http://cci.esa.int/data/#dash
--
☣ uǝlƃ
.-. .- -. -.. --- -- -..-. -.. --- - ... -..-. .- -. -.. -..-. -.. .- ...
. ...
FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv
Zoom Fridays 9:30a-12p Mtn GMT-6 bit.ly/virtualfriam
unsubscribe http://redfish.com/mailman/listinfo/friam_redfish.com
of Ethology and Psychology
>
> Clark University
>
> thompnicks...@gmail.com
>
> https://wordpress.clarku.edu/nthompson/
>
>
>
>
>
> *From:* Friam *On Behalf Of *Merle Lefkoff
> *Sent:* Thursday, January 2, 2020 1:48 PM
> *To:* The Friday Morning Appli
imberly
>>
>> My memoir:
>> https://www.amazon.com/author/frankwimberly
>>
>> My scientific publications:
>> https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Frank_Wimberly2
>>
>> Phone (505) 670-9918
>>
>> On Thu, Jan 2, 2020, 10:51 AM wro
;
>>
>> I think he is going to say that the migration IS the treatment.
>>
>>
>>
>> Nick
>>
>>
>>
>> Nicholas Thompson
>>
>> Emeritus Professor of Ethology and Psychology
>>
>> Clark University
>>
>> th
cks...@gmail.com> thompnicks...@gmail.com
<https://wordpress.clarku.edu/nthompson/>
https://wordpress.clarku.edu/nthompson/
From: Friam On Behalf Of Merle Lefkoff
Sent: Thursday, January 2, 2020 1:48 PM
To: The Friday Morning Applied Complexity Coffee Group
Subject: Re: [FRIAM] cl
erhaps "existing political boundaries" are no longer a viable or
> rational concept? >
>
>
>
> Side effects is a good way to look at it. No drug that works doesn't have
> side effects. Just have to ride them out and let the treatment do its
> thing.
hompson/
>
>
>
>
>
> *From:* Friam *On Behalf Of *Marcus Daniels
> *Sent:* Thursday, January 2, 2020 10:46 AM
> *To:* Tom Johnson ; The Friday Morning Applied
> Complexity Coffee Group
> *Subject:* Re: [FRIAM] climate change questions
>
>
>
> Dave writes:
I really appreciate lists like this. I'd add a few of my own: only fly on
business and only when necessary, work remotely as much as possible,
consolidate online orders to reduce the number of deliveries, tap water, etc. I
fail often, though, e.g. taking 2 extra bodies with me on my last
Marcus
From: Friam on behalf of Merle Lefkoff
Sent: Thursday, January 2, 2020 10:48 AM
To: The Friday Morning Applied Complexity Coffee Group
Subject: Re: [FRIAM] climate change questions
And what treatment do you suggest, Marcus?
On Thu, Jan 2, 2020 at 9:46 AM
> https://wordpress.clarku.edu/nthompson/
>
>
>
>
>
> *From:* Friam *On Behalf Of *Marcus Daniels
> *Sent:* Thursday, January 2, 2020 10:46 AM
> *To:* Tom Johnson ; The Friday Morning Applied
> Complexity Coffee Group
> *Subject:* Re: [FRIAM] climate change
n/>
https://wordpress.clarku.edu/nthompson/
From: Friam On Behalf Of Marcus Daniels
Sent: Thursday, January 2, 2020 10:46 AM
To: Tom Johnson ; The Friday Morning Applied Complexity
Coffee Group
Subject: Re: [FRIAM] climate change questions
Dave writes:
< Even more scary are all the side eff
st have to ride them out and let the treatment do
> its thing.
>
> Marcus
> --
> *From:* Friam on behalf of Tom Johnson <
> t...@jtjohnson.com>
> *Sent:* Thursday, January 2, 2020 1:20 AM
> *To:* The Friday Morning Applied Complexity Coffee
anuary 2, 2020 1:20 AM
To: The Friday Morning Applied Complexity Coffee Group
Subject: Re: [FRIAM] climate change questions
RE Dave West: So perhaps "existing political boundaries" are no longer a viable
or rational concept? (But I have yet to find a potential alternative.)
Tom Johns
2020 2:39 AM
To: friam@redfish.com
Subject: Re: [FRIAM] climate change questions
Merle wrote:
" ... the deep dialogue on global warming that I experience (and sometimes
facilitate) happening around the world everywhere but here in the U.S ..."
Echo that
-- I am now
Merle wrote:
*" ... the deep dialogue on global warming that I experience (and sometimes
facilitate) happening around the world everywhere but here in the U.S ..."*
Echo that
-- I am now experiencing two kinds of deep personal shame at the moment. One
because everybody but me knows and
y, January 1, 2020 12:30 PM
> To: friam@redfish.com
> Subject: Re: [FRIAM] climate change questions
>
> Nick,
>
> I am not overwhelmingly concerned with steady climate change per se; it is
> the variability that is the real concern, as you point out. Even more scary
> are a
Sent: Wednesday, January 1, 2020 12:30 PM
To: friam@redfish.com
Subject: Re: [FRIAM] climate change questions
Nick,
I am not overwhelmingly concerned with steady climate change per se; it is
the variability that is the real concern, as you point out. Even more scary
are all the side effects
Steven Smith and Stephen Guerin were two of the complex systems scientists
our organization (The Center for Emergent Diplomacy) invited to join a
conference we organized in Stockholm a few weeks ago--combining our guys
with our Swedish network of scientists and policy wonks working seriously
on
s...@gmail.com
>
> https://wordpress.clarku.edu/nthompson/
>
>
>
>
>
>
> *From:* Friam *On Behalf Of *Prof David West
> *Sent:* Wednesday, January 1, 2020 12:19 PM
> *To:* friam@redfish.com
> *Subject:* Re: [FRIAM] climate change questions
>
>
>
> convi
Dave writes:
< I don't see the point in supporting politicians like Ocasio-Cortez or even
Warren and trying to convince people to give up their cars or quit eating meat
in order to reduce the amount of carbon being put into the atmosphere, simply
because I have zero belief that it will happen.
On Wed, Jan 1, 2020 at 12:16 PM Douglass Carmichael
wrote:
> We are stuck at the point where, to stay under 1.5 or 2, it is clear that
> we must cut fossil fuel extraction and use and there is no existing
> politics todo it because it mans loss of jobs, failures of mortgages,
> collapse of
..@gmail.com
>
> https://wordpress.clarku.edu/nthompson/
>
>
>
>
>
>
> *From:* Friam *On Behalf Of *Prof David West
> *Sent:* Wednesday, January 1, 2020 12:19 PM
> *To:* friam@redfish.com
> *Subject:* Re: [FRIAM] climate change questions
>
>
>
sychology
> Clark University
> thompnicks...@gmail.com
> https://wordpress.clarku.edu/nthompson/
>
>
>
> *From:* Friam *On Behalf Of *Prof David West
> *Sent:* Wednesday, January 1, 2020 12:19 PM
> *To:* friam@redfish.com
> *Subject:* Re: [FRIAM]
Hi:
Mostly I monitor the group, but today since I'm very much involved in
solving the warming issue, I'll offer my argument. First, let's avoid the
estimates and look at what is happening. Most agree that storms,
earthquakes, fires, and other natural disasters are increasing. Let's just
focus
Per Prof West's comments --
In some cases you state degrees F and in others the scale is unspecified.
It is good to keep the scale consistent. The IPCC uses degrees C.
For a good overview of the IPCC (including brief summaries of models) see
the wikipedia page. Since the IPCC is a large group
l.com
Sent: Wednesday, January 1, 2020 12:59 PM
To: 'The Friday Morning Applied Complexity Coffee Group'
Subject: Re: [FRIAM] climate change questions
Marcus,
I haven’t known a Marxist for many years, but I think this corresponds to a
dictum of Marxist thought: Stop Feeding the Dinosaur!
That ma
ary 1, 2020 12:37 PM
> *To:* The Friday Morning Applied Complexity Coffee Group
> mailto:friam@redfish.com>>
> *Subject:* Re: [FRIAM] climate change questions
>
>
> Let’s say we are able to bring the price of solar generated
> electricity below that of electricit
From: Friam On Behalf Of Marcus Daniels
Sent: Wednesday, January 1, 2020 12:45 PM
To: doug carmichael ; The Friday Morning Applied
Complexity Coffee Group
Subject: Re: [FRIAM] climate change questions
It seems to me the solution is to do nothing. The world has to become
rela
can heal.
> --
> *From:* Friam on behalf of doug carmichael <
> d...@dougcarmichael.com>
> *Sent:* Wednesday, January 1, 2020 12:37 PM
> *To:* The Friday Morning Applied Complexity Coffee Group <
> friam@redfish.com>
> *Subject:* Re: [FRIAM] climate change ques
: Wednesday, January 1, 2020 12:37 PM
To: The Friday Morning Applied Complexity Coffee Group
Subject: Re: [FRIAM] climate change questions
Let’s say we are able to bring the price of solar generated electricity below
that of electricity generated by fossil fuels. This leaves several important
/>
https://wordpress.clarku.edu/nthompson/
From: Friam On Behalf Of Prof David West
Sent: Wednesday, January 1, 2020 12:19 PM
To: friam@redfish.com
Subject: Re: [FRIAM] climate change questions
convict of what?
premeditated Gaia murder?
voluntary climate slaughter?
involuntary clima
jury.
>>>
>>> Nick
>>>
>>> Nicholas Thompson
>>> Emeritus Professor of Ethology and Psychology
>>> Clark University
>>> thompnicks...@gmail.com
>>> https://wordpress.clarku.ed
> Nicholas Thompson
> Emeritus Professor of Ethology and Psychology
> Clark University
> thompnicks...@gmail.com
> https://wordpress.clarku.edu/nthompson/
>
>
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Friam On Behalf Of Prof David West
> Sent: Wednesday, January 1,
t;
>> Nick
>>
>> Nicholas Thompson
>> Emeritus Professor of Ethology and Psychology
>> Clark University
>> thompnicks...@gmail.com
>> https://wordpress.clarku.edu/nthompson/
>>
>>
>>
>> *From:* Friam *On Behalf Of *F
d Complexity Coffee Group
Subject: Re: [FRIAM] climate change questions
We are stuck at the point where, to stay under 1.5 or 2, it is clear that we
must cut fossil fuel extraction and use and there is no existing politics todo
it because it mans loss of jobs, failures of mortgages, colla
logy and Psychology
> Clark University
> thompnicks...@gmail.com
> https://wordpress.clarku.edu/nthompson/
>
>
>
> *From:* Friam *On Behalf Of *Frank Wimberly
> *Sent:* Wednesday, January 1, 2020 11:27 AM
> *To:* The Friday Morning Applied Complexi
nthompson/>
>
>
> From: Friam mailto:friam-boun...@redfish.com>> On
> Behalf Of Frank Wimberly
> Sent: Wednesday, January 1, 2020 11:27 AM
> To: The Friday Morning Applied Complexity Coffee Group <mailto:friam@redfish.com>>
> Subject: Re: [FRIAM] climate
as Thompson
>
> Emeritus Professor of Ethology and Psychology
>
> Clark University
>
> thompnicks...@gmail.com
>
> https://wordpress.clarku.edu/nthompson/
>
>
>
>
>
> *From:* Friam *On Behalf Of *Frank Wimberly
> *Sent:* Wednesday, January 1, 202
il.com
<https://wordpress.clarku.edu/nthompson/>
https://wordpress.clarku.edu/nthompson/
From: Friam On Behalf Of Frank Wimberly
Sent: Wednesday, January 1, 2020 11:27 AM
To: The Friday Morning Applied Complexity Coffee Group
Subject: Re: [FRIAM] climate change questions
>Fr
o do it,
>> and some way to keep our correspondence is order so that it's value could
>> be
>> harvested for the long run.
>>
>> Happy New Year!
>>
>> Nick
>>
>> Nicholas Thompson
>> Emeritus Professor of Ethology and Psychology
>> Cla
gt; Nick
>
> Nicholas Thompson
> Emeritus Professor of Ethology and Psychology
> Clark University
> thompnicks...@gmail.com
> https://wordpress.clarku.edu/nthompson/
>
>
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Friam On Behalf Of Prof David West
> Sent: Wednes
://wordpress.clarku.edu/nthompson/
-Original Message-
From: Friam On Behalf Of Prof David West
Sent: Wednesday, January 1, 2020 9:45 AM
To: friam@redfish.com
Subject: [FRIAM] climate change questions
Questions, that do NOT, in any manner or form deny the reality of climate
change
Questions, that do NOT, in any manner or form deny the reality of climate
change.
In 1990, citing the "best scientific models available" stated that because of
carbon dioxide emissions, the Earth would warm by an average of 3 degrees
Fahrenheit and the U.S. as the largest producer, by an
of Psychology and Biology
>
> Clark University
>
> http://home.earthlink.net/~nickthompson/naturaldesigns/
>
>
>
> *From:* Friam [mailto:friam-boun...@redfish.com] *On Behalf Of *Pieter
> Steenekamp
> *Sent:* Sunday, December 31, 2017 12:39 AM
>
> *To:* The Friday Morni
Although the sophist- ... icated tangent into groupthink and goodness of
thought might be interesting, it's politically bankrupt, as is any sort of
philosophical skepticism.
The problem is what to *do*, if anything. I think Carl's post targets this
most directly. It seems to me our policy
raldesigns/
>
> *From:* Friam [mailto:friam-boun...@redfish.com] *On Behalf Of *Prof
> David West *Sent:* Saturday, December 30, 2017 8:36 PM *To:*
> friam@redfish.com *Subject:* Re: [FRIAM] Climate Change>
> In my most humble opinion:
>
> 1) it evolves in r
ber 31, 2017 12:39 AM
To: The Friday Morning Applied Complexity Coffee Group <friam@redfish.com>
Subject: Re: [FRIAM] Climate Change
Nick,
Referring to your What are the properties of good GroupThought: i.e., Group
Thought that is likely to survive experience into the deep future?
m: Friam <friam-boun...@redfish.com> on behalf of Pieter Steenekamp
<piet...@randcontrols.co.za>
Sent: Sunday, December 31, 2017 12:39:29 AM
To: The Friday Morning Applied Complexity Coffee Group
Subject: Re: [FRIAM] Climate Change
Nick,
Referring to your What are the properties of
y, December 30, 2017 8:35 PM
To: friam@redfish.com
Subject: Re: [FRIAM] Climate Change
In my most humble opinion:
1) it evolves in real-time, not only when new data is received but when new
perspectives are offered. No more of this waiting for the old generation to die
before we can change our minds cr
fish.com] *On Behalf Of *Prof
> David West *Sent:* Saturday, December 30, 2017 8:36 PM *To:*
> friam@redfish.com *Subject:* Re: [FRIAM] Climate Change>
> In my most humble opinion:
>
> 1) it evolves in real-time, not only when new data is received but
>when new per
>
> Emeritus Professor of Psychology and Biology
>
> Clark University
>
> http://home.earthlink.net/~nickthompson/naturaldesigns/
>
>
>
> *From:* Friam [mailto:friam-boun...@redfish.com] *On Behalf Of *Pieter
> Steenekamp
> *Sent:* Saturday, December 30, 2017 1:32 PM
ttp://home.earthlink.net/~nickthompson/naturaldesigns/>
http://home.earthlink.net/~nickthompson/naturaldesigns/
From: Friam [mailto:friam-boun...@redfish.com] On Behalf Of Prof David West
Sent: Saturday, December 30, 2017 8:36 PM
To: friam@redfish.com
Subject: Re: [FRIAM] Climate Change
In m
, 2017 1:32 PM *To:* The
> Friday Morning Applied Complexity Coffee Group <friam@redfish.com>
> *Subject:* Re: [FRIAM] Climate Change>
> Nick,
>
> *_What are the properties of GroupThought that is likely to survive
> experience into the deep future?_*>
&g
7 1:32 PM
To: The Friday Morning Applied Complexity Coffee Group <friam@redfish.com>
Subject: Re: [FRIAM] Climate Change
Nick,
What are the properties of GroupThought that is likely to survive experience
into the deep future?
Philip Tetlock has done excellent work answe
m-boun...@redfish.com> on behalf of Nick Thompson
<nickthomp...@earthlink.net>
Sent: Saturday, December 30, 2017 10:20:15 AM
To: 'The Friday Morning Applied Complexity Coffee Group'
Subject: Re: [FRIAM] Climate Change
Pieter,
Some months back, at the Friday Meeting of the FRIAM Mother Churc
essor of Psychology and Biology
>
> Clark University
>
> http://home.earthlink.net/~nickthompson/naturaldesigns/
>
>
>
> *From:* Friam [mailto:friam-boun...@redfish.com] *On Behalf Of *Pieter
> Steenekamp
> *Sent:* Saturday, December 30, 2017 5:27 AM
> *To:* The Fri
lexity Coffee Group <friam@redfish.com>
Subject: Re: [FRIAM] Climate Change
Glen,
I'd like to comment on your comment a few posts earlier:
"*That* is why I think focusing on the workflows (modeling) is important.
Those of us who distrust the experts bear the burden of proof
>> those periods wet or were they warm? Were they uniform across the global
>>> or localized to certain regions?
>>>
>>>
>>> Marcus
>>> --
>>> *From:* Friam <friam-boun...@redfish.com> on behalf of Nick Th
rm? Were they uniform across the global or
>> localized to certain regions?
>>
>>
>> Marcus
>> --
>> *From:* Friam <friam-boun...@redfish.com> on behalf of Nick Thompson <
>> nickthomp...@earthlink.net>
>> *Sent:
of Nick Thompson <
> nickthomp...@earthlink.net>
> *Sent:* Friday, December 29, 2017 8:27:21 PM
> *To:* 'The Friday Morning Applied Complexity Coffee Group'
>
> *Subject:* Re: [FRIAM] Climate Change
>
> I dunno, I thought Pietr's point was kind of interesting. IF (and I don't
>
egions?
Marcus
From: Friam <friam-boun...@redfish.com> on behalf of Nick Thompson
<nickthomp...@earthlink.net>
Sent: Friday, December 29, 2017 8:27:21 PM
To: 'The Friday Morning Applied Complexity Coffee Group'
Subject: Re: [FRIAM] Climate Change
I dunno, I th
Steve, I had hoped for awhile that climate change studies would yield the
possibility of a truly transdisciplinary breakthrough in complex systems
modeling, rather than the interdisciplinary effort you recall that provided
"useful checks and balances" on academic honestly. I take it from the
Psychology and Biology
Clark University
http://home.earthlink.net/~nickthompson/naturaldesigns/
-Original Message-
From: Friam [mailto:friam-boun...@redfish.com] On Behalf Of u?l? ?
Sent: Friday, December 29, 2017 5:40 PM
To: FriAM <friam@redfish.com>
Subject: Re: [FRIAM] Climate Change
Well
Well, I mean "models" writ large. Even when gathering and reducing
observational data, there's a workflow for doing that. That workflow relies on
a model of a sort. And integrating different data sets so that they're
commensurate also requires models. E.g. correlating tree ring based with
Pieter -
I think Eric responded extremely well to the actual gist of the (bent)
thread on Climate Change as it was elaborating.
The (thread's subject) question of whether there is significant
anthropogenic climate changes underway, the extent of them, how bad the
consequences are likely to be
Coffee Group <friam@redfish.com> Subject: Re: [FRIAM] Climate Change
"My problem is that I fear that we have passed the point of no possible remedy.
There was a meme which was a graph of global mean temperature for the last
several centuries. There was a sharp transient to the
hi
No. I was truly asking. Sorry if I came off like I know something you don't.
I did try to keep up with the open sourced climate models I knew about, but
never managed to do it. This might be a good resource:
https://climate.apache.org/
On 12/29/2017 11:45 AM, Pieter Steenekamp wrote:
>
Maybe I do not appreciate fully how the models have evolved since 1990. I
have studied the reports and even for me it's it'd very complicated. Do you
mind giving me a simple explanation of what you are referring to?
On 29 December 2017 at 21:28, uǝlƃ ☣ wrote:
> I agree
I agree that admitting one's mistakes and specifying (honest) uncertainty lends
credibility. But, as Eric says in his recent post, expressions of uncertainty
can be abused, as well. In this regard, scientists face a very difficult
dilemma.
It's interesting to consider a topic just as
Sorry; it would have helped if I had spelled your name correctly the first time.
Hurry is not of God,
Eric
> On Dec 29, 2017, at 12:18 PM, Eric Smith wrote:
>
> Hi Peter,
>
> By all means. I do not intend either aggression or even disrespect toward
> anybody who will
Hi Peter,
By all means. I do not intend either aggression or even disrespect toward
anybody who will argue any position honestly and in good faith.
The thing that I was attacking below, and which I think needs to be regarded as
an existential threat, is what I interpret as coordinated acting
Thank you, I do appreciate.
Let me start with my background. I have done modeling for predictions in
engineering applications as a major part of my professional career of 40
years. I am now doing deep learning for making predictions. (Not
necessarily relevant to this discussion, but I do combine
Yes, I think so. The trick, I think, is to demonstrate respect for those with
whom we disagree. If someone posts, without rancor, an argument (preferably
with data) arguing that the models are wrong in a crucial way, I know *I* would
be interested.
I've posted tons of contrarian and
Is it possible to have, in this group, a civil discussion where the
accepted view of the IPCC that unless we reduce CO2 emissions we are
heading for disaster is challenged?
On 29 December 2017 at 20:25, Eric Smith wrote:
> I agree with both Glen and Jillian,
>
> this is
I agree with both Glen and Jillian,
this is more on the right tack. It’s not about stupidity. It’s about a kind
of character degeneracy further down, and a certain kind of vileness that
becomes possible at that level.
I would add one thing to Jill’s and Glen’s emphasis (attention trolling),
Sorry. A draft has gone.
On Friday, December 29, 2017, Alfredo Covaleda Vélez
wrote:
> A couple of years ago was published that about simulations predicting
permanent freezing un Europeos and North America because of global warming.
>
> On Friday, December 29, 2017, Jochen
A couple of years ago was published that about simulations predicting
permanent freezing un Europeos and North America because of global warming.
On Friday, December 29, 2017, Jochen Fromm wrote:
> This is what Donald wrote on Twitter tonight:
> "In the East, it could be the
A couple of years ago It was published about simulations predicting
permanent freezing in Europe and North America because of global warming.
So, maybe Trump is right.You are welcome here but we are already too much
people un the third world.
On Friday, December 29, 2017, Jochen Fromm
You called it, Gillian. Trump and his ilk (Milo, Spencer, etc.) thrive on
their ability to invoke. Beliefs and knowledge take a back seat, which is why
they are so capable of munging the facts and changing their tune when
confronted.
So I have to disagree fundamentally with Nick, Merle, Tom,
s.
Marcus
From: Friam <friam-boun...@redfish.com> on behalf of Tom Johnson
<t...@jtjohnson.com>
Sent: Friday, December 29, 2017 9:50:30 AM
To: The Friday Morning Applied Complexity Coffee Group
Subject: Re: [FRIAM] Climate Change
I think, too, it is a fundamen
al.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Confirmation_bias
-J.
Original message From: Nick Thompson
<nickthomp...@earthlink.net> Date: 12/29/17 16:13 (GMT+01:00) To: 'The Friday
Morning Applied Complexity Coffee Group' <friam@redfish.com> Subject: Re:
[FRIAM] Climate Change
Th
He is one of these:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Internet_troll
The games I enjoy have a zero tollerance pollicy for trolls. The giant jerk
kind that just want attention. Generally the community ignores them. Then a
Game Assistant bans them. Then that company shows other companies about the
>> Nicholas S. Thompson
>>
>> Emeritus Professor of Psychology and Biology
>>
>> Clark University
>>
>> http://home.earthlink.net/~nickthompson/naturaldesigns/
>>
>>
>>
>> *From:* Friam [mailto:friam-boun...@redfish.com] *On Behalf Of *Joch
rk University
>
> http://home.earthlink.net/~nickthompson/naturaldesigns/
>
>
>
> *From:* Friam [mailto:friam-boun...@redfish.com] *On Behalf Of *Jochen
> Fromm
> *Sent:* Friday, December 29, 2017 1:23 AM
> *To:* The Friday Morning Applied Complexity Coffee Group <
> friam@red
To: The Friday Morning Applied Complexity Coffee Group <friam@redfish.com>
Subject: [FRIAM] Climate Change
This is what Donald wrote on Twitter tonight:
"In the East, it could be the COLDEST New Year’s Eve on record. Perhaps we
could use a little bit of that good old Global Warming that
Yes, he’s really that stupid. And is manipulated by people who know better, but
whose short-term interests are best served by pretending global climate change
is a fiction.
> On Dec 29, 2017, at 12:23 AM, Jochen Fromm wrote:
>
> This is what Donald wrote on Twitter
Yes.
I suspect that climate change, including global warming, would require that
locally, in some locations, colder than normal conditions would occur.
Frank
Frank Wimberly
https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Frank_Wimberly2
Phone (505) 670-9918
On Dec 29, 2017 1:23 AM, "Jochen Fromm"
This is what Donald wrote on Twitter tonight:"In the East, it could be the
COLDEST New Year’s Eve on record. Perhaps we could use a little bit of that
good old Global Warming that our Country, but not other countries, was going to
pay TRILLIONS OF DOLLARS to protect against. Bundle
Dear All,
Sometime this spring, I thought, we discussed a recent consensus document on
Climate Change issued by some scientific panel. I assume I learned about it
in email, but I have gone through all my emails and not found it. Can
anybody remember what that report was and who issued it?
Given the recent discussion of climate change and the connection with
complexity, I thought you all might enjoy this article I recently
wrote: http://blog.sciencenews.org/mathtrek/2007/08/
cloudy_crystal_balls.html.
More generally, I'd like to plug MathTrek, my weekly math column for
FYI Paul
Science 10 August 2007:
Vol. 317. no. 5839, pp. 746 - 747
DOI: 10.1126/science.317.5839.746
News Focus
CLIMATE CHANGE:
Humans and Nature Duel Over the Next Decade's Climate
Richard A. Kerr
Rising greenhouse gases are changing global climate, but during the next few
Some of you may be interested in the specific interventions suggested by the
United Nations Development Programme (my former employer) to adapt to
climate change: ABMs might be useful for some of these strategies.
_http://www.undp.org/gef/adaptation/climate_change/02d.htm_
92 matches
Mail list logo