][] (196608 bytes) and command[]
On Sun, 2013-02-24 at 13:24 -0800, Jeremy Chadwick wrote:
On Sun, Feb 24, 2013 at 10:19:57AM -0700, Ian Lepore wrote:
On Sat, 2013-02-23 at 22:31 -0800, Jeremy Chadwick wrote:
Also, John, please consider using malloc(3) instead of heap-allocated
buffers like file_buffer[6][] (196608
On 02/24/2013 05:43 PM, Ian Lepore wrote:
On Sun, 2013-02-24 at 13:24 -0800, Jeremy Chadwick wrote:
On Sun, Feb 24, 2013 at 10:19:57AM -0700, Ian Lepore wrote:
On Sat, 2013-02-23 at 22:31 -0800, Jeremy Chadwick wrote:
Also, John, please consider using malloc(3) instead of heap-allocated
On Sun, Feb 24, 2013 at 04:43:33PM -0700, Ian Lepore wrote:
On Sun, 2013-02-24 at 13:24 -0800, Jeremy Chadwick wrote:
On Sun, Feb 24, 2013 at 10:19:57AM -0700, Ian Lepore wrote:
On Sat, 2013-02-23 at 22:31 -0800, Jeremy Chadwick wrote:
Also, John, please consider using malloc(3)
Quoth Jeremy Chadwick j...@koitsu.org:
On Sun, Feb 24, 2013 at 10:19:57AM -0700, Ian Lepore wrote:
On Sat, 2013-02-23 at 22:31 -0800, Jeremy Chadwick wrote:
Also, John, please consider using malloc(3) instead of heap-allocated
buffers like file_buffer[6][] (196608 bytes) and command[]
Ben Morrow wrote this message on Mon, Feb 25, 2013 at 00:28 +:
1. Such buffers exist during the entire program's lifetime even if they
aren't actively used/needed by the program. With malloc(3) and friends,
you're allocating memory dynamically, and you can free(3) when done with
it,
Hello all,
I've believe I've made just about all of the progress optimizing svnup
as I can and I've just submitted it as a new port. With my ~ 350kb/s
DSL connection, it now takes just under 30 minutes to download a fresh
base/releng/8.3 tree using svnup (Subversion's svn takes
On Sun, 24 Feb 2013 01:36:36 +0100, John Mehr j...@visi.com wrote:
Hello all,
I've believe I've made just about all of the progress optimizing svnup
as I can and I've just submitted it as a new port. With my ~ 350kb/s
DSL connection, it now takes just under 30 minutes to download a
On Sun, Feb 24, 2013 at 03:45:57AM +0100, Michael Ross wrote:
On Sun, 24 Feb 2013 01:36:36 +0100, John Mehr j...@visi.com wrote:
Hello all,
I've believe I've made just about all of the progress optimizing svnup
as I can and I've just submitted it as a new port. With my ~ 350kb/s
On Sun, 24 Feb 2013 04:15:09 +0100, Jeremy Chadwick j...@koitsu.org wrote:
On Sun, Feb 24, 2013 at 03:45:57AM +0100, Michael Ross wrote:
On Sun, 24 Feb 2013 01:36:36 +0100, John Mehr j...@visi.com wrote:
Hello all,
I've believe I've made just about all of the progress optimizing
svnup
On Sun, Feb 24, 2013 at 04:56:23AM +0100, Michael Ross wrote:
On Sun, 24 Feb 2013 04:15:09 +0100, Jeremy Chadwick j...@koitsu.org wrote:
On Sun, Feb 24, 2013 at 03:45:57AM +0100, Michael Ross wrote:
On Sun, 24 Feb 2013 01:36:36 +0100, John Mehr j...@visi.com wrote:
Hello all,
I've
On Sun, 24 Feb 2013 05:16:38 +0100, Jeremy Chadwick j...@koitsu.org wrote:
On Sun, Feb 24, 2013 at 04:56:23AM +0100, Michael Ross wrote:
On Sun, 24 Feb 2013 04:15:09 +0100, Jeremy Chadwick j...@koitsu.org
wrote:
On Sun, Feb 24, 2013 at 03:45:57AM +0100, Michael Ross wrote:
On Sun, 24 Feb
On Sun, Feb 24, 2013 at 05:44:10AM +0100, Michael Ross wrote:
On Sun, 24 Feb 2013 05:16:38 +0100, Jeremy Chadwick j...@koitsu.org wrote:
On Sun, Feb 24, 2013 at 04:56:23AM +0100, Michael Ross wrote:
On Sun, 24 Feb 2013 04:15:09 +0100, Jeremy Chadwick
j...@koitsu.org wrote:
On Sun, Feb 24,
On Wed, 30 Jan 2013 13:47:52 +0100
Arrigo Marchiori ard...@yahoo.it wrote:
On Tue, Jan 29, 2013 at 11:48:31AM -0500, Isaac (.ike)
I tried the attached script to download
http://svn.freebsd.org/base/stable/9/ In 27 minutes it
downloaded 67
megabytes, corresponding to 42
Hey Jonn, this news is better than my Monday AM coffee.
Once you have something working, however crudely, I'd
love to link/post/reference it on the growing wiki page-
so folks can give it a whirl.
https://wiki.freebsd.org/UsersFetchingSource
(If this project succeeds, it will neatly get rid
On Tue, Jan 29, 2013 at 11:48:31AM -0500, Isaac (.ike) Levy wrote:
[...]
John, All,
Just a quick announce re. svnup utility is really exciting/important work-
I wanted to give a shout that I re-focued my shell based c[v]sup
workalike, and I'm gunnin' for a basically functional utility
On Wed, Jan 30, 2013 at 01:47:52PM +0100, Arrigo Marchiori wrote:
[...]
The FreeBSD SVN repositories are also accessible via http. The served
pages are _very_ easy to parse, as you can see from the
attachment.
The attachment was stripped by mailman... You can download it from my
homepage:
On Wed, 30 Jan 2013 14:48:00 +0100, Arrigo Marchiori ard...@yahoo.it
wrote:
On Wed, Jan 30, 2013 at 01:47:52PM +0100, Arrigo Marchiori wrote:
[...]
The FreeBSD SVN repositories are also accessible via http. The served
pages are _very_ easy to parse, as you can see from the
attachment.
The
On Jan 27, 2013, at 10:27 PM, John Mehr wrote:
Hello,
I think I've got all of the protocol issues sorted out as good as they'll
probably get. I can't get the exact file permissions from the get-file
requests -- it only lets me know which ones are executable. Setting
executables to 0755
On CTM,
On Jan 27, 2013, at 10:54 PM, Stephen Montgomery-Smith wrote:
On 01/27/2013 09:24 PM, Isaac (.ike) Levy wrote:
On Jan 24, 2013, at 6:13 AM, Peter Jeremy wrote:
On 2013-Jan-23 15:40:50 +0100, Oliver Brandmueller o...@e-gitt.net wrote:
in ancient times there was cvsup.
Thank you for
On Jan 27, 2013, at 10:27 PM, John Mehr wrote:
On Sun, 27 Jan 2013 16:03:35 -0500
Isaac (.ike) Levy i...@blackskyresearch.net wrote:
On Jan 25, 2013, at 8:27 PM, John Mehr wrote:
On Fri, 25 Jan 2013 10:27:23 +0100
Oliver Brandmueller o...@e-gitt.net wrote:
Also I'd like to mention John
On 01/28/2013 07:34 AM, Isaac (.ike) Levy wrote:
On CTM,
On Jan 27, 2013, at 10:54 PM, Stephen Montgomery-Smith wrote:
On 01/27/2013 09:24 PM, Isaac (.ike) Levy wrote:
On Jan 24, 2013, at 6:13 AM, Peter Jeremy wrote:
On 2013-Jan-23 15:40:50 +0100, Oliver Brandmueller o...@e-gitt.net wrote:
On CTM:
On Jan 28, 2013, at 9:09 AM, Stephen Montgomery-Smith wrote:
- I'm wondering if there is a clean/reliable way to pull an index of the CTM
deltas? (This is still very far from the one-liner c[v]sup had become, it
would be great to check for new delta files in a simple automated
On 01/28/13 08:17, Isaac (.ike) Levy wrote:
On CTM:
On Jan 28, 2013, at 9:09 AM, Stephen Montgomery-Smith wrote:
- I'm wondering if there is a clean/reliable way to pull an index of the CTM
deltas? (This is still very far from the one-liner c[v]sup had become, it
would be great to check for
On CTM:
Taking the CTM questions over to ctm-users@
Best,
.ike
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-stable-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
On 2013-01-25 19:43, Chris Rees wrote:
On 25 Jan 2013 18:28, Dimitry Andric d...@freebsd.org
mailto:d...@freebsd.org wrote:
...
Thanks, but the port does not link on head, due to a problem in apr:
/usr/local/lib/libapr-1.a(apr_snprintf.o): In function `apr_vformatter':
On Jan 23, 2013, at 9:40 AM, Oliver Brandmueller wrote:
Hi,
in ancient times there was cvsup.
...
Then there came csup.
...
Times have been changing, we're now up to svn.
...
alternative small svn client
I'm trying to consolidate notes on this topic, here:
Hi Peter,
On Jan 24, 2013, at 6:13 AM, Peter Jeremy wrote:
On 2013-Jan-23 15:40:50 +0100, Oliver Brandmueller o...@e-gitt.net wrote:
in ancient times there was cvsup. cvsup was a PITA if you wanted (or
needed) to install it via ports, the only reasonable way was to use
pkg_add for that if
On 01/27/2013 09:24 PM, Isaac (.ike) Levy wrote:
Hi Peter,
On Jan 24, 2013, at 6:13 AM, Peter Jeremy wrote:
On 2013-Jan-23 15:40:50 +0100, Oliver Brandmueller o...@e-gitt.net wrote:
in ancient times there was cvsup. cvsup was a PITA if you wanted (or
needed) to install it via ports, the
On Sun, 27 Jan 2013 16:03:35 -0500
Isaac (.ike) Levy i...@blackskyresearch.net wrote:
On Jan 25, 2013, at 8:27 PM, John Mehr wrote:
On Fri, 25 Jan 2013 10:27:23 +0100
Oliver Brandmueller o...@e-gitt.net wrote:
Also I'd like to mention John Mehr, who's work on a
lightweight,
On Sun, Jan 27, 2013 at 09:27:11PM -0600, John Mehr wrote:
All I have left at this point is to add support for
command line configuration options, add comments, tidy
everything up, get it to conform to the man style
guidelines and test it against a remote repository.
If you have code
On 2013-Jan-27 21:54:44 -0600, Stephen Montgomery-Smith step...@missouri.edu
wrote:
On 01/27/2013 09:24 PM, Isaac (.ike) Levy wrote:
Thank you for adding the ctm bits in the page, I'm deeply intrigued by
possibly solving this problem with bits *already* in base?!!
Suppose you want to keep up
Hello Sergey,
Thursday, January 24, 2013, 10:09:58 PM, you wrote:
I think you don't understand the reason why people are asking for
this. I personally experienced the need not long ago. I had stable/9
branch and wanted to downgrade to 9.0. The entire process went well
until I rebooted the
Hi folks,
thank you for all the answers and fruitful discussion.
Special thanks goes to Chris Rees for coming up with the
subversion-static ports quite fast, so now we're hoping for package
building to kick in here - but that is a quick and very useful way after
setting up a fresh machine
On Thu, Jan 24, 2013 at 12:57:17AM -0800, 'Jeremy Chadwick' wrote:
[...]
Also, just as a footnote point to readers: please do not bring up
svnsup. Until it's stated by some official FreeBSD person that
{committers} are actively working on this and bringing it into the base
system so people
On 23.01.13 21:09, Peter Wemm wrote:
On Wed, Jan 23, 2013 at 9:05 AM, Isaac (.ike) Levy
i...@blackskyresearch.net wrote:
1) License. Many of SVN's dependencies will never be available in the FreeBSD
source.
While this is totally OK for development, SVN is 3rd party software, this is
On Thu, 24 Jan 2013 00:57:17 -0800, 'Jeremy Chadwick' wrote:
On Thu, Jan 24, 2013 at 06:34:33PM +1100, Dewayne wrote:
The objective is to return to a base build of FreeBSD that performs
the expected task of being able to pull source, without having to
acquire a port. Regardless of our
On Fri, Jan 25, 2013 at 10:27:23AM +0100, Oliver Brandmueller wrote:
...
an Ian Smith and des for working on a svnsup solution, which also might
in the future be something that solves the problem!
- Oliver
--
| Oliver Brandmueller http://sysadm.in/ o...@sysadm.in |
|
On Jan 25, 2013, at 2:38 PM, Ian Smith smi...@nimnet.asn.au wrote:
As others have suggested, an SVN package that could be installed with a
static build and run dependency-free binary would help ease the pain for
those looking specifically at updating 9.x or 8.x sources to -STABLE as
a
On 25/01/2013 13:38, Ian Smith wrote:
I'm trying to work out exactly when support for checking out 9-STABLE
CVS sources - and I'm only talking about system sources here - will end?
The date that CVS for src will cease to be kept in sync with SVN and
when cvsup etc. are officially withdrawn for
On 25 Jan 2013 13:39, Ian Smith smi...@nimnet.asn.au wrote:
On Thu, 24 Jan 2013 00:57:17 -0800, 'Jeremy Chadwick' wrote:
On Thu, Jan 24, 2013 at 06:34:33PM +1100, Dewayne wrote:
The objective is to return to a base build of FreeBSD that performs
the expected task of being able to
On Fri, 25 Jan 2013 15:38:33 +, Matthew Seaman wrote:
On 25/01/2013 13:38, Ian Smith wrote:
I'm trying to work out exactly when support for checking out 9-STABLE
CVS sources - and I'm only talking about system sources here - will end?
The date that CVS for src will cease to be
On 2013-01-25 16:41, Chris Rees wrote:
...
I've just created devel/subversion-static that will be available by pkg_add
once the package builds are back.
Thanks, but the port does not link on head, due to a problem in apr:
/usr/local/lib/libapr-1.a(apr_snprintf.o): In function
On 25 Jan 2013 18:28, Dimitry Andric d...@freebsd.org wrote:
On 2013-01-25 16:41, Chris Rees wrote:
...
I've just created devel/subversion-static that will be available by
pkg_add
once the package builds are back.
Thanks, but the port does not link on head, due to a problem in apr:
On Fri, Jan 25, 2013 at 03:12:03PM +0200, Daniel Kalchev wrote:
[...]
It is absurd to require the installation of any port, if your only
intention is to update the base system sources.
I think others have already pointed this out, but
if your only intention is to update the base system
On 2013-Jan-25 13:42:19 +0100, Arrigo Marchiori ard...@yahoo.it wrote:
The current svnsup design is composed of:
1- svnsup-distill: takes a revision from svn and creates a text file
(called a delta) that represents it. It seems to be almost
complete.
2- svnsup-apply: takes a delta
1 - 100 of 151 matches
Mail list logo
