>From what I was reading,I might have a problem (And potentially other users
as well).Back in the FD 1.1 distro,I had my install directory as
C:\SYSTEM\.When the installation finished,it would be C:\SYSTEM\BIN.If the
installation is hard coded to install at C:\FDOS,users may end up having to
EDIT
Hi Jayden,
as far as I am concerned, the installer should NOT backup
the entire drive - only the DOS directory which would get
overwritten, plus any (config, kernel) files in the root
directory that gets overwritten plus maybe the boot sector.
As far as installing and updating individual
> On Nov 12, 2015, at 7:40 AM, JAYDEN CHARBONNEAU
> wrote:
>
> From what I was reading,I might have a problem (And potentially other users
> as well).Back in the FD 1.1 distro,I had my install directory as
> C:\SYSTEM\.When the installation finished,it would be
What about the user's other data?Such as documents,extra programs,etc.?Are
we going to assume they already backed it up?
On Thu, Nov 12, 2015 at 9:13 AM, Eric Auer wrote:
>
> Hi Jayden,
>
> as far as I am concerned, the installer should NOT backup
> the entire drive - only
> On Nov 12, 2015, at 9:13 AM, Eric Auer wrote:
>
>
> Hi Jayden,
>
> as far as I am concerned, the installer should NOT backup
> the entire drive - only the DOS directory which would get
> overwritten, plus any (config, kernel) files in the root
> directory that gets
Should we add a backup utility to the UTILS package?Like Microsoft's BACKUP
command?So if the user wanted to backup everything (A command line option
could be invoked to backup packages).I am not sure if we already have
one,it has been a while since I ran a full installation on FreeDOS.
On Thu,
> On Nov 12, 2015, at 9:58 AM, JAYDEN CHARBONNEAU
> wrote:
>
> Should we add a backup utility to the UTILS package?Like Microsoft's BACKUP
> command?So if the user wanted to backup everything (A command line option
> could be invoked to backup packages).I am not
On 11/11/2015 12:00, Jerome E. Shidel Jr. wrote:
> Unzip seems to work fine for the packages on the FreeDOS 1.1 CD. (excluding
> JEMMEX, which has some
> attribute issues)
> I’m not sure what you mean by “too many details” ?
Are you able to uninstall cleanly a package that you simply unzip?
> On Nov 11, 2015, at 3:07 AM, Mateusz Viste wrote:
>
> On 10/11/2015 20:27, Jerome E. Shidel Jr. wrote:
>> FDI is done to the point that Jim requested. When the packages for
>> version 1.2 are ready, it could be deployed mostly as-is for the normal
>> basic/standard install
> On Nov 11, 2015, at 8:00 AM, Mateusz Viste wrote:
>
> On 11/11/2015 13:34, Jerome E. Shidel Jr. wrote:
>> Just FYI, %DOSDIR% will be C:\FDOS in basic/normal mode. At some point,
>> whenI get around to writing vask in V8, advanced mode will allow setting a
>> different target
On 11/11/2015 18:19, Jerome E. Shidel Jr. wrote:
> I will probably add a pre-built floppy image to my download server
> (http://up.lod.bz)
> at some point.
That would be awesome.
> If FDI uses FDINST remove, how will it be able to tell if it failed to remove
> a package because of an error or
> On Nov 11, 2015, at 12:37 PM, Mateusz Viste wrote:
>
> On 11/11/2015 18:19, Jerome E. Shidel Jr. wrote:
>> I will probably add a pre-built floppy image to my download server
>> (http://up.lod.bz)
>> at some point.
>
> That would be awesome.
>
>> If FDI uses FDINST remove,
On 11/11/2015 17:23, Jerome E. Shidel Jr. wrote:
> Converted FDI to use a single package for both binary and sources and
> to use Mateusz’s all_cd.iso as the layout for packages and to use
> FDINST instead of unzip.
Sounds cool! So if I slap your boot floppy inside all_cd.iso's, we
should end
> On Nov 11, 2015, at 11:39 AM, Mateusz Viste wrote:
>
> On 11/11/2015 17:23, Jerome E. Shidel Jr. wrote:
>> Converted FDI to use a single package for both binary and sources and
>> to use Mateusz’s all_cd.iso as the layout for packages and to use
>> FDINST instead of unzip.
>
On 11/11/2015 13:34, Jerome E. Shidel Jr. wrote:
> Just FYI, %DOSDIR% will be C:\FDOS in basic/normal mode. At some point,
> whenI get around to writing vask in V8, advanced mode will allow setting a
> different target for the install.
Having a hardcoded location is fine, I guess... Although I,
Converted FDI to use a single package for both binary and sources and to use
Mateusz’s all_cd.iso as the layout for packages and to use FDINST instead of
unzip.
base package list was easy, just added all packages in the \BASE dir.
no idea what to put in the “all” package list.
However, there
On 11/11/2015 12:52, Jerome E. Shidel Jr. wrote:
> I may be wrong, but it appears that the original FreeDOS 1.1 packages
> include “deployed” versions of the packages that include all the data to
> do what your asking.
That's not the case. Only LSM files are provided. The listing of
actually
> On Nov 11, 2015, at 6:24 AM, Mateusz Viste wrote:
>
> On 11/11/2015 12:00, Jerome E. Shidel Jr. wrote:
>> Unzip seems to work fine for the packages on the FreeDOS 1.1 CD. (excluding
>> JEMMEX, which has some
>> attribute issues)
>> I’m not sure what you mean by “too many
> On Nov 11, 2015, at 7:11 AM, Mateusz Viste wrote:
>
> On 11/11/2015 12:52, Jerome E. Shidel Jr. wrote:
>> I may be wrong, but it appears that the original FreeDOS 1.1 packages
>> include “deployed” versions of the packages that include all the data to
>> do what your asking.
On 11/11/2015 19:25, Jerome E. Shidel Jr. wrote:
> It seems kind time consuming for the FDI to run through every installed
> package with
> "FDINST remove” prior to doing an install.
What do you mean by "time consuming" ? FDINST REMOVE won't do anything
if the package is not installed - it will
> On Nov 11, 2015, at 1:50 PM, Mateusz Viste wrote:
>
> On 11/11/2015 19:25, Jerome E. Shidel Jr. wrote:
>> It seems kind time consuming for the FDI to run through every installed
>> package with
>> "FDINST remove” prior to doing an install.
>
> What do you mean by "time
On 11/11/2015 20:09, Jerome E. Shidel Jr. wrote:
>> What do you mean by "time consuming" ? FDINST REMOVE won't do anything
>> if the package is not installed - it will execute only a check
>> determining whether or not said package is already installed. This is
>> something that needs to be done
I see the problem - when you move the %DOSDIR% directory away (or backup
it), you loose all meta information about potentially installed packages.
In fact I wonder if there is a point in trying to solve such cases -
after all, if the user has some packages installed, then he doesn't need
the
> On Nov 11, 2015, at 3:28 PM, Mateusz Viste wrote:
>
> I see the problem - when you move the %DOSDIR% directory away (or backup
> it), you loose all meta information about potentially installed packages.
>
> In fact I wonder if there is a point in trying to solve such cases
OK, I put the latest version of the FDI boot floppy image up on my download
server.
http://up.lod.bz/FDI
Highly experimental still. So, I recommend only running it a virtual machine or
on
a test machine.
NOTE: At any point that it is waiting for user input, CTRL-C will bring up a
option box
Oh, one more thing on the FDI floppy image.
If you want to customize what packages are in the “ALL Packages”, just update
the A:\FDSETUP\SETUP\FDALLB.LST text file to include them.
--
26 matches
Mail list logo