So the good news is that with the 2.1.9-style sigma,
FT 2.1.10pre is much better than FT 2.1.9 for FT_Glyph_Stroke(),
and no worse than FT 2.1.9 for FT_Glyph_StrokeBorder().
David wrote me that his sigma change tried to fix a peculiar case --
he no longer has the original data, unfortunately.
Werner LEMBERG wrote:
Unfortunately I am seeing various regressions in stroking (which in
2.1.9 wasn't perfect, but was better). I attach some pictures
comparing 2.1.9 and 2.1.10. This is FT_STROKER_LINECAP_BUTT /
FT_STROKER_LINEJOIN_ROUND and VeraMono.ttf. I can provide more
detail if
