Hi Ray,
. . . heavily cropped I'm afraid . . .
At 00:46 02/10/01 -0400, you wrote:
snip
(REH)
Note how afraid people on this list are to examining seriously the
claims of the fanatics that blew up a segment of the city.
(KH)
As far as I'm concerned, it's not a matter of being afraid of
KH:
That being so, I think that economics, rather like sociology, or politics,
or history (with laws buried somewhere, but at a deep level), must always
remain as a 'literary' subject, which is best written about rather than
being relied upon.
Aha! An explanation at last! When I was in
BRAD ALSO SAID:
Why don't we start consistently supporting human dignity which
can only exist in a peer environment, and give up all forms of
art with leaders and followers (and impersonal
audiences) as outgrown forms of life, even
if they have their nostalgic appeal to some of us.
One other
KH:
That being so, I think that economics, rather like sociology, or
politics,
or history (with laws buried somewhere, but at a deep level), must
always
remain as a 'literary' subject, which is best written about rather than
being relied upon.
Ed Weick:
Aha! An explanation at last!
: Wednesday, October 03, 2001 6:56 PM
Subject: Re: Appendix: Distance-working/Low-rise buildings
Ray Evans Harrell wrote:
Brad said:
The hidden
curriculum of Beethoven's 9th is: obey the conductor
or else!, however humanistic may be the words thus
generated by the chorus.
Not true
Keith and Ray,
Keith, you certainly started a fascinating exchange of ideas. It has been
fun reading them. About cities - and, if I may, a quick primer on Political
Economy - which was classical economics and dealt with people. Bear with
the length of this bit because it will connect with the
To the list:
Mea culpa, mea culpa - this message was sent to a friend who has never heard
of the list or Keith or Ray.
I didn't notice the cc address and thought I was no longer subscribed as a
sending member.
To Keith - of course I do not think you are anything but a careful thinker,
I just
As soon as I sent my previous message to this List, I downloaded the latest
edition of yesterday's New York Times to find the following article which
begins thus:
Many Once-Thriving Cities Are Suddenly Hurting
By Mary Williams Walsh
The Economic Fallout
Sept. 11, most people agree, changed
Subject: Appendix: Distance-working/Low-rise buildings
As soon as I sent my previous message to this List, I downloaded the
latest
edition of yesterday's New York Times to find the following article which
begins thus:
Many Once-Thriving Cities Are Suddenly Hurting
By Mary Williams Walsh
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, October 01, 2001 3:38 AM
Subject: Appendix: Distance-working/Low-rise buildings
As soon as I sent my previous message to this List, I downloaded the
latest
edition of yesterday's New York Times to find the following article which
begins thus
Ray Evans Harrell wrote:
Keith the last two posts I've sent to Futurework have gotten through only to
the people on the list that I CCed.So this may be only between the two
of us.
Questions:
1. Who's going to sing all of that choral music if you don't have cities?
[snip]
Why don't
- Original Message -
From: Keith Hudson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Ray Evans Harrell [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, October 01, 2001 3:00 PM
Subject: Re: Appendix: Distance-working/Low-rise buildings
Hi Keith,
Hi Ray,
At 10:08 01/10/01 -0400, Ray Harrell wrote
12 matches
Mail list logo
