Re: GetNextSimpleOption is broken

2014-09-03 Thread Thomas Adam
On Tue, Sep 02, 2014 at 11:14:11PM +0100, Dominik Vogt wrote: On Tue, Sep 02, 2014 at 11:09:49PM +0100, Thomas Adam wrote: On 2 September 2014 23:04, Dominik Vogt dominik.v...@gmx.de wrote: Can you write the missing sub-rule for the Test command (the one that has to do with infostore)?

Re: GetNextSimpleOption is broken

2014-09-03 Thread Dominik Vogt
On Wed, Sep 03, 2014 at 10:39:39PM +0100, Thomas Adam wrote: On Tue, Sep 02, 2014 at 11:14:11PM +0100, Dominik Vogt wrote: On Tue, Sep 02, 2014 at 11:09:49PM +0100, Thomas Adam wrote: On 2 September 2014 23:04, Dominik Vogt dominik.v...@gmx.de wrote: Can you write the missing sub-rule

Re: GetNextSimpleOption is broken

2014-09-02 Thread Dan Espen
Dominik Vogt dominik.v...@gmx.de writes: Just found this comment in CMD_Test: /* * unfortunately, GetNextSimpleOption is * * broken, does not accept quoted empty */ Actually, GetNextSimpleOption() is _not_ broken. The parsing library guarantees never

Re: GetNextSimpleOption is broken

2014-09-02 Thread Thomas Adam
On Tue, Sep 02, 2014 at 10:55:43PM +0100, Dominik Vogt wrote: By the way, does anybody know what this infostore stuff is about? https://www.mail-archive.com/fvwm-workers@fvwm.org/msg02706.html -- Thomas Adam -- Deep in my heart I wish I was wrong. But deep in my heart I know I am not. --

Re: GetNextSimpleOption is broken

2014-09-02 Thread Dominik Vogt
On Tue, Sep 02, 2014 at 11:00:13PM +0100, Thomas Adam wrote: On Tue, Sep 02, 2014 at 10:55:43PM +0100, Dominik Vogt wrote: By the way, does anybody know what this infostore stuff is about? https://www.mail-archive.com/fvwm-workers@fvwm.org/msg02706.html Thenks. Can you write the missing

Re: GetNextSimpleOption is broken

2014-09-02 Thread Dan Espen
Dominik Vogt dominik.v...@gmx.de writes: On Tue, Sep 02, 2014 at 05:48:05PM -0400, Dan Espen wrote: Dominik Vogt dominik.v...@gmx.de writes: Just found this comment in CMD_Test: /* * unfortunately, GetNextSimpleOption is * * broken, does not accept quoted empty

Re: GetNextSimpleOption is broken

2014-09-02 Thread Dominik Vogt
On Tue, Sep 02, 2014 at 06:07:44PM -0400, Dan Espen wrote: Dominik Vogt dominik.v...@gmx.de writes: By the way, does anybody know what this infostore stuff is about? Thomas does, but just in case he doesn't find his own email...

Re: GetNextSimpleOption is broken

2014-09-02 Thread Dominik Vogt
On Tue, Sep 02, 2014 at 11:09:49PM +0100, Thomas Adam wrote: On 2 September 2014 23:04, Dominik Vogt dominik.v...@gmx.de wrote: Can you write the missing sub-rule for the Test command (the one that has to do with infostore)? Will do in the next half-hour or so. Great. This is the last

Re: GetNextSimpleOption is broken

2014-09-02 Thread Thomas Adam
On Tue, Sep 02, 2014 at 11:11:56PM +0100, Dominik Vogt wrote: On Tue, Sep 02, 2014 at 06:07:44PM -0400, Dan Espen wrote: Dominik Vogt dominik.v...@gmx.de writes: By the way, does anybody know what this infostore stuff is about? Thomas does, but just in case he doesn't find his own

Re: GetNextSimpleOption is broken

2014-09-02 Thread Dan Espen
Dominik Vogt dominik.v...@gmx.de writes: On Tue, Sep 02, 2014 at 06:07:44PM -0400, Dan Espen wrote: Dominik Vogt dominik.v...@gmx.de writes: By the way, does anybody know what this infostore stuff is about? Thomas does, but just in case he doesn't find his own email...

Re: GetNextSimpleOption is broken

2014-09-02 Thread Dan Espen
Thomas Adam tho...@fvwm.org writes: On Tue, Sep 02, 2014 at 11:11:56PM +0100, Dominik Vogt wrote: On Tue, Sep 02, 2014 at 06:07:44PM -0400, Dan Espen wrote: Dominik Vogt dominik.v...@gmx.de writes: By the way, does anybody know what this infostore stuff is about? Thomas does, but

Re: GetNextSimpleOption is broken

2014-09-02 Thread Dominik Vogt
On Tue, Sep 02, 2014 at 11:15:44PM +0100, Thomas Adam wrote: On Tue, Sep 02, 2014 at 11:11:56PM +0100, Dominik Vogt wrote: On Tue, Sep 02, 2014 at 06:07:44PM -0400, Dan Espen wrote: Dominik Vogt dominik.v...@gmx.de writes: By the way, does anybody know what this infostore stuff is

Re: GetNextSimpleOption is broken

2014-09-02 Thread Dominik Vogt
On Tue, Sep 02, 2014 at 06:18:14PM -0400, Dan Espen wrote: Dominik Vogt dominik.v...@gmx.de writes: On Tue, Sep 02, 2014 at 06:07:44PM -0400, Dan Espen wrote: Dominik Vogt dominik.v...@gmx.de writes: By the way, does anybody know what this infostore stuff is about? Thomas does,

Re: GetNextSimpleOption is broken

2014-09-02 Thread Dominik Vogt
On Tue, Sep 02, 2014 at 06:22:28PM -0400, Dan Espen wrote: I don't mind. But I certainly _dislike_ the ridiculous tokens we have now in terms of w.foo, i.foo, etc., etc. I'd much rather we deferred that part until much later on, as I've a few notes regarding expansion versus information

Re: GetNextSimpleOption is broken

2014-09-02 Thread Thomas Adam
On Tue, Sep 02, 2014 at 11:14:11PM +0100, Dominik Vogt wrote: Great. This is the last missing piece of the conditional commands. I'm eager to get over with the basic parsing description draft so I can try some practical things. :-) Done. Heh, I've sneakily been starting a few things, but