to sources.list. Note that these aren't all that up-to-date; I think
the version there is still 2.5.6.
Nevertheless interesting ;-)
I guess the maintainer decided to put it in a separate apt-repository
instead of in the main unstable repository.
thanks,
Remko
--
Visit the official FVWM web
debian unstable is called unstable because it's not stable yet, not
because it includes unstable (development) versions of apps. Generally
debian unstable includes latest stable versions of apps (or at least
that's the goal, as far as I can say).
That's correct. Although that doesn't
%% Remko Troncon [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
debian unstable is called unstable because it's not stable yet, not
because it includes unstable (development) versions of apps. Generally
debian unstable includes latest stable versions of apps (or at least
that's the goal, as far as I
Remko Troncon wrote:
debian unstable is called unstable because it's not stable yet, not
because it includes unstable (development) versions of apps. Generally
debian unstable includes latest stable versions of apps (or at least
that's the goal, as far as I can say).
That's correct.
* Sep 04 17:36 stu [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Hi everyone
Hi, there!
Possibly this is the wrong forum for this question, but I'll risk
asking it here first. Is there any reason why Debian unstable only
provides fvwm 2.4.16, and not fvwm 2.5.7?
My guess is a lazy/inactive package maintainer. Mail
On 04 Sep 2003 19:36:44 +0200, stu wrote:
Possibly this is the wrong forum for this question, but I'll risk asking
it here first. Is there any reason why Debian unstable only provides
fvwm 2.4.16, and not fvwm 2.5.7?
Meantime, you may try these deb snapshots from a month ago, newer than
stu wrote:
Hi everyone
Possibly this is the wrong forum for this question, but I'll risk asking
it here first. Is there any reason why Debian unstable only provides
fvwm 2.4.16, and not fvwm 2.5.7?
debian unstable is called unstable because it's not stable yet, not
because it includes
Am 17:25 2003-06-03 +0200 hat Fernando Poza geschrieben:
What sounds weird to me, is that having available a debian package for
fvwm 2.4.6-2, which means that somebody has already made the effort, the
work has been stoped.
So, it looks like fvwm package has become orphaned, or whatever way they
Hello Fernando,
Am 15:27 2003-06-03 +0200 hat Fernando Poza geschrieben:
Hi there!
I'm new in the list, but not in fvwm. I'm running debian in my box, and
I wanted to update to the last stable fvwm version. But the thing is
that it seems there is no debian package with fvwm.(fvwm*.deb) in
* Jun 11 18:10 Michelle Konzack [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
[...]
Not right, because there are only security updates in Debian
and not new Versions...
Not quite true either. That depends on if you are using stable (woody),
testing (sarge) or unstable (sid).
--
Johan Svedberg, [EMAIL PROTECTED],
On 03 Jun 2003 15:27:18 +0200, Fernando Poza wrote:
I'm new in the list, but not in fvwm. I'm running debian in my box, and
I wanted to update to the last stable fvwm version. But the thing is
that it seems there is no debian package with fvwm.(fvwm*.deb) in
fvwm.org.
Am I right?, or I'm
* Jun 03 16:18 Mikhael Goikhman [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
On 03 Jun 2003 15:27:18 +0200, Fernando Poza wrote:
I'm new in the list, but not in fvwm. I'm running debian in my box,
and I wanted to update to the last stable fvwm version. But the
thing is that it seems there is no debian package with
On 03 Jun 2003 16:40:10 +0200, Johan Svedberg wrote:
* Jun 03 16:18 Mikhael Goikhman [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
On 03 Jun 2003 15:27:18 +0200, Fernando Poza wrote:
I'm new in the list, but not in fvwm. I'm running debian in my box,
and I wanted to update to the last stable fvwm version. But
On Tue, Jun 03, 2003 at 05:25:26PM +0200, Fernando Poza wrote:
What sounds weird to me, is that having available a debian package for
fvwm 2.4.6-2, which means that somebody has already made the effort, the
work has been stoped.
Here in testing I have 2.4.15-2
Klaus
So, it looks like
Fernando Poza wrote:
Hi there!
I'm new in the list, but not in fvwm. I'm running debian in my box, and
I wanted to update to the last stable fvwm version. But the thing is
that it seems there is no debian package with fvwm.(fvwm*.deb) in
fvwm.org.
Am I right?, or I'm just not looked for
On 03 Jun 2003 17:25:26 +0200, Fernando Poza wrote:
What sounds weird to me, is that having available a debian package for
fvwm 2.4.6-2, which means that somebody has already made the effort, the
work has been stoped.
So, it looks like fvwm package has become orphaned, or whatever way
16 matches
Mail list logo