I seem to remember a DOS driver called NNANSI.SYS some time ago which gave the
console ANSI escape sequences.
-
Jim Michaels
jmich...@yahoo.com
j...@jimscomputerrepairandwebdesign.com
http://JimsComputerRepairandWebDesign.com
oh, yeah, and nnansi.sys was in color. I think there was also a vt100.sys or
something around somewhere but it wasn't in color.
I will see if I can dig it up.
well, guess what - it's in freedos.
http://www.bootablecd.de/FreeDOS/help/en/hhstndrd/base/nansi.htm
you basically send it escape
Hi,
On Tue, Jul 26, 2011 at 2:30 AM, Jim Michaels jmich...@yahoo.com wrote:
I seem to remember a DOS driver called NNANSI.SYS some time ago which gave
the console ANSI escape sequences.
I presume you mean this (now GPL):
http://almy.us/dospage.html
Who gives a shit? It's included in MS-DOS 6.22, it'll be included in
FreeDOS. It's not hurting you is it? You don't suffer from erectile
disfunction because you dir and see exe2bin listed there do you? NO!
Jebus Christ, can't you find something better to bitch about? Or how about
fixing
On Tue, 26 Jul 2011, Joe Cosentino wrote:
Who gives a shit? It's included in MS-DOS 6.22, it'll be included in
FreeDOS. It's not hurting you is it? You don't suffer from erectile
disfunction because you dir and see exe2bin listed there do you? NO!
Jebus Christ, can't you find something
Steve Nickolas wrote:
For the record and for the sake of historical accuracy, I checked the
installation floppies for both upgrade and nonupgrade versions of MS-DOS
6.22, as well as full installers all the way down to 5.0 - 5.0 was the
last version to include exe2bin on the install
HAHA, Oh snap, son!
- Original Message -
From: Robert Riebisch r...@bttr-software.de
To: freedos-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
Sent: Tuesday, July 26, 2011 2:49 PM
Subject: Re: [Freedos-devel] EXE2BIN
Steve Nickolas wrote:
For the record and for the sake of historical accuracy, I
Hi,
On Tue, Jul 26, 2011 at 2:12 PM, Joe Cosentino hardmar...@comcast.net wrote:
Who gives a shit?
I don't know, that's why I'm bringing it up. Constructive criticism is
welcome (but ...).
It's included in MS-DOS 6.22, it'll be included in FreeDOS.
That's not a good metric since, as
Jebus Christ, can't you find something better to bitch about? Or how
about
fixing something while you're at it?
This might be a good time to practice what you preach.
Sorry dude, but I've done more to advance this project in 6 months (not the
last 6 months, mind you), than you have done
Op 26-7-2011 22:32, Joe Cosentino schreef:
Jebus Christ, can't you find something better to bitch about? Or how
about
fixing something while you're at it?
This might be a good time to practice what you preach.
As useless as EXE2BIN might be, we'll keep it..in BASE even. I'll admit
to never
Hi,
On Tue, Jul 26, 2011 at 3:32 PM, Joe Cosentino hardmar...@comcast.net wrote:
can't you find something better to bitch about? Or how
about fixing something while you're at it?
This might be a good time to practice what you preach.
Sorry dude, but I've done more to advance this project
Hi,
On Tue, Jul 26, 2011 at 4:07 PM, Bernd Blaauw bbla...@home.nl wrote:
Op 26-7-2011 22:32, Joe Cosentino schreef:
Or how about fixing something while you're at it?
This might be a good time to practice what you preach.
As useless as EXE2BIN might be, we'll keep it..in BASE even.
it's
Hi,
On Tue, Jul 26, 2011 at 5:26 PM, Steve Nickolas
lyricalnan...@usotsuki.hoshinet.org wrote:
On Tue, 26 Jul 2011, Rugxulo wrote:
On Tue, Jul 26, 2011 at 2:12 PM, Joe Cosentino hardmar...@comcast.net
wrote:
It's included in MS-DOS 6.22, it'll be included in FreeDOS.
That's not a good
At 04:11 PM 7/26/2011, Rugxulo wrote:
It's just hard to imagine why they would ever include LINK and EXE2BIN
when nothing comes with DOS that can use them. BASICA/GW-BASIC surely
didn't. I don't know, I'm not as savvy as some people here (Ralf?).
Well, as you asked... ;-)
EXE2BIN and LINK where
I'd like to announce a new FreeDOS 1.1 test CD-image file, see FreeDOS
website for download details.
I've squashed quite a few bugs which were mentioned in the BugTracker
that Robert Riebisch linked to. This new release should also be more
compatible with several emulation and virtualisation
On Tue, 26 Jul 2011, Ralf A. Quint wrote:
Seeing that there is so little respect for the old tools that made
out DOS, I am not sure if I should pick up one of my projects I had
started a few years back, a GW-BASIC clone, looks like there won't be
much interest for this at least in here. Or
At 08:10 PM 7/26/2011, Steve Nickolas wrote:
On Tue, 26 Jul 2011, Ralf A. Quint wrote:
Seeing that there is so little respect for the old tools that made
out DOS, I am not sure if I should pick up one of my projects I had
started a few years back, a GW-BASIC clone, looks like there won't be
Hi,
On Tue, Jul 26, 2011 at 6:36 PM, Steve Nickolas
lyricalnan...@usotsuki.hoshinet.org wrote:
Some versions of MS-DOS even included LIB (I have some specimens of 2.x and
3.x that do). DEC's releases for the Rainbow even had MASM (!).
Now that is surprising! I wonder which version (and why
On Wed, 27 Jul 2011, Rugxulo wrote:
Hi,
On Tue, Jul 26, 2011 at 6:36 PM, Steve Nickolas
lyricalnan...@usotsuki.hoshinet.org wrote:
Some versions of MS-DOS even included LIB (I have some specimens of 2.x and
3.x that do). DEC's releases for the Rainbow even had MASM (!).
Now that is
19 matches
Mail list logo
