So the good news is that with the 2.1.9-style sigma,
FT 2.1.10pre is much better than FT 2.1.9 for FT_Glyph_Stroke(),
and no worse than FT 2.1.9 for FT_Glyph_StrokeBorder().
David wrote me that his sigma change tried to fix a peculiar case --
he no longer has the original data, unfortunately.
Werner LEMBERG wrote:
Unfortunately I am seeing various regressions in stroking (which in
2.1.9 wasn't perfect, but was better). I attach some pictures
comparing 2.1.9 and 2.1.10. This is FT_STROKER_LINECAP_BUTT /
FT_STROKER_LINEJOIN_ROUND and VeraMono.ttf. I can provide more
detail if
Folks,
I've uploaded a first pretest version of 2.1.10! This is mainly to
test whether the library compiles on various platforms, and to check
whether the library itself works correctly. There are still some
rough edges with documentation files...
You can download it from
