Re: Prop Rep in New Zealand

1999-01-16 Thread peter stoyko
Greetings ... For those interested in the issue of proportional representation and electoral reform, there was a recent issue of Policy Options devoted to the subject. I remain skeptical about the benefits of such a system. I have several reasons for thinking this way. First, I think that

Intellect. Prop., Biotech., Globalisation

1999-01-16 Thread Steve Kurtz
Greetings, The article below pertains to COMMONS beyond traditional usage. It also uses a broad notion of "externalities". There is as much economics as politics involved (IMO), although it is written as a piece on democracy. I don't agree with everything in it, particularly the statement about c

Re: Prop Rep in New Zealand

1999-01-16 Thread Colin Stark
Forwarded with permission from Paul Isaacs <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> *** On 14-Jan-99, Colin Stark wrote: { snip } >1Would you rather have dictatorship, or "indecisiveness" >2If three parties have, say, 42%, 35%, and 23% of the popular vote (or >make up your own numbers), which is more f

Re: Prop Rep in New Zealand

1999-01-16 Thread Durant
> >1Would you rather have dictatorship, or "indecisiveness" > I rather won't have dictatorship, nothing guaranties that a "firm" decision is the right decision. > >2If three parties have, say, 42%, 35%, and 23% of the popular vote (or > >make up your own numbers), which is more fair: > the po

FW Canada at the WTO - media are mum! (fwd)

1999-01-16 Thread S. Lerner
>Date: Wed, 17 Nov 1999 16:02:46 -0500 >From: Eric Fawcett <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >To: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], >[EMAIL PROTECTED] >Subject: sfp-89: Canada at the WTO - media are mum! >MIME-Version: 1.0 >X-MIME-Autoconverted: from QUOTED-PRINTABLE to 8bit by >helios.physics.utoro

FW Shaping the Network Society (Conference Announcement) -- Fwd

1999-01-16 Thread S. Lerner
>To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >Subject: Shaping the Network Society (Conference Announcement) -- Fwd >Date: Thu, 18 Nov 1999 06:45:53 -0800 >Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >X-Loop: 70438 > >> > --- >> > Please distribute widely

The 'Privatisation of Knowledge' agenda (Was Re: Bell Labs Predictions for 2025)

1999-01-16 Thread john courtneidge
Dear Friends all, 1) Thanks to Michael G for this posting 2) Its contents are of maximal importance for our 21st Century. * If * these developments are for the benefit of all (the Commonweal) then we might all be celebrating. However: The 'Privatisation of Knowledge' agenda is *the* on

RE: The 'Privatisation of Knowledge' agenda (Was Re: Bell Labs Predictions for 2025)

1999-01-16 Thread Carol Gigliotti
John's comments echo my thoughts on The Bell Lab predictions. And why would this all be a "good" thing? And what then happens to this skin? These skins? Carol Gigliotti, Ph.D. Associate Professor Faculty, Interactive Arts Technical University of British Columbia ( TechBC) Suite 301-10334 15

RE: The 'Privatisation of Knowledge' agenda (Was Re: Bell Labs Predictions for 2025)

1999-01-16 Thread Maria Lantin
Here is an article someone sent to me a while ago about this very subject... M! --- > THE VOLUNTARY COMPLEXITY MOVEMENT Langdon Winner ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) TECH KNOWLEDGE REVUE

FW: 6th century hactivist

1999-01-16 Thread Michael Gurstein
-Original Message- From: Geneva J. Anderson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, November 17, 1999 11:51 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: 6th century hactivist >trial and ended with Dermitt's famous verdict: "To every cow it's calf, to >every book it's copy." > >(Does a biol