Dear Dr Fischl:
I have seen in the paper High-Resolution Intersubject Averaging and
a Coordinate System for the
Cortical Surface, in fig1, fig2, the subject image registered with the
average folding pattern is much thick
in both the sulci and the gyri, while the result in the bert
It sounds like the topology fixing was never run, or failed. Can you try
trunning it again and see what the output is?
Bruce
On Thu, 18 Dec 2003, SHIJIE TANG wrote:
Hi, Professor Fischl, Thank you for your reply,
there are 114090 vertex and 228348 triangles, so EC=-84
-
I'm not sure what you mean thin and thick. The figures I think show
the ?h.sulc overlay, not the ?h.curv ones (depth instead of curvature).
Bruce
On
Fri, 19 Dec 2003, Zhang zhijun wrote:
Dear Dr Fischl:
I have seen in the paper High-Resolution Intersubject Averaging and
a
I just mean that the image in your paper is more wide than the image in
bert tutorial.
May I ask how to show ?h.sulc overlay instead of ?h.curv ?
also, how to overlay the average folding pattern together with the subject
folding pattern?
in your paper the average pattern is shown in black line
in tksurfer you can use the file menu to load a different curvature file
such as ?h.sulc.
Bruce
On Fri, 19 Dec 2003, Zhang zhijun wrote:
I just mean that the image in your paper is more wide than the image in
bert tutorial.
May I ask how to show ?h.sulc overlay instead of ?h.curv ?
Hi Graham, thanks for the tip. I will try 3dTagalign
Joe
- Original Message -
From: Graham Wideman [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Thursday, December 18, 2003 1:36 pm
Subject: Re: Registration of MRI's Acquired on Different Days?
html
Joe:
There are various reasons why 3dvolreg
it's not a byproduct, but it does use the spherical registration to build
a classifier array.
Bruce
On Fri, 19 Dec 2003, Zhang zhijun wrote:
Then the labelling is a by product of the spherical registration?
If I have the sulci labeling obtained by using other method, such as using
the
