March 19, 2003 11:44 AM
Subject: Re: It's the testosterone (was Re: [Futurework] Powerful stuff!
> Ray,
>
> You rest a lot of faith in the "green light". Apparently Carter (a
> warmonger if we've ever had one) did nothing about Saddam's intention to
> inva
Ray,
You rest a lot of faith in the "green light". Apparently Carter (a
warmonger if we've ever had one) did nothing about Saddam's intention to
invade Iran. The truth is we couldn't do anything anyway - except supply
parts for Iran's F4 Phantoms.
When Saddam went into Iran, he went with 190,0
Karen,
By first brief read shows some frightening things.
Has the series been on, or is it about to be shown?
Harry
---
Karen wrote:
Frontline is broadcasting an extraordinary two hour The Long Road to War
that is a compilat
for the
bankrupt Sadaam to invade Kuwait? Too much time spent on that drug at
Kinnebunkport.
Cussin REH
- Original Message -
From:
Karen
Watters Cole
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, March 17, 2003 11:24
PM
Subject: RE: It'
Frontline
is broadcasting an extraordinary two hour The Long Road to War that is a compilation
of previous documentaries on our long relationship and history with Saddam
Hussein.
Take a
look at http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/pages/frontline/shows/longroad/
Karen
I haven't been follow
2003 7:58 PMTo: Keith
Hudson; Harry PollardCc:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]Subject: Re: It's the testosterone
(was Re: [Futurework] Powerful stuff!
Well, you can protest all you want but the
statement reads:
5. BOTH SADAT AND FAHD PROVIDED OTHER BITS OF USEFUL
INTELLIGENCE
gt;
Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, March 17, 2003 3:59 PM
Subject: Re: It's the testosterone (was Re:
[Futurework] Powerful stuff!
> Ray,> > Back in the 70's, Iran was the threat even
though they made a mess of > things - executing their army top brass and
killin
andar also
might be asked to give a complete account of what the Saudi government
knows and what its leaders told Saddam in 1980.
Robert Parry Consortiumnews.com
- Original Message -----
From: "Harry Pollard"
<<mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Ray Evans
think that a people who had been in that area on > >many
different occasions would have a sense of how much of a possibility >
>for success GWB's pipe dream about Democracy in Iraq has. Or is
English > >culture just incapable of seeing other cultures as
grown-ups and viable >
stubbornness become a liability in dealing with the real
world?Especially if we do not have a genius or scholar for a President
dealing with these sleazy world professionals at Realpolitik?
What do you think Harry?
REH
- Original Message -
From: "Harry Pollard"
<
at do you think Harry?
REH
----- Original Message -
From: "Harry Pollard"
<<mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Keith Hudson" <<mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: <<mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>[EMAIL PROTECTED]&g
;Keith Hudson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Sunday, March 16, 2003 5:34 PM
Subject: Re: It's the testosterone (was Re:
[Futurework] Powerful stuff!
> Keith,> > One of the best programs on American
television is "This Week" on ABC in &
rry Pollard
> Sent: Sun, March 16, 2003 7:40 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: RE: It's the testosterone (was Re: [Futurework] Powerful stuff!
>
>
> Lawry,
>
> I didn't see the articles you mention. His remark about it led me to the
> bit
ocent bystanders.
Cheers,
Lawry
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Harry Pollard
> Sent: Sun, March 16, 2003 5:35 PM
> To: Keith Hudson
> Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: It's the testosterone (was Re: [Futurework]
ight', if the bus, out of control, is
careening toward those innocent bystanders.
Cheers,
Lawry
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Harry Pollard
> Sent: Sun, March 16, 2003 5:35 PM
> To: Keith Hudson
> Cc: [EMAIL PROT
Keith,
One of the best programs on American television is "This Week" on ABC in
the Sunday morning television ghetto - when no-one is watching. However, it
is good enough to have achieved a sizable audience over several decades.
This morning we heard about 20 minutes of Colin Powell answering s
Keith -- I missed the debate you refer to. Can you comment on how Perls
handled himself? Energy and body language?
Thanks,
L
> However, the UK ambassador to the UN between 1986 and 1998, while arguing
> with Perle yesterday on ITV, said that he thought that the UN could be
> either strengthened
effectively disarmed.
Regards,
Gail
Gail Stewart
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
- Original Message -
From: "Keith Hudson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "G. Stewart" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Sunday, March 16, 2003 3:27 PM
Subject: Re: It's the testos
Hi Gail,
You've hit upon what must inevitably happen, either within the UN or a
successor organisation. It must have a Security Council that is independent
of nation-states and has the resources to carry out effective action as
soon as it is decided that a nation-state is dangerous to others.
How
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of G. Stewart
> Sent: Sun, March 16, 2003 7:46 AM
> To: Keith Hudson
> Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: It's the testosterone (was Re: [Futurework] Powerful stuff!
>
>
> Keith,
>
> What a nice set-up you've provided
their decline.
Ed Weick
- Original Message -
From: "G. Stewart" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Keith Hudson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Sunday, March 16, 2003 7:45 AM
Subject: Re: It's the testosterone (was Re: [Futurework] Powerful s
Keith,
What a nice set-up you've provided for a gentle proposal by
a woman! Thanks!
Gail
You wrote:
From: "Keith Hudson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Harry Pollard" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Sunday, March 16, 2003 2:00 AM
Subject: It's the testosterone (was Re: [Futurework]
22 matches
Mail list logo
