The "BASE" is nothing else than a set of packages, they are not
different from any other packages (besides the fact that they have been
elected as being part of "BASE"). These packages can be removed,
installed and updated at will. That's the whole point of having packages.
For instance,
On Fri, Sep 11, 2015 at 9:40 AM, Jerome E. Shidel Jr. wrote:
>
> However, that being said. The BASE is the BASE and should not be removed
> by a package manager. It should always be there. :)
Except when you want or need to update BASE (like in upgrading from FD
1.1 to 1.2
> On Sep 11, 2015, at 10:51 AM, Mateusz Viste wrote:
>
> On 11/09/2015 16:39, Jim Hall wrote:
>> (...) then use FDNPKG or
>> UNZIP afterwards to install the other packages that you want.
>
> To avoid confusion, I will add that using UNZIP is not a one-to-one
> alternative to
> On Sep 11, 2015, at 12:58 PM, Mateusz Viste wrote:
>
> The "BASE" is nothing else than a set of packages, they are not
> different from any other packages (besides the fact that they have been
> elected as being part of "BASE"). These packages can be removed,
> installed
Will we implement an "advanced" setup?For example,after the welcome
screen,we could give the user two options:
1.Express install
2.Advanced setup
The first would be the user friendly setup,and the second would allow the
user to manually choose packages,and even access the command line (I think
it
Eric, I just get ...? LOL I guess you're not liking me again. (Just
kidding).
On Fri, Sep 11, 2015 at 10:31 AM Eric Auer wrote:
>
> Hi Jayden (and Mateusz and Jim and...) :-)
>
> > Will we implement an "advanced" setup? [...]
>
> > The first would be the user friendly
On Fri, 11 Sep 2015, Eric Auer wrote:
> Of course it is good to be able to reach a prompt,
> but I would not put effort in extra magic. To let
> the user manually select packages, the user could
> do a BASE install and afterwards simply run FDNPKG
> to install more of the packages which are
Hi Jayden (and Mateusz and Jim and...) :-)
> Will we implement an "advanced" setup? [...]
> The first would be the user friendly setup,and the second would allow the
> user to manually choose packages,and even access the command line (I think
> it has the prompt of X:\).This way,if the user
>> Will we implement an "advanced" setup? [...]
>
On Fri, Sep 11, 2015 at 9:30 AM, Eric Auer wrote:
>
> Of course it is good to be able to reach a prompt,
> but I would not put effort in extra magic. To let
> the user manually select packages, the user could
> do a BASE
On 11/09/2015 16:39, Jim Hall wrote:
> (...) then use FDNPKG or
> UNZIP afterwards to install the other packages that you want.
To avoid confusion, I will add that using UNZIP is not a one-to-one
alternative to FDNPKG. I strongly discourage using UNZIP to install
packages - such packages won't
10 matches
Mail list logo