Hi,
On Thu, May 25, 2017 at 6:59 PM, Jim Hall wrote:
> On Thu, May 25, 2017 at 8:59 AM, Ercan Ersoy wrote:
>
> I think it would be great for someone to pick up the GNUish project
> again. Port the GNU Utilities (ftp://ftp.gnu.org/gnu/) to FreeDOS
>
The links in the actual page route to simtel.net not
http://www.ibiblio.org/pub/micro/pc-stuff/freedos/gnuish/
On Fri, May 26, 2017 at 5:39 AM, Jim Hall wrote:
> Do you mean the links from my email?
>
> I just clicked on them again from my phone, and the links work except
Thanks for interesting.
I would like add abilities to Minibox. But, I don't have much time for
this. I would like someone developing.
I have cloned in GitHub.
GitHub Page:
https://github.com/ercanersoy/Minibox
Best regards,
Ercan
>> I've been writing my own set of UNIX tools for DOS for personal use.
>> Would anyone like me to publish these here in their own thread?
We have a few Unix-workalike utilities on ibiblio.
http://www.ibiblio.org/pub/micro/pc-stuff/freedos/files/util/file/
I think over the weekend I'll create a
Hi guys,
I've been writing my own set of UNIX tools for DOS for personal use.
Same here, only for Windows. :-) (Designed with portability in mind.)
Would anyone like me to publish these here in their own thread?
Yes, please.
I realized long ago that the DOS batch syntax is so poor that
I was thinking the same thing. I've been writing my own set of UNIX
tools for DOS for personal use. I've written cat, head, wc, and split,
and I've made my own implementation of getopt which uses DOS-style flags
(begin with '/', use ':' to separate flag from argument) called
getswitch. I used WCC
Do you mean the links from my email?
I just clicked on them again from my phone, and the links work except the
ftp link. My phone doesn't like ftp, I guess.
On May 26, 2017 6:31 AM, "Mark Olesen" wrote:
> I was unsuccessful in finding any links that worked. Am I missing
I was unsuccessful in finding any links that worked. Am I missing
something? Did anyone have better luck?
On Fri, May 26, 2017 at 1:35 AM, Steve Nickolas wrote:
> On Thu, 25 May 2017, Jim Hall wrote:
>
> Minibox is an interesting project, but I wonder why implement
>>
On Thu, 25 May 2017, Jim Hall wrote:
Minibox is an interesting project, but I wonder why implement
everything in one large binary, just to execute simple commands. I
know you are mimicking Busybox (above). But on a DOS system, it seems
very resource heavy to load a large exe that requires DPMI
On 5/25/2017 4:59 PM, Jim Hall wrote:
>
> Minibox is an interesting project, but I wonder why implement
> everything in one large binary, just to execute simple commands. I
> know you are mimicking Busybox (above). But on a DOS system, it seems
> very resource heavy to load a large exe that
On Thu, May 25, 2017 at 8:59 AM, Ercan Ersoy wrote:
>
> > But looking at the source commited 20 minutes ago, it seems that no commands
> > are yet implemented, it is only like a stub.
>
> Please read README. Also, Minibox includes commands in one executable file.
> (e.g.
> But looking at the source commited 20 minutes ago, it seems that no commands
> are yet implemented, it is only like a stub.
Please read README. Also, Minibox includes commands in one executable file.
(e.g. Busybox)
Command Line: minibox command [arguments]
> I am curious why it need DPMI and
?
=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
Remitente:Ercan Ersoy <ercaner...@outlook.com>
Destinatario: freedos-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
<freedos-devel@lists.sourceforge.net>
Fecha:jueves, 25 de mayo de 2017, 15:25:28
Asunto: [Freedos-devel] Linux commands in DOS - Mini
13 matches
Mail list logo