Hey kids, whazup?
On Sat, May 15, 2010 at 11:40 AM, Thor (Hammer of God)
t...@hammerofgod.com wrote:
If you are still running Windows 95 that's your problem.
Nevertheless, if one runs Windows 7, here is the problem:
http://en.windows7sins.org/
Regards,
Marcio Barbado, Jr.
Oh my G!
I'm going to quote that site next time I get to help a *nix newbie figure
out permissions without sudo.
Seriously by that reason I could accuse linux users of exerting too much
freedom giving the allusion of godly control - which as you might have
guessed is a sin.
...unless you
On Tue, May 18, 2010 at 11:27:22AM -0400, valdis.kletni...@vt.edu wrote:
(Note that the esteemed Mr READ_THE_LIST_CHARTER overlooked unknown
knowns - that class
of stuff we don't realize or refuse to admit we actually *do* know:
ok, i know i am a writer not a reader (like a narcisist
On 18 May 2010 at 14:40, Thor (Hammer of God) wrote:
In fact, this thread has inspired me to add a new section to the
Hammer of God website (currently undergoing major renovation)
Uh-huh... get a new version of Dreamweaver did we? :)
I just want to make sure you understand that *I* didn't
Message-
From: full-disclosure-boun...@lists.grok.org.uk
[mailto:full-disclosure-boun...@lists.grok.org.uk] On Behalf Of lsi
Sent: Wednesday, May 19, 2010 1:08 PM
To: full-disclosure@lists.grok.org.uk
Subject: Re: [Full-disclosure] Windows' future (reprise)
On 18 May 2010 at 14:40, Thor (Hammer
Sent from my HTC
-Original Message-
From: Thor (Hammer of God) t...@hammerofgod.com
Sent: 15 May 2010 21:59
To: full-disclosure@lists.grok.org.uk full-disclosure@lists.grok.org.uk
Subject: Re: [Full-disclosure] Windows' future (reprise)
No, It's Tim Mullen. No Bill here.
No, I don't
-disclosure@lists.grok.org.uk
Subject: Re: [Full-disclosure] Windows' future (reprise)
No, It's Tim Mullen. No Bill here.
No, I don't misunderstand: You said You may recall that last year, the
average annual growth rate of new threats (as defined by Symantec) was 243%.
This enabled me to predict
@lists.grok.org.uk
Subject: Re: [Full-disclosure] Windows' future (reprise)
Happens they are completely unrelated stories. Also happens that I won't fall
for someone's hysteria from using windows.
By the way, I don't know you, but I would depend on the _fact_ that I've been
using a product without a hitch
On Sun, May 16, 2010 at 08:49:29PM -0400, valdis.kletni...@vt.edu wrote:
On Sun, 16 May 2010 23:49:00 BST, lsi said:
Malware is flooding at 243% (+/- error). This is consuming the
oxygen in your machine.
The basic error in your analysis is that although there may in fact be
snip
why
To: full-disclosure@lists.grok.org.uk full-disclosure@lists.grok.org.uk
Subject: Re: [Full-disclosure] Windows' future (reprise)
No, It's Tim Mullen. No Bill here.
No, I don't misunderstand: You said You may recall that last year, the
average annual growth rate of new threats (as defined
On Tue, 18 May 2010 18:00:52 +0300, Georgi Guninski said:
why flame about constants about detectable malware when the world missed
100% of the undetectable malware? :)
There are known knowns. These are things we know that we know. There are known
unknowns. That is to say, there are things that
[mailto:uuf6...@gmail.com]
Sent: Tuesday, May 18, 2010 3:40 AM
To: Cassidy MacFarlane
Cc: Thor (Hammer of God); full-disclosure@lists.grok.org.uk
Subject: Re: [Full-disclosure] Windows' future (reprise)
Happens they are completely unrelated stories. Also happens that I
won't fall for someone's hysteria
--On Tuesday, May 18, 2010 14:40:45 + Thor (Hammer of God)
t...@hammerofgod.com wrote:
What messages warning you from using Windows? I certainly hope you do not
have me confused with the OP – I already used the term “hysteria” to
describe his ideas and subsequent recommendations. The
Is my business at risk, if I
say the wrong thing, and my customers go out of business because
their hardware/software combination is no longer viable? I imagine
these questions are on the minds of many IT managers, and with a
chart on the wall showing 243% mutation, it is only reasonable that
On 16 May 2010 at 20:49, valdis.kletni...@vt.edu wrote:
To: stu...@cyberdelix.net
Copies to: full-disclosure@lists.grok.org.uk
Subject:Re: [Full-disclosure] Windows' future (reprise)
From: valdis.kletni...@vt.edu
Date sent: Sun, 16 May 2010 20:49:29 -0400
On Sun, 16 May
On 17 May 2010 at 18:08, Thor (Hammer of God) wrote:
Is my business at risk, if I
say the wrong thing, and my customers go out of business because
their hardware/software combination is no longer viable?
In business, you are always exposed to some level of risk when you
charge for
On 17 May 2010 at 0:18, valdis.kletni...@vt.edu wrote:
On Mon, 17 May 2010 03:48:36 BST, lsi said:
It is mutating at approx 243% per annum, a rate which is more than
twice as fast as Moore's Law (200% every 24 months). I do find this
alarming, because I want my CPU back. So does
: Sun, 16 May 2010 03:06:18 +
Subject:Re: [Full-disclosure] Windows' future (reprise)
This just gets better all the time. I have to admit, it was fun at
first, but now's I grow weary, mostly because this is just sad.
For you to actually think that one can't find out how
, especially as time passes,
that'll be just a blip before long.
Stu
On 15 May 2010 at 14:59, Christian Sciberras wrote:
Date sent: Sat, 15 May 2010 14:59:46 +0100
Subject:Re: [Full-disclosure] Windows' future (reprise)
From: Christian Sciberras uuf6429 () gmail com
To: stuart
, 16 May 2010 19:08:26 +
Subject:Re: [Full-disclosure] Windows' future (reprise)
The error in your overall thesis is your failure to identify the difference
between threat and risk. You are interacting with Symantec's report of x
new threats as if it actually means something
On Sun, 16 May 2010 23:49:00 BST, lsi said:
Malware is flooding at 243% (+/- error). This is consuming the
oxygen in your machine.
The basic error in your analysis is that although there may in fact be
243% more malware samples, that doesn't translate into 243% more oxygen
consumption.
: Thor (Hammer of God) t...@hammerofgod.com
To: full-disclosure@lists.grok.org.uk
full-disclosure@lists.grok.org.uk
Date sent: Sun, 16 May 2010 19:08:26 +
Subject:Re: [Full-disclosure] Windows' future (reprise)
The error in your overall thesis is your failure
On Mon, 17 May 2010 03:48:36 BST, lsi said:
It is mutating at approx 243% per annum, a rate which is more than
twice as fast as Moore's Law (200% every 24 months). I do find this
alarming, because I want my CPU back. So does everyone else I know.
Unfortunately, you haven't shown that the
...@lists.grok.org.uk
[mailto:full-disclosure-boun...@lists.grok.org.uk] On Behalf Of lsi
Sent: Saturday, May 15, 2010 6:12 AM
To: full-disclosure@lists.grok.org.uk
Subject: [Full-disclosure] Windows' future (reprise)
Hi All!
Just a followup from my posting of 9 months ago (which can be found
here):
http
On Sat, 15 May 2010 14:40:29 +
Thor (Hammer of God) t...@hammerofgod.com wrote:
And for the record, these claims of 'inherent insecurity' in Windows
are simply ignorant. If you are still running Windows 95 that's your
problem. Do a little research before post assertions based on 10 or
That kind of goes for everything, doesn't it?
T
On May 15, 2010, at 10:32 AM, Peter Besenbruch p...@lava.net wrote:
On Sat, 15 May 2010 14:40:29 +
Thor (Hammer of God) t...@hammerofgod.com wrote:
And for the record, these claims of 'inherent insecurity' in Windows
are simply
: Sat, 15 May 2010 14:40:29 +
Subject:Re: [Full-disclosure] Windows' future (reprise)
I am constantly amazed at posts like this where you make yourself sound like
some sort of statistical genius because you were able to predict that since
last year was %243, that this year
An interesting point - Unicode?
I don't think 5Mb files are infeasible, especially as time passes,
that'll be just a blip before long.
Stu
On 15 May 2010 at 14:59, Christian Sciberras wrote:
Date sent: Sat, 15 May 2010 14:59:46 +0100
Subject:Re: [Full-disclosure] Windows
-disclosure@lists.grok.org.uk full-
disclos...@lists.grok.org.uk
Date sent: Sat, 15 May 2010 14:40:29 +
Subject: Re: [Full-disclosure] Windows' future (reprise)
I am constantly amazed at posts like this where you make yourself sound like
some sort of statistical
On Sat, May 15, 2010 at 7:40 AM, Thor (Hammer of God)
t...@hammerofgod.com wrote:
I am constantly amazed at posts like this where you make yourself sound like
some sort of statistical genius because you were able to predict that since
last year was %243, that this year would be %243. Wow.
[mailto:full-disclosure-boun...@lists.grok.org.uk] On Behalf Of lsi
Sent: Saturday, May 15, 2010 1:07 PM
To: full-disclosure@lists.grok.org.uk
Subject: Re: [Full-disclosure] Windows' future (reprise)
Is that you, Bill?
I think you misunderstand. 9 months ago, I measured the growth rate at 243%,
using
On Sat, May 15, 2010 at 1:22 PM, Jeffrey Walton noloa...@gmail.com wrote:
As opposed to crowd sourcing, which some claim is inherently more
secure because more [uneducated] eyes review the source code?
There are far more educated eyes able to review the Linux source code
than the Windows source
-disclosure] Windows' future
(reprise)
I am constantly amazed at posts like this where you make yourself
sound like some sort of statistical genius because you were able
to predict that since last year was %243, that this year would be
%243. Wow. Really?
And for the record, these claims
Sent from my HTC Touch Pro2 on the Now Network from Sprint®.
-Original Message-
From: BMF badmotherfs...@gmail.com
Sent: Saturday, May 15, 2010 4:54 PM
To: full-disclosure@lists.grok.org.uk full-disclosure@lists.grok.org.uk
Subject: Re: [Full-disclosure] Windows' future (reprise
On Sat, 15 May 2010 16:22:26 -0400
Jeffrey Walton noloa...@gmail.com wrote:
This is
along the lines of, 'Linux does not get viruses' argument. Give me a
break...
I set up a dual boot arrangement on a friend's machine. The Windows
side promptly got infected. The guy was furious and blamed his
-
disclos...@lists.grok.org.uk
Date sent:Sat, 15 May 2010 14:40:29 +
Subject: Re: [Full-disclosure] Windows' future (reprise)
I am constantly amazed at posts like this where you make yourself sound
like some sort of statistical genius because you were able
...@lists.grok.org.uk
[mailto:full-disclosure-boun...@lists.grok.org.uk] On Behalf Of lsi
Sent: Saturday, May 15, 2010 7:15 PM
To: full-disclosure@lists.grok.org.uk
Subject: Re: [Full-disclosure] Windows' future (reprise)
On 16 May 2010 at 0:09, Thor (Hammer of God) wrote:
Just as I expected. A wishy
On 16 May 2010, at 04:06, Thor (Hammer of God) wrote:
Oh, one last thing - your dear Pegasus 4.51 Windows-based program that you
hypocritically hold on to while demonizing Windows and .NET was... wait for
it wait for it written with Visual Studio 2008 C++ - a proud
Microsoft
03:06:18 +
Subject:Re: [Full-disclosure] Windows' future (reprise)
This just gets better all the time. I have to admit, it was fun at first,
but now's I grow weary, mostly because this is just sad.
For you to actually think that one can't find out how much free drive
39 matches
Mail list logo
