Re: FVWM: again (semi-transparent) pseudo-cursors

2009-09-04 Thread Thomas Adam
2009/9/4 Lucio Chiappetti lu...@lambrate.inaf.it: Let me rephrase my request of 2 Sep 2009. Maybe this could be an fvwm-compliant solution to my need (repeated at bottom). Is there an fvwm way by which I can :  - associate to an application (which could be a do-nothing application    e.g.

Re: FVWM: again (semi-transparent) pseudo-cursors

2009-09-04 Thread Lucio Chiappetti
On Fri, 4 Sep 2009, Thomas Adam wrote: 2009/9/4 Lucio Chiappetti lu...@lambrate.inaf.it:  - associate to an application (which could be a do-nothing application    e.g. an xterm with a special title never opened, always iconized)    an icon which is partially transparent (say a large red

Re: FVWM: again (semi-transparent) pseudo-cursors

2009-09-04 Thread Jonathan Kotta
On Fri, Sep 4, 2009 at 12:23 PM, Thomas Adamthomas.ada...@gmail.com wrote: 2009/9/4 Lucio Chiappetti lu...@lambrate.inaf.it: However until I do not click again to terminate the move, any keyboard action (e.g. to advance slides) is inhibited. Obviously -- the pointer is grabbed at the point

Re: FVWM: [OT] (semi-transparent) cursors

2009-09-04 Thread Viktor Griph
2009/9/2 Lucio Chiappetti lu...@lambrate.inaf.it: Not strictly an fvwm question, but there are surely lot of X competent persons on this mailing list, so please forgive (and eventually redirect me to more appropriate places). Is there a way to define (or emulate via another x application ?)

Re: Firefox annoyances, once more

2009-09-04 Thread Thomas Adam
2009/8/28 Viktor Griph gr...@dd.chalmers.se: Just fixing the issue is simple, but doing it right requires some though. Any input on how to best handle this is welcome. I'll implement a fix for the current issue, but I don't want the discussion to end with that. So I'm finally catching up.