On 24 February 2010 22:50, David Chanters david.chant...@googlemail.com wrote:
On 23 February 2010 00:16, des...@verizon.net wrote:
Look at the TODO file in the source tree.
i did this, and have some questions:
- whats the update with the fvwm-convert2.6 script?
Functional, as far as I
On 23 February 2010 00:16, des...@verizon.net wrote:
Look at the TODO file in the source tree.
i did this, and have some questions:
- whats the update with the fvwm-convert2.6 script?
- according to the TODO file, the only thing remaining is this script?
whats outstanding with the convert2.6
On 23 February 2010 11:08, Thomas Adam tho...@xteddy.org wrote:
Ah, I really don't think I can say that I've done much -- I am not
sure what you'd get out of me personally from some sort of interview,
so I'll politely decline. :)
that is disappointing as i recall reading things from you on the
On 23 February 2010 00:16, des...@verizon.net wrote:
Submit patches.
Er, ok. i will try
- what's the roadmap for fvwm's future?
- when will fvwm 2.6 be released?
Is there a document to describe this?
Look at the TODO file in the source tree.
i saw this, but is it accurate for the current
Hi all
I've noticed a lot of activity with fvwm lately, and was wondering:
- is there a way of improving documentation?
- what's the roadmap for fvwm's future?
- when will fvwm 2.6 be released?
Is there a document to describe this?
Also, i would like to offer the chance to interview some of
