Re: FVWM: next stable release? (dont shoot!)

2010-06-20 Thread Michael Treibton
On 13 June 2010 21:54, Thomas Adam tho...@xteddy.org wrote: If you don't see a commit from me by Wednesday, shout at me and I'll do something about it. But please do remind me. did you manage this? M. Treibton

Re: FVWM: next stable release? (dont shoot!)

2010-06-20 Thread Thomas Adam
On Sun, Jun 20, 2010 at 12:33:41PM +0100, Michael Treibton wrote: On 13 June 2010 21:54, Thomas Adam tho...@xteddy.org wrote: If you don't see a commit from me by Wednesday, shout at me and I'll do something about it. But please do remind me. did you manage this? Crap. No. Remind me

Re: FVWM: next stable release? (dont shoot!)

2010-06-14 Thread Thomas Adam
On Sun, Jun 13, 2010 at 09:58:56PM -0400, des...@verizon.net wrote: Thomas Adam tho...@xteddy.org writes: 2. Perhaps more importantly, we have a number of users who compile FVWM up themselves, or we have environments where FVWM is deployed in rather interesting circumstances (perhaps

Re: FVWM: next stable release? (dont shoot!)

2010-06-13 Thread Thomas Adam
On Sun, Jun 13, 2010 at 03:16:39PM +0100, Michael Treibton wrote: hi! On 13 June 2010 10:12, Thomas Adam tho...@xteddy.org wrote: If you or *anyone* else wanted to actually help, by all means look at writing more purify tests -- that alone would likely throw up some interesting bugs if