Re: Managing Data Volume Control More Than 4GB FR CoovaChilli

2013-10-09 Thread Russell Mike
Dear Aran C. Bell Thanks for everything, Here is update. 1.) All-In-MB counter works. Please note, when a user has downloaded his quota, counter do not force log off . Saying other way, if the user is online, he would remain online until he log off him self or stop browsing. But point to be

Re: Managing Data Volume Control More Than 4GB FR CoovaChilli

2013-10-09 Thread Alan DeKok
Russell Mike wrote: All-In-MB counter works. Please note, when a user has downloaded his quota, counter do not force log off . The counter modules DOES NOT DO THAT. To see why, ask yourself what does FreeRADIUS see when the user has downloaded his quota? The answer is nothing. The

Re: Managing Data Volume Control More Than 4GB FR CoovaChilli

2013-10-09 Thread Russell Mike
Thanks Alan. D So if you want to do something when the users traffic is over the quota, you have to do it in the accounting section. Could you please kindly indicate what should i do there ? i tried to perform the check again when user is online by adding counter entry in * session* section. but

Re: Managing Data Volume Control More Than 4GB FR CoovaChilli

2013-10-09 Thread Alan DeKok
Russell Mike wrote: So if you want to do something when the users traffic is over the quota, you have to do it in the accounting section. Could you please kindly indicate what should i do there ? i tried to perform the check again when user is online by adding counter entry in *session*

Re: Managing Data Volume Control More Than 4GB FR CoovaChilli

2013-10-09 Thread Russell Mike
Thanks Alan D understood. I will use unlang in accounting. Thanks On Wednesday, October 9, 2013, Alan DeKok wrote: Russell Mike wrote: So if you want to do something when the users traffic is over the quota, you have to do it in the accounting section. Could you please kindly indicate

Managing Data Volume Control More Than 4GB FR CoovaChilli

2013-10-08 Thread Russell Mike
Hi List Members i have been reading archives and tying to understand for some days now, but unsuccessful. i am currently working to extend data volume control up to 10GB, which is requirement for the organization. Is anyone able to manage more then 4GB using CoovaChilli Freeradius? Since

Re: Managing Data Volume Control More Than 4GB FR CoovaChilli

2013-10-08 Thread Arran Cudbard-Bell
On 8 Oct 2013, at 10:10, Russell Mike radius@gmail.com wrote: Hi List Members i have been reading archives and tying to understand for some days now, but unsuccessful. i am currently working to extend data volume control up to 10GB, which is requirement for the organization

Re: Managing Data Volume Control More Than 4GB FR CoovaChilli

2013-10-08 Thread Arran Cudbard-Bell
It might actually be an idea to add those to the internal dictionary to make it a bit easier. Just to clarify there are two reasons why your current config isn't working: 1. rlm_sql stores the value as a proper 64bit integer, not in the two 32bit chunks represented by Acct-Input-Gigawords

Re: Managing Data Volume Control More Than 4GB FR CoovaChilli

2013-10-08 Thread Russell Mike
Dear Arran C. Bell, Thank you very much, i am extremely grateful for your advise and guidelines for troubleshoot also. i am currently experimenting a different rlm_sqlcounter using CoovaChilli dictionary All-In-MB. In result, i can store short number in db. This counter would reset at 2TB with

Re: Managing Data Volume Control More Than 4GB FR CoovaChilli

2013-10-08 Thread Arran Cudbard-Bell
On 8 Oct 2013, at 15:40, Russell Mike radius@gmail.com wrote: Dear Arran C. Bell, Thank you very much, i am extremely grateful for your advise and guidelines for troubleshoot also. i am currently experimenting a different rlm_sqlcounter using CoovaChilli dictionary All-In-MB. In

Re: Volume Control

2013-04-17 Thread Russell Mike
Hi Aran, thanks for clarification through your response If I understand your answer is that you are saying is that currently as is freeRadius is using 64bits data types in some areas and not in others, am I Right?. Also is it possible to allow free radius to validate traffic above 4GB? Thanks /

Re: Volume Control

2013-04-17 Thread Arran Cudbard-Bell
On 17 Apr 2013, at 05:27, Russell Mike radius@gmail.com wrote: Hi Aran, thanks for clarification through your response If I understand your answer is that you are saying is that currently as is freeRadius is using 64bits data types in some areas and not in others, am I Right?. Also is

Re: Volume Control

2013-04-17 Thread Russell Mike
Dear Arrran, Thanks you very(32) much. Thats what i wanted to know if it is not FR limitation. Regards / RM -- On Wed, Apr 17, 2013 at 2:13 PM, Arran Cudbard-Bell a.cudba...@freeradius.org wrote: On 17 Apr 2013, at 05:27, Russell Mike radius@gmail.com wrote: Hi Aran, thanks for

Re: Volume Control

2013-04-17 Thread Alan DeKok
Russell Mike wrote: Thanks you very(32) much. Thats what i wanted to know if it is not FR limitation. It is a limitation of the RADIUS protocol. Integers are 32-bits. Alan DeKok. - List info/subscribe/unsubscribe? See http://www.freeradius.org/list/users.html

Volume Control

2013-04-16 Thread Russell Mike
Dear Alan D. What Freeraidus is using currently as to keep track. Is it 64bit or 32bit. Thanks / Regards - List info/subscribe/unsubscribe? See http://www.freeradius.org/list/users.html

Re: Volume Control

2013-04-16 Thread Arran Cudbard-Bell
What Freeraidus is using currently as to keep track. Is it 64bit or 32bit. FreeRADIUS makes liberal use of 64bit data types. -Arran Arran Cudbard-Bell a.cudba...@freeradius.org FreeRADIUS Development Team - List info/subscribe/unsubscribe? See http://www.freeradius.org/list/users.html

Re: Volume Control

2013-04-16 Thread Alan DeKok
Russell Mike wrote: Dear Alan D. I may create a new rule. People who address mail to me personally get unsubscribed. Alan DeKok. - List info/subscribe/unsubscribe? See http://www.freeradius.org/list/users.html

Re: RFC3576 traffic volume control

2004-12-03 Thread Josh Howlett
David Luyens wrote: Hi, Are there any plans to support RFC3576, more particularly the disconnect message? I would like to see it implemented for traffic volume control. Please don not tell me to write the code myself as I am not a programmer The other alternative is to sponsor a FreeRADIUS

RE: RFC3576 traffic volume control

2004-12-03 Thread David Luyens
control David Luyens wrote: Hi, Are there any plans to support RFC3576, more particularly the disconnect message? I would like to see it implemented for traffic volume control. Please don not tell me to write the code myself as I am not a programmer The other alternative