Thanks, Glen,
Kind of you to respond.
I will do a bit of larding below.
Nick
Nicholas S. Thompson
Emeritus Professor of Psychology and Biology
Clark University
http://home.earthlink.net/~nickthompson/naturaldesigns/
-Original Message-
From: Friam
Frank,
I think Glen would reply that minor has all sorts of association that provide
some predictability.
I can’t fight every battle in every email
Yes. And immediately I have felt really stupid for feeling that. How on earth
could another’s pain meliorate mine!
What was
Part of the pain comes from feeling unique in one's defect.
What happened Monday?
Frank
Frank Wimberly
Phone (505) 670-9918
On Jun 20, 2017 8:01 PM, "Nick Thompson" wrote:
> Frank,
>
>
>
>
>
> I think Glen would reply that minor has all sorts of association that
p.s. Did you see the article on the possibility that the Universe is
conscious? Pretty distinguished supporters.
Frank Wimberly
Phone (505) 670-9918
On Jun 20, 2017 9:21 PM, "Frank Wimberly" wrote:
> No one notified me about a time/place. Maybe they knew I wouldn't
On June 20, 2017 6:14:49 PM PDT, Nick Thompson
wrote:
>
>[NST==>I assume you would agree that “unmarried because unmarried” is
>perniciously circular. Right? Just checking. <==nst]
Vapid, yes. Shallow, yes. Perhaps even vicious. But it's a little too empty,
Nick,
[NST==>I suppose that one could argue that any time one writes a sentence of
the form, A is a B, one has launched into metaphor. <==nst]
What about, “every planet in the Solar System that is closer to the Sun than
Jupiter is a minor planet.”
Why didn’t you challenge Glen’s use
No one notified me about a time/place. Maybe they knew I wouldn't yield on
the ineffability of consciousness.
Maybe knowing everyone dies strengthens the oceanic feeling.
Frank
Frank Wimberly
Phone (505) 670-9918
On Jun 20, 2017 9:17 PM, "Nick Thompson" wrote:
>
Frank,
The Metaphor group. I thought you were going to go along?
To you point about uniqueness. It’s odd. Misery does love company, I suppose.
But, I mean, really? The only reason not to be bummed by not being unique, is
if the banality of one’s pain suggests a solution. But that
On June 20, 2017 8:16:57 PM PDT, Nick Thompson
wrote:
>
>I dunno. I never quite know what Glen is on about. But I tended to
>read his response in terms of his cancer. He is saying, “I am
>comforted by knowing that I am not the only man with cancer.” If I
>were
Just in case it needs to be stated, explicitly, I'm also interested in your
deliberations. At a minimum, it would be very cool to see a reading list,
things your collective feel are important to being able to hold a conversation
in the domain.
On 06/18/2017 09:46 PM, Nick Thompson wrote:
>
Y'all say:
In
http://redfish.com/pipermail/friam_redfish.com/attachments/20170619/f46244d3/attachment-0001.pdf:
>
>
> If our analysis is correct, then the distinction between explanation and
> description takes
> on an entirely new importance in science.
> ...
> The young man thinks, "This
Figure 1: The machines are coming!
From: Friam [mailto:friam-boun...@redfish.com] On Behalf Of Roger Critchlow
Sent: Tuesday, June 20, 2017 9:40 AM
To: The Friday Morning Applied Complexity Coffee Group
Subject: [FRIAM] All Your Them Are One Model To Us Learn
Apropos my
Wow, Roger. I don't get all this, but tell me---does this change
everything for modelers?
On Tue, Jun 20, 2017 at 9:39 AM, Roger Critchlow wrote:
> Apropos my babbling about all patterns being patterns and all the
> mechanisms that recognize patterns being an incomprehensible
Table 3 suggests that there are general information processing features that
translate across domains. Table 4 suggests that becoming an expert in many
things doesn’t make you (much) of a worse expert in any one thing. Don’t pull
your kid out of liberal arts college just yet? And weirdly
Apropos my babbling about all patterns being patterns and all the
mechanisms that recognize patterns being an incomprehensible jumble of
mechanisms, Google shares One Model to Learn Them All,
https://arxiv.org/abs/1706.05137, in which it turns out that throwing all
the architectural elements from
On 06/20/2017 11:15 AM, Marcus Daniels wrote:
> The last thing you want is your personal assistant robot putting your
> Labradoodle in the refrigerator.
But what if you want to eat the other half later?
--
☣ glen
FRIAM Applied
16 matches
Mail list logo