Re: FW: / BI: Harry Pollard and Philosophy

2000-04-18 Thread Keith Hudson
Robert, At 18:41 17/04/00 -0400, you wrote: Keith, in commenting on my response to Harry Pollard, wrote: "This is a crude way of interpreting history." I was not interpreting history. I was criticizing the idea of the use of philosophy as a methodology of solving very immediate and practical

Re: Sweatshops

2000-04-18 Thread Edward R Weick
Mike, the difference between us may be that I see the glass as half empty. The industrial revolution required a tremendous build up of capital but also a tremendous build up of labour. Because it was so heavily involved in the new processes of production, and because of the fluidity of society

Battle of Washington

2000-04-18 Thread Edward R Weick
The following is from today's Globe and Mail. Ed Weick Global justice? Don't make me laugh ANDREW MILLS Tuesday, April 18, 2000 The movements of my parents' generation were straightforward: civil rights, Ban the Bomb, anti-Vietnam war. I am a 19-year-old history student; my generation's

Re: Sweatshops

2000-04-18 Thread Cordell . Arthur
small but important (I think)point. Ed, Arthur has also commented that the kinds of criticisms which I leveled at the Washington protesters were also leveled at the kids who were protesting the Vietnam War. I think there's a difference. The Vietnam protesters were opposing something specific

Fw: L.A. Times column, 4/17/00

2000-04-18 Thread Michael Gurstein
- Original Message - From: Gary Chapman [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, April 17, 2000 12:17 PM Subject: L.A. Times column, 4/17/00 Friends, Below is my Los Angeles Times column for today, Monday, April 17, 2000. As always, please feel free to pass this on,

RE: Battle of Washington

2000-04-18 Thread Cordell . Arthur
Yup. The word you are looking for is, I believe, parody. A word that defines much of what is going on these days. Question is what will authentic reaction and rebellion look like? -- From: Edward R Weick To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Battle of Washington Date: Tuesday, April 18, 2000

Re: Sweatshops

2000-04-18 Thread Edward R Weick
- Original Message - From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, April 18, 2000 9:59 AM Subject: Re: Sweatshops small but important (I think)point. Arthur It was very difficult for those who protested the Vietnam war.

RE: Battle of Washington

2000-04-18 Thread Timework Web
ANDREW MILLS wrote in the Globe and Mail Last Saturday, I took a seat on one of the four Canadian Auto Workers' subsidized buses full of communists and churchgoers, Luddites and lesbians bound for Washington to join the protests. - snip - It was rare to find a protester who could

The Tory World View

2000-04-18 Thread WesBurt
To: Citizen's Income Online at URL http://citiinco01.uuhost.uk.uu.net/discussion/index.shtml and friends on several mail lists Good day folks, Mr. Douglas P. Wilson's forceful presentation of the Tory world view, which is known to us colonials as the Conservative world view, seems to have

Re: Sweatshops

2000-04-18 Thread Edward R Weick
Hi Mike, Let me try to restate my argument. Economic growth requires certain basic conditions. I would not pretend to know what all of these are, but stability and the possibility of upward mobility would, I suspect, be among them. I would also include the existence of capital; not only capital

Re: Sweatshops

2000-04-18 Thread Mike Hollinshead
Hi Ed, I agree with the role of plunder and greed in the English Industrial Revolution. They played a role. But it has not been true of all industrial revolutions. There was no plundering and greed in the medieval European industrial revolution. The driving actors were a religious order (the