License evilness. Better to have the EDR DOS style
hack for files above 4 GB file size than that.
Than what that ??? Isn't it the same thing ???
I thought there was some discussion about exfat or whatever the
MS thing for big files on embedded devices is, as that is not FAT
in the DOS sense
License evilness. Better to have the EDR DOS style
hack for files above 4 GB file size than that.
Than what that ??? Isn't it the same thing ???
How about 64 kB?
Heh ??? DOS can read or write full 64 KiB (DX=0 ??? or is it only
64'000 Byte's ???).
I think some hacks even support 128 kB
I
Op 20-7-2011 3:50, Bart Oldeman schreef:
It's probably best to make things explicit (unless the goal is a true
Win32-DOS cross-compile), using DOS16 utilities, by changing the last
part of mkfiles\watcom.mak to:
CFLAGS1 = -os-s-wx-bt=dos
# *Implicit Rules*
.obj.exe:
On 20 July 2011 13:36, Bernd Blaauw bbla...@home.nl wrote:
And now the fun part: compiling on Windows x64. No support for running
16bit programs at all.
Sure, for that you *need* a true cross-compilation. Just like on Linux.
The FreeDOS-kernel build's utility programs (patchobj.exe) are also
On Jul 20, 2011 1:37 PM, Bernd Blaauw bbla...@home.nl wrote:
Op 20-7-2011 3:50, Bart Oldeman schreef:
It's probably best to make things explicit (unless the goal is a true
Win32-DOS cross-compile), using DOS16 utilities, by changing the last
part of mkfiles\watcom.mak to:
CFLAGS1 =
And Bart is too quick, he already adjusted the watcom.mak so it just works. :-)
Thank you,
Jeremy
--
5 Ways to Improve Secure Unified Communications
Unified Communications promises greater efficiencies for business. UC
On Sat, Jun 25, 2011 at 4:40 PM, Bernd Blaauw bbla...@home.nl wrote:
Op 25-6-2011 16:06, Kenneth J. Davis schreef:
Hello all.
...
Are there any verified/stable working compiled versions available of the
following?
* COMMAND (there's an openwatcom CVS/SVN version somewhere?)
I finally managed
On 19 July 2011 13:27, Kenneth J. Davis jere...@fdos.org wrote:
On Sat, Jun 25, 2011 at 4:40 PM, Bernd Blaauw bbla...@home.nl wrote:
Op 25-6-2011 16:06, Kenneth J. Davis schreef:
Hello all.
...
Are there any verified/stable working compiled versions available of the
following?
* COMMAND
Hi dos386,
PS: You could also compare EDRDOS+UIDE with FreeDOS+UIDE.
IIRC I tested some caches in the past. Result: NO SPEEDUP at all for a
single big file.
Maybe only helps with the sparse hack ;-)
unless dos386 describes what program(s) he used
My silly FATPLUS.EXE maybe ???
Was
Op 10-7-2011 13:11, Eric Auer schreef:
Hi dos386,
Ninja-ing thread here slightly:
Can kernel 2040 please be mirrored to Ibilio? Can't be found yet at
http://www.ibiblio.org/pub/micro/pc-stuff/freedos/files/dos/kernel/
PS: You could also compare EDRDOS+UIDE with FreeDOS+UIDE.
IIRC I tested some caches in the past. Result: NO SPEEDUP at all for a
single big file.
the data are useless :(
NOT that bad ...
unless dos386 describes what program(s) he used
My silly FATPLUS.EXE maybe ???
on what hardware to
I am working on updating my site as I move files to my new host.
www.fdos.org/kernel is updated.
Anyone can please upload the __correct__ HISTORY.TXT file for
the 2040 kernel release on some place where it is easily discoverable ?
Both SF and fdos.org ?
Op 10-7-2011 3:10, dos386 schreef:
Anyone can please upload the __correct__ HISTORY.TXT file for
the 2040 kernel release on some place where it is easily discoverable ?
Both SF and fdos.org ?
http://sourceforge.net/projects/freedos/files/Kernel/2040/
It's history.txt inside the doc
It's history.txt inside the doc directory, inside the zip archive.
No, it's outdated: 2011-04-09 ...
http://freedos.svn.sourceforge.net/viewvc/freedos/kernel/trunk/docs/history.txt?revision=1640view=markupsortby=datepathrev=1640
--
~~~ wow ~~~
More tests: http://jafile.com/uploads/dos386/perftest.txt
unless dos386 describes what program(s) he used on what hardware
to produce these results, the data are useless :(
...you can try first writing some dummy data at where the file
will end, then close it and re-open (without truncate
More tests: http://jafile.com/uploads/dos386/perftest.txt
unless dos386 describes what program(s) he used on what hardware
to produce these results, the data are useless :(
...you can try first writing some dummy data at where the file
will end, then close it and re-open (without truncate of
- write 1 byte of data at this place
Shouldn't it be sufficient to seek to the desired size (as offset), then
do a write with length zero there? (Writing with length zero extends or
truncates the file to the current seek offset.)
- close the file
- open file for writing (no truncate)
I would
Hi Christian,
- write 1 byte of data at this place
Shouldn't it be sufficient to seek to the desired size (as offset), then
do a write with length zero there? (Writing with length zero extends or
truncates the file to the current seek offset.)
Possibly, but I wanted to keep things simple
More tests: http://jafile.com/uploads/dos386/perftest.txt
--
~~~ wow ~~~
--
All of the data generated in your IT infrastructure is seriously valuable.
Why? It contains a definitive record of application performance,
Also available for download at fdos.org
http://www.fdos.org/
Content has not yet been moved to this host - please visit
http://www.fdos.info (mirror) in the meantime
http://www.fdos.info/
This page last updated - July 17, 2006
http://www.fdos.info/obten.html.en
FreeDOS Beta8 (Nikita)
I am working on updating my site as I move files to my new host.
www.fdos.org/kernel is updated. But I only have a little bit of time that I
split among development website updates.
--
All of the data generated in your
Hi!
You tested copying a 2.2 GB file...
More tests: http://jafile.com/uploads/dos386/perftest.txt
...you can try first writing some dummy data at where the file
will end, then close it and re-open (without truncate of course)
and do the actual copy. That should bundle the FAT updates and
Kernel 2040 has been tagged and should be made available on
Sourceforge file releases within next few days
It is now: http://sourceforge.net/projects/freedos/
+ it does boot (no further tests yet)
- history.txt is lowercase and not updated:
2011 Apr xx - Build 2040
Jeremy Davis,
Hello all.
Kernel 2040 has been tagged and should be made available on
Sourceforge file releases within next few days.
Also available for download at fdos.org:
installer compatible form - http://www.fdos.org/kernel/package/
same as sf releases - http://www.fdos.org/kernel/release/LATEST/
Note:
Op 25-6-2011 16:06, Kenneth J. Davis schreef:
Hello all.
Kernel 2040 has been tagged and should be made available on
Sourceforge file releases within next few days.
Nice to have an official updated kernel.
Also available for download at fdos.org:
installer compatible form -
25 matches
Mail list logo
