Re: [Full-disclosure] Fwd: Google vulnerabilities with PoC

2014-03-15 Thread antisnatchor
that you're right. Maybe you can create the next LOIC specifically tailored to DoS Youtube with this serious bug, ROFL! Cheers antisnatchor Nicholas Lemonias. wrote: If you wish to talk seriously about the problem, please send me an email privately. And we can talk about what we have found so far

Re: [Full-disclosure] Google vulnerabilities with PoC

2014-03-15 Thread antisnatchor
don't have a clue. Cheers antisnatchor Mario Vilas wrote: I believe Zalewski has explained very well why it isn't a vulnerability, and you couldn't possibly be calling him hostile. :) On Sat, Mar 15, 2014 at 11:20 AM, M Kirschbaum pr...@yahoo.co.uk wrote: I have been watching this thread

Re: [Full-disclosure] Google vulnerabilities with PoC

2014-03-14 Thread antisnatchor
to pay you for such a bug. Same with this bug. Cheers antisnatchor On Fri, Mar 14, 2014 at 6:04 AM, Jerome Athias athiasjer...@gmail.comwrote: Hi I concur that we are mainly discussing a terminology problem. In the context of a Penetration Test or WAPT, this is a Finding. Reporting

Re: [Full-disclosure] Fwd: Google vulnerabilities with PoC

2014-03-14 Thread antisnatchor
LOL you're hopeless. Good luck with your business. Brave customers! Cheers antisnatchor Nicholas Lemonias. wrote: People can read the report if they like. Can't you even do basic things like reading a vulnerability report? Can't you see that the advisory is about writing arbitrary files

Re: [Full-disclosure] Fwd: Google vulnerabilities with PoC

2014-03-14 Thread antisnatchor
...@googlemail.com Date: Fri, Mar 14, 2014 at 5:58 PM Subject: Re: [Full-disclosure] Fwd: Google vulnerabilities with PoC To: antisnatchor antisnatc...@gmail.com mailto:antisnatc...@gmail.com Says the script kiddie... Beg for some publicity. My customers

Re: [Full-disclosure] Fwd: Google vulnerabilities with PoC

2014-03-14 Thread antisnatchor
at 5:58 PM Subject: Re: [Full-disclosure] Fwd: Google vulnerabilities with PoC To: antisnatchor antisnatc...@gmail.com mailto:antisnatc...@gmail.com Says the script kiddie... Beg for some publicity. My customers are FTSE

Re: [Full-disclosure] Google vulnerabilities with PoC

2014-03-13 Thread antisnatchor
file upload functionality in a PHP application on Apache that expects files with extension .png only, and you manage to upload an .asp file. Security-wise that's not a risk. Cheers antisnatchor Nicholas Lemonias. wrote: Google vulnerabilities uncovered... http://news.softpedia.com/news/Expert

Re: [Full-disclosure] Results of a XSLT fuzzing effort

2013-03-08 Thread antisnatchor
Nice one Nick, great job eheh :D Cheers antisnatchor Nicolas GrégoireMarch 8, 2013 10:12 AM Hi!I published last week a blog post describing the results of the XSLTfuzzing campaign I did in 2012. Now that most of the discoveredvulnerabilities are patched, I've chosen to give away

Re: [Full-disclosure] [0 Day] XSS Persistent in Blogspot of Google

2013-01-29 Thread antisnatchor
certificates and so on :D Cheers antisnatchor Michal ZalewskiJanuary 27, 2013 7:17 PM OGMMM WTFF 0DAY XSSSorry, getting a bit tired of these.Well, the world is changing. You can probably do a lot more direct damage with a (legit) XSS in a high-value site than with a local privilege