SOLVED?! ( was Re: BUG?! (was Re: date type attribute not added to accounting request using attr_rewrite)

2003-12-07 Thread Paul Sijben
I found now WHY a change in attr_rewrite when used in pre-Proxy does not work. It operates on request-packet rather than request-proxy. Now the question is which ought to be fixed; the call to pre-proxy in procy.c or the pre-proxy chain that uses standard calls to operate on the request? I am

Re: SOLVED?! ( was Re: BUG?! (was Re: date type attribute not added to accounting request using attr_rewrite)

2003-12-07 Thread Alan DeKok
Paul Sijben [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I found now WHY a change in attr_rewrite when used in pre-Proxy does not work. It operates on request-packet rather than request-proxy. That should be fixed. Now the question is which ought to be fixed; the call to pre-proxy in procy.c Absolutely

Re: SOLVED?! ( was Re: BUG?! (was Re: date type attribute not added to accounting request using attr_rewrite)

2003-12-07 Thread Kostas Kalevras
On Sun, 7 Dec 2003, Alan DeKok wrote: Paul Sijben [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I found now WHY a change in attr_rewrite when used in pre-Proxy does not work. It operates on request-packet rather than request-proxy. That should be fixed. Now the question is which ought to be fixed; the

Re: SOLVED?! ( was Re: BUG?! (was Re: date type attribute not added to accounting request using attr_rewrite)

2003-12-07 Thread Paul Sijben
Alan DeKok wrote: Paul Sijben [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I found now WHY a change in attr_rewrite when used in pre-Proxy does not work. It operates on request-packet rather than request-proxy. That should be fixed. Now the question is which ought to be fixed; the call to pre-proxy in

Re: SOLVED?! ( was Re: BUG?! (was Re: date type attribute not added to accounting request using attr_rewrite)

2003-12-07 Thread Paul Sijben
Ah, I see what you mean. Ok that will work as well ;-) Paul Kostas Kalevras wrote: On Sun, 7 Dec 2003, Alan DeKok wrote: Paul Sijben [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I found now WHY a change in attr_rewrite when used in pre-Proxy does not work. It operates on request-packet rather than