FW Cure for the cancer of capitalism (Korten) (fwd)

1999-10-11 Thread S. Lerner
X-Sender: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Mon, 04 Oct 1999 18:27:48 -0400 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] From: Bob Olsen [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Cure for the cancer of capitalism (Korten) Mime-Version: 1.0 David Korten says: "The relationship of capitalism to a market economy is that of a

New From the CCPA

1999-10-11 Thread S. Lerner
Date: Fri, 08 Oct 1999 14:24:42 -0400 From: Bruce Campbell [EMAIL PROTECTED] Organization: CCPA X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: New From the CCPA October --1999 Dear members and friends of the CCPA From: Bruce Campbell, Executive Director This is the

Can we stand a little satirical levity?

1999-10-11 Thread Ed Goertzen
Sometimes it is important to to break down the barriers that prevent inovation. "One amoeba said to the other (with a wink?) a million years ago, "think of the potential." Christmas '88 At this time of year the contrasts of material and spiritual affluence and poverty are especially

The Free Market Hoax

1999-10-11 Thread Ed Goertzen
Hi All: I continue to submit that the problem is not "free market capitalism." Rather it is the money system that is at fault. Using the definition that capital is "stored value" either material or knowledge, skills etc., capital is a good thing and would that we all had plenty of it. The

Re: God save us from .pdf files!

1999-10-11 Thread Colin Stark
At 05:29 PM 10/11/1999 -0400, Ray Evans Harrell wrote: Why? Snip Colin Stark wrote: God save us from attachments! Seldom is there anything in the attachment that is graphically significant. Usually the message is adequately transmitted by cutting/pasting into the e-mail program.

Re: God save us from .pdf files!

1999-10-11 Thread Ray E. Harrell
Why? You seem to have a lot to say. In fact reading more in the form of some extended writing or a graphic or two seems reasonable. Junk mail should be junked and I do. I never open an attachment from someone that I do not know. I don't like bugs. But the limitations of my lists often

Re: God save us from .pdf files!

1999-10-11 Thread Christoph Reuss
So I would say make more and better attachments! REH, no point in argueing about this: Sending attachments to a list violates the official Netiquette, is a waste of bandwidth and clutters up the harddisks of hundreds of users, many of which can't decode the attachment anyway and/or don't even

Re: 87 YEAR-OLD PERSON REFLECTS ON MODERN TIMES

1999-10-11 Thread Brad McCormick, Ed.D.
Christoph Reuss wrote: Brad McCormick couldn't resist either: "Free markets" are oxymorons! The only way to have a "free market" is to have a strong police force to curtail the muggers' freedom to participate in the freedom of the market! Naah... A strong police force would mean

Re: God save us from .pdf files!

1999-10-11 Thread Brad McCormick, Ed.D.
Ray E. Harrell wrote: Why? You seem to have a lot to say. In fact reading more in the form of some extended writing or a graphic or two seems reasonable. Junk mail should be junked and I do. I never open an attachment from someone that I do not know. I don't like bugs. But the

Re: God save us from .pdf files!

1999-10-11 Thread Ray E. Harrell
I believe this list has ban on attachments. As for web sites, I rarely look since I find the content is often more out of context than a dialogue on list. An attachment is to me, a footnote which may or may not be opened.I often do not open it if the person has convinced me that they are