Re: FVWM: fvwm3? [on Wayland]

2024-02-08 Thread Stuart Longland
On 8/2/24 11:55, Chris Bennett wrote: How many here have grey beards? I hope "somebody" (without grey beard but with a lot of time) makes a sane X11 emulation layer. On the other hand, OpenBSD is alive and has it's own heavily patched Xorg called Xenocara and they most likely won't let that

Re: FVWM: fvwm3?

2024-02-08 Thread Stuart Longland
On 8/2/24 13:51, hw wrote: It has become a very limited option years ago and is basically obsolete. Just try to run, for example, firefox on a remote host via X11 forwarding. I suspect that anything that might use acceleration powers of a graphics card doesn't work, and that kinda leaves only

Re: FVWM: fvwm3?

2024-02-08 Thread Thomas Adam
On Thu, Feb 08, 2024 at 05:50:44AM +0100, hw wrote: > I still don't see why it shouldn't be possible. I never expected a > port, and I understand that the architectures of X11 and Wayland are > very different. Yet why shouldn't it be possible to create a > compositor that provides the

Re: FVWM: fvwm3?

2024-02-08 Thread mark_at_yahoo
On 2/7/24 20:09, hw wrote: On Sat, 2024-02-03 at 13:53 +0100, Lucio Chiappetti wrote: I hope to be able to go on with Xorg until I live. Or use wayland and start living now :) Living in the past seldwhen is a good idea. Except when the past is better: More capable, complete, and highly