[Freesurfer] Smoothing and ROI averages from .stats output

External Email - Use Caution Good afternoon, It is my understanding that if I am only interested in the already averaged region ROIs that are output in the .stats files that I should not use a smoothing kernel as they are already averaged across all vertices, correct? My

Re: [Freesurfer] Updating submillimeter data from 5.3 to 7.1 with -hires?

sh by running it in v7.1 with -hires? On 7/8/2020 10:46 AM, Daniel Westfall wrote: > > External Email - Use Caution > > Hi Everyone, > > I have access to two large datasets (~600 scans) that were previously > collected, processed, QC'd, and manually edited where necess

[Freesurfer] Updating submillimeter data from 5.3 to 7.1 with -hires?

External Email - Use Caution Hi Everyone, I have access to two large datasets (~600 scans) that were previously collected, processed, QC'd, and manually edited where necessary in Freesurfer 5.3 with recon-all. However, the data is 0.9 mm isotropic collected in a 3T scanner. I

[Freesurfer] Freesurfer 6 current state of submillimeter processing

External Email - Use Caution Hi Everyone, I just wanted to double check the current state of processing T3 submillimeter data with Freesurfer 6. We have two studies: one with 0.9 mm isotropic and the other with 0.8 mm isotropic. After doing some investigating, I found that there