On 18 Dec 2002 18:57:32 -0800, Nadim Shaikli wrote:
With regard to your 'naskhi' font - if it contains the required
Form-B glyphs (U+FE70 - U+FEFF), then the following ought to work,
Style Arabic Font *-naskhi-medium-*-iso8859-6/iso10646-1
If it is iso8859-6 font (not
--- Mikhael Goikhman wrote:
On 18 Dec 2002 18:57:32 -0800, Nadim Shaikli wrote:
iso8859-6 is a subset of iso10646-1 -- again, iso8859-6 alone is
simply not usable; its visually incorrect without shaping and one
is not able to shape sans Form-B glyphs (there are a plethora of
posts
--- Mikhael Goikhman migo homemail com wrote:
On 12 Dec 2002 09:53:48 -0800, Nadim Shaikli wrote:
Mikhael/Olivier, I had sent an email with regards to the attached
patch to FBidiJoin.c to this list (as well as in private) so as
to include the the required changes/fixes to the
On 18 Dec 2002 15:11:44 -0800, Nadim Shaikli wrote:
--- Mikhael Goikhman migo homemail com wrote:
I tested the results and seems to work ok with unicode and iso8859-8.
But I can't see iso8859-6 in titles now. I have a lot of iso8859-6
fonts and I was able to see it in the past. I run:
--- Mikhael Goikhman migo homemail com wrote:
On 18 Dec 2002 15:11:44 -0800, Nadim Shaikli wrote:
Keep in mind that iso8859-6 doesn't spell out proper Arabic visual
support since it doesn't include all the shaped/joined glyphs and
as such you should always revert to an 10646-1 font
On 12 Dec 2002 09:53:48 -0800, Nadim Shaikli wrote:
Mikhael/Olivier, I had sent an email with regards to the attached
patch to FBidiJoin.c to this list (as well as in private) so as
to include the the required changes/fixes to the shaping/joining
file. I'm not sure if my email was received
Mikhael/Olivier, I had sent an email with regards to the attached
patch to FBidiJoin.c to this list (as well as in private) so as
to include the the required changes/fixes to the shaping/joining
file. I'm not sure if my email was received as I didn't get any
responses nor did I see the changes
--- Olivier Chapuis wrote:
[snip snip]
So we need the function:
USC4UTF8Length(Char32 *str): return the length of an UCS-4 string
considered as an UTF-8 string
and also the following function will be useful (to allocate
logical_unicode_str at exact
On 01 Dec 2002 01:04:09 +0100, Olivier Chapuis wrote:
On Sun, Nov 24, 2002 at 12:49:35PM -0800, Nadim Shaikli wrote:
--- Ethan Blanton wrote:
Nadim Shaikli spake unto us the following wisdom:
Ideally it would be wonderful to simply run fvwm and this code
under a debugger and single
On 01 Dec 2002 12:50:38 +, Mikhael Goikhman wrote:
On 01 Dec 2002 01:04:09 +0100, Olivier Chapuis wrote:
Ok, I've found the problem. FBidiConvert assume that the in string
and the out string have the same length. This is the case until you
joint. With joint what may happen is:
On Sun, Nov 24, 2002 at 12:49:35PM -0800, Nadim Shaikli wrote:
--- Ethan Blanton wrote:
Nadim Shaikli spake unto us the following wisdom:
Ideally it would be wonderful to simply run fvwm and this code
under a debugger and single step around for a better feel for
what is causing it to
On Sun, Nov 24, 2002 at 12:49:35PM -0800, Nadim Shaikli wrote:
--- Ethan Blanton wrote:
Nadim Shaikli spake unto us the following wisdom:
I do have a possible idea of what is happening. Mikhael/Olivier, this
might make sense to you guys more than others :-) so let me know if you
want
--- Ethan Blanton wrote:
Nadim Shaikli spake unto us the following wisdom:
Ideally it would be wonderful to simply run fvwm and this code
under a debugger and single step around for a better feel for
what is causing it to go into the weeds.
How about running your debugger/fvwm in a
Mikhael Goikhman wrote:
On Tue, Nov 12, 2002 at 02:44:15PM -0800, Nadim Shaikli wrote:
Here is my dilemma, I'm including a patch which works on the
simple strings (1, 2 words in titles), but seems to fail on
more complex ones without any indicators to why. I'm unable
to reproduce those
--- Mikhael Goikhman wrote:
On 18 Nov 2002 12:09:16 -0800, Nadim Shaikli wrote:
Mikhael/Olivier, were you able to reproduce the problem ? In other
words, is it core-dumping for you as well ? I'm very curious and
anxious to know what it was/is :-)
Yes, it more or less core dumps on
Nadim Shaikli spake unto us the following wisdom:
Maybe. But I would try to narrow the #if 0 code even more so that there
is still no problem.
That would be interesting to see. Ideally it would be wonderful to
simply run fvwm and this code under a debugger and single step around
for a
On 18 Nov 2002 14:54:13 -0800, Nadim Shaikli wrote:
--- Mikhael Goikhman wrote:
On 18 Nov 2002 13:20:54 -0800, Nadim Shaikli wrote:
Luckily fribidi (fribidi.sf.net) is rather easy to download and
compile :-) BTW, the patch was against 0.10.4 (current release
version).
You
On Mon, Nov 18, 2002 at 12:09:16PM -0800, Nadim Shaikli wrote:
Mikhael Goikhman wrote:
On Tue, Nov 12, 2002 at 02:44:15PM -0800, Nadim Shaikli wrote:
Here is my dilemma, I'm including a patch which works on the
simple strings (1, 2 words in titles), but seems to fail on
more complex
On 15 Nov 2002 10:34:57 +0100, Olivier Chapuis wrote:
On Tue, Nov 12, 2002 at 02:44:15PM -0800, Nadim Shaikli wrote:
Hi Guys, sorry to pick on the both of you, but since you championed
the inclusion of Bidi (fribidi) into fvwm I thought I'd approach ya
first.
As promised (awhile
19 matches
Mail list logo
