Re: Deprecation: Let's talk once more about removing $STUFF...

On Thu, May 19, 2016 at 08:27:54PM +0200, Stefan Blachmann wrote: > Personally I'd rather prefer to keep FvwmWinList as I use it myself > and am not really eager spend time to modify my config, as I use it as > a sort of life saver rarely only when I lost track where a particular > window is. I'm

Re: Deprecation: Let's talk once more about removing $STUFF...

On Thu, May 19, 2016 at 11:57:17AM -0600, Jaimos Skriletz wrote: > ​I do agree that FvwmTaskBar should be deprecated and FvwmIconMan should be > used instead, but my experience is FvwmIconMan was not easy to create a > config that behaved like the simple FvwmTaskBar, and I still think many are >

Re: Deprecation: Let's talk once more about removing $STUFF...

On Thu, May 19, 2016 at 01:07:26PM -0400, Dan Espen wrote: > I'm not using anything else you mentioned, so no problem. > But I'm unsure what problem some of them cause just hanging around. They're not used, and are bit-rotting. Almost all of the Fvwm modules I've listed here fall into the

Re: Deprecation: Let's talk once more about removing $STUFF...

In addition to what Jaimos said, at least in my impression FvwmWinList is still being used much. I saw it in quite a few out-of-the-box fvwm configs supplied by various linux and other unixoid OS distros. So I guess dropping it could cause some work for maintainers etc. Thus I think Jaimos' idea

Re: Deprecation: Let's talk once more about removing $STUFF...

On Thu, May 19, 2016 at 11:07 AM, Dan Espen wrote: > Just had an opportunity to look at Fvwm.Org, it looks pretty nice. > I thought we were going to retain the themeing, but I don't see it. > Not a real problem. > ​ > ​Being a static site and only using html and javascript

Re: Deprecation: Let's talk once more about removing $STUFF...

On Thu, May 19, 2016 at 9:18 AM, Thomas Adam wrote: > > * FvwmTaskBar -- Use FvwmIconMan. > > ​I do agree that FvwmTaskBar should be deprecated and FvwmIconMan should be used instead, but my experience is FvwmIconMan was not easy to create a config that behaved like the simple

Re: Deprecation: Let's talk once more about removing $STUFF...

Thomas Adam writes: > Hey all, > > The last time this came up for conversation [0] things were far from ideal. I > want to have another conversation about this to see whether it's possible to > state the case why some modules in FVWM should be removed. > > As I understand it,

[fvwmorg/fvwm] 168821: Remove no longer used modules

Branch: refs/heads/ta/deprecate Home: https://github.com/fvwmorg/fvwm Commit: 168821c548f2745132601db16a5c153d94ae0e47 https://github.com/fvwmorg/fvwm/commit/168821c548f2745132601db16a5c153d94ae0e47 Author: Thomas Adam Date: 2016-05-19 (Thu, 19 May 2016)

[fvwmorg/fvwm] 653877: Remove no longer used modules

Branch: refs/heads/ta/deprecate Home: https://github.com/fvwmorg/fvwm Commit: 6538d7acde5f7836fe63fa7aef3aab1beb80 https://github.com/fvwmorg/fvwm/commit/6538d7acde5f7836fe63fa7aef3aab1beb80 Author: Thomas Adam Date: 2016-05-19 (Thu, 19 May 2016)