Hi Darren,
the ico and average7 are about the same computationally. However, it is
more convenient to use average7 it has a surface that you can directly
render the results on. With ico, you'd still have to run mri_surf2surf
to convert it to another surface.
I'm not sure what you're trying to
Hi Brian,
I just finished that program a few weeks ago. This program allows you to
do cross-subject/cross-group analysis of surface data by solving a GLM
with ordinary least-squares (OLS). It also allows you to pre-smooth the
surface values as well as include covariates (eg, age, gender, etc).
in the help file). It said
something like it had no surface to paint to (I don't have the exact message
because I am not in linux right now). So, I haven't seen the painted on
results yet.
thanks,
brian
- Original Message -
From: Doug Greve [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent
), use the fmri_svbfile function in the toolbox
to save a volume in bfloat format.
doug
Bradley Goodyear wrote:
Thanks Doug.
Those links don't seem to work. In any case, I am running Freesurfer on
an SGI.
-BRad
On Wednesday, July 31, 2002, at 11:35 AM, Doug Greve wrote:
Ah, I
/
maybe try the first first to make sure that's the problem. Copy
mri_convert.linux into freesurfer_alpha/bin/Linux
doug
Bradley Goodyear wrote:
unknown flag --in_nspmzeropad
-Brad
On Tuesday, July 30, 2002, at 03:51 PM, Doug Greve wrote:
Try the following command-line
Use mri_convert. Here's an example for an spm functional volume
spm001.img, spm002.img ...
mri_convert spm001.img --in_type spm spm_000.bfloat
This should create the spm bfloat volume.
doug
Bradley Goodyear wrote:
Which parameter from the .HDR file does spm_to_b use as the number of
Hi Nick,
what does the -tty do? Is that new to version 6? Will it work for
version 5?
doug
Nicholas Knouf wrote:
Hi there,
I've got a question, this time about FS-FAST (if this isn't the
appropriate place to ask these questions, feel free to let me know).
I'm running the latest
It looks like mri_convert cannot find information about the orientation
of the volume. The analyze format does not have fields in the header for
this information, but SPM usually adds a .mat file. It does not look
like fs_sub.img has a fs_sub.mat, so mri_convert is guessing
(incorrectly) what
their natural location is between slices.
Bruce
On Thu, 14 Mar 2002, Doug Greve
wrote:
Hi Blaise,
the problem may be that the vertex is between slices. When you use the
goto vertex option in tkmedit, the cursor will go to the closest point
to that vertex. If the vertex is between
Hi All,
thanks to Al's diligence, I have tracked down a bug in the most recent
version of mri_convert, the one that I mentioned a few weeks ago that
could be downloaded from
ftp://surfer.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/transfer/outgoing/flat/FreeSurfer.
There was a problem with the way it was reading the
10 matches
Mail list logo