-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Mikhail Gorelkin wrote:
...let's use this: the minimal description, which works. ? --Mikhail
The problem is whether or not complexity is an inherent property or an
ascribed attribute. If it's an ascribed attribute, then the above is as
good a
Hi,
Mikhail Gorelkin wrote:
Just two thoughts: 1) it seems that complexity is a more fundamental category
than linearity / non-linearity,
which are parts of a sophisticated ***formal*** system;
How would you imagine a complex system which is not non-linear? I would
say that linear =
Hi Günther,
That article in Wiki about Kolmogorov complexity
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kolmogorov_complexity answers all these questions
perfectly - better than me :-( ?
Regards,
--Mikhail
- Original Message -
From: Günther Greindl [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: The Friday Morning Applied
Could you say why those points are 'problems'? It seems to me that a
situated explanatory complexity (as opposed to descriptive) works
fine (I'm not necessarily suggesting it's better) so long as you have
situated the equivalences sufficiently. Ascribed (interesting word) can
be just as
