Re: Problem on Makefiles

2006-05-31 Thread Parv
Could you please not post your reply on top of the previous post? in message [EMAIL PROTECTED], wrote marcel bertonzzin thusly... You're right, I'm not using ports, because they just port stable releases. Ports system may not have fvwm right out of fvwm CVS but does have the development

Problem on Makefiles

2006-05-29 Thread marcel bertonzzin
Well, i tried to compile FVWM 2.5.16 on my FreeBSD 6.1-RC and I got some problems with ld(1) because of these Makefiles: fvwm-2.5.16/modules/FvwmAnimate/Makefile fvwm-2.5.16/modules/FvwmBanner/Makefile fvwm-2.5.16/modules/FvwmWharf/Makefile fvwm-2.5.16/bin/Makefile fvwm-2.5.16/Makefile Because

Re: Problem on Makefiles

2006-05-29 Thread Mikhael Goikhman
On 28 May 2006 15:20:47 -0300, marcel bertonzzin wrote: Because of the png_LIBS variable, that is set to: -lpng -lz but should be: -L/usr/local/bin -lpng -lz What is the location of libpng.so or/and libpng.a on your system? Do you say that /usr/local/bin? Regards, Mikhael.

Re: Problem on Makefiles

2006-05-29 Thread marcel bertonzzin
libpng.so, libpng.a and libpng.so.5 are at /usr/local/lib On 5/29/06, Mikhael Goikhman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On 28 May 2006 15:20:47 -0300, marcel bertonzzin wrote: Because of the png_LIBS variable, that is set to: -lpng -lz but should be: -L/usr/local/bin -lpng -lz What is the

Re: Problem on Makefiles

2006-05-29 Thread Parv
in message [EMAIL PROTECTED], wrote marcel bertonzzin thusly... Well, i tried to compile FVWM 2.5.16 on my FreeBSD 6.1-RC and I got some problems with ld(1) because of these Makefiles: fvwm-2.5.16/modules/FvwmAnimate/Makefile fvwm-2.5.16/modules/FvwmBanner/Makefile