On Wed, Mar 01, 2017 at 03:10:48PM -0500, Chris Siebenmann wrote:
> > > If you click on the link, it's supposed to print something like:
> > >
> > > link
> > > http://gtk.org
> > > In a configuration with a Mouse 1 binding that includes the Window
> > > context (so W or A), the link can't be
> > If you click on the link, it's supposed to print something like:
> >
> > link
> > http://gtk.org
> > In a configuration with a Mouse 1 binding that includes the Window
> > context (so W or A), the link can't be activated by clicking mouse-1
> > and link.py prints nothing. You can
On Wed, Mar 01, 2017 at 08:36:58PM +0100, Dominik Vogt wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 01, 2017 at 01:36:52PM -0500, Chris Siebenmann wrote:
> > (Let me know if you want more detail somewhere here and I can rerun
> > my gdb tracing and/or add printfs appropriately.)
> >
> > Fortunately there is a simple
On Wed, Mar 01, 2017 at 08:45:36PM +0100, Dominik Vogt wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 01, 2017 at 08:36:58PM +0100, Dominik Vogt wrote:
> > On Wed, Mar 01, 2017 at 01:36:52PM -0500, Chris Siebenmann wrote:
> > > (Let me know if you want more detail somewhere here and I can rerun
> > > my gdb tracing and/or
On Wed, Mar 01, 2017 at 01:36:52PM -0500, Chris Siebenmann wrote:
> (Let me know if you want more detail somewhere here and I can rerun
> my gdb tracing and/or add printfs appropriately.)
>
> Fortunately there is a simple reproduction program mentioned in the
> Debian bug,
> > Unless I have a simple test application and a configuration
> > that exhibits that behaviour I cannot do much about it.
> > Would you be able to fvwm in Xnest and debug through
> > events.c:__handle_bpress_on_managed() to see what actually happens?
>
> By the way, have you tried to get the
> The only other reason fvwm grabs a button is for focus handling in
> focus.c:__focus_grab_one_button(). The only possible reason I
> could think of is that the application does not accept focus so
> that grab never gets removed. Have you tried
>
> Style * Lenience
>
> as Dan suggested?
>
On Wed, Mar 01, 2017 at 07:02:55PM +0100, Dominik Vogt wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 01, 2017 at 09:43:58AM -0500, Chris Siebenmann wrote:
> > > On Tue, Feb 28, 2017 at 08:42:38PM -0500, Chris Siebenmann wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > > If I comment out all Mouse 0 and 1 bindings from my fvwmrc-2.5
> > > > > >
On Wed, Mar 01, 2017 at 09:43:58AM -0500, Chris Siebenmann wrote:
> > On Tue, Feb 28, 2017 at 08:42:38PM -0500, Chris Siebenmann wrote:
> > >
> > > > > If I comment out all Mouse 0 and 1 bindings from my fvwmrc-2.5
> > > > > file (from the URL) *except* either:
> > > > >
> > > > > Mouse
> > > > then I see the extra LeaveNotify / EnterNotify / KeymapNotify sequence
> > > > in xev
>
> Forget about these; that's just how X works.
I dusted off old memories about the patches that I'm carrying in my
home fvwm binary and not my work one, and I think that this has come
up before and
> On Tue, Feb 28, 2017 at 08:42:38PM -0500, Chris Siebenmann wrote:
> >
> > > > If I comment out all Mouse 0 and 1 bindings from my fvwmrc-2.5
> > > > file (from the URL) *except* either:
> > > >
> > > > Mouse 1 A MS Iconify
> > > > or
> > > >
On Tue, Feb 28, 2017 at 08:42:38PM -0500, Chris Siebenmann wrote:
>
> > > If I comment out all Mouse 0 and 1 bindings from my fvwmrc-2.5
> > > file (from the URL) *except* either:
> > >
> > > Mouse 1 A MS Iconify
> > > or
> > > Mouse 1 A
> >> When you click a mouse it should generate 2 X11 events:
> >>
> >> ButtonPress
> >> ButtonRelease
> >
> > I've just used xev to confirm that I see ButtonPress and ButtonRelease
> > events. However, what I have discovered is that I see additional events
> > with my FVWM configuration.
Chris Siebenmann writes:
>> Chris Siebenmann writes:
>>
>> > Corebird is a Linux/GTK Twitter client:
>> >https://corebird.baedert.org/
>> >
>> > In attempting to use the current version on Fedora 25, I have uncovered
>> > a weird oddity where I
14 matches
Mail list logo