RE: Bug in CUI generation? Is this a known issue?

2013-05-14 Thread stefan.paetow
list Subject: Re: Bug in CUI generation? Is this a known issue? Matthew Newton wrote: Bug. src/main/xlat.c:1077 has: if (isdigit(l[1])) break; which stops looking for a module_name (e.g. md5 if the first character after the : is a digit. Yeah... that's hard to fix in 2.x. The code

Re: Bug in CUI generation? Is this a known issue?

2013-05-13 Thread Alan DeKok
Matthew Newton wrote: Bug. src/main/xlat.c:1077 has: if (isdigit(l[1])) break; which stops looking for a module_name (e.g. md5 if the first character after the : is a digit. Yeah... that's hard to fix in 2.x. The code is rich in material plants like. (If you get my drift) Fixed

Bug in CUI generation? Is this a known issue?

2013-05-10 Thread stefan.paetow
I'm playing around with CUI generation with FreeRADIUS 2.2.0 and discovered something odd. In policy.conf I've set cui_require_operator_name = 1 and cui_hash_key = 4c2982f2f3b1dc4804994cf386db8c0a34d4ab2a. As you can see it's a 32-character string and it looks like a hash. In radiusd -X

Re: Bug in CUI generation? Is this a known issue?

2013-05-10 Thread A . L . M . Buxey
Hi, rad_recv: Access-Request packet from host 192.168.126.155 port 1814, id=17, length=113 User-Name = st...@diamond.ac.uk User-Password = testing NAS-IP-Address = 127.0.0.1 NAS-Port = 0

RE: Bug in CUI generation? Is this a known issue?

2013-05-10 Thread stefan.paetow
] On Behalf Of a.l.m.bu...@lboro.ac.uk Sent: 10 May 2013 11:00 To: FreeRadius users mailing list Subject: Re: Bug in CUI generation? Is this a known issue? Hi, rad_recv: Access-Request packet from host 192.168.126.155 port 1814, id=17, length=113 User-Name = st

Re: Bug in CUI generation? Is this a known issue?

2013-05-10 Thread Matthew Newton
Hi, On Fri, May 10, 2013 at 09:49:14AM +, stefan.pae...@diamond.ac.uk wrote: As you can see, the expand: bit shows an empty value. Then I changed my cui_hash_key to 01234567890abcdef01234567890abcdef and it did the same. However, when I set cui_hash_key to a hex string that was not 32

Re: Bug in CUI generation? Is this a known issue?

2013-05-10 Thread Phil Mayers
On 10/05/13 12:12, Matthew Newton wrote: Hi, On Fri, May 10, 2013 at 09:49:14AM +, stefan.pae...@diamond.ac.uk wrote: As you can see, the expand: bit shows an empty value. Then I changed my cui_hash_key to 01234567890abcdef01234567890abcdef and it did the same. However, when I set

RE: Bug in CUI generation? Is this a known issue?

2013-05-10 Thread stefan.paetow
mailing list Subject: Re: Bug in CUI generation? Is this a known issue? Hi, On Fri, May 10, 2013 at 09:49:14AM +, stefan.pae...@diamond.ac.uk wrote: As you can see, the expand: bit shows an empty value. Then I changed my cui_hash_key to 01234567890abcdef01234567890abcdef and it did