From: JOHN.E.ABRAHAM [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Apple should have produced their own emulator or taken over the rights to
REAL PC and developed it to integrate it with any further issues of the
Mac's OS.
I agree 100%
While it is always difficult for an OS developer when to (and not to)
tread into the
From: Nolen Scaife [EMAIL PROTECTED]
And for the Apple should lower their prices argument.
snip
While Apple's prices are quite a bit more expensive than PCs,
What most people are getting wrong here is that they are not
comparing like for like.
I can build three PCs with higher clock speed than I
OK people, that was a very interesting thread but I can't see anymore what
it brings to users of G-based laptops.
Can we move on, please? You can always continue the discussion privately, if
you need to...
Thanks!
-Laurent, G-Books list nanny.
--
From: Illovox Media [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Some bozo wrote me off this thread
snip
Then he said that because he was paying for his daughter's wedding,
Steve Jobs should give him free software designed for his old machines.
snip
Ha ha, that brings me back to all the people who complained that
the
On 11/2/03 11:25 PM, John Acuff [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Does anyone have any idea why I'm getting this message? How does iTunes
figure out what country I'm in? I've spent at least an hour searching
the Knowledge Base with no answers.
Really strange, off-the-wall guess, but: what time zone do
On 11/2/03 11:25 PM, John Acuff [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Does anyone have any idea why I'm getting this message? How does iTunes
figure out what country I'm in? I've spent at least an hour searching
the Knowledge Base with no answers.
The other thing could be something with his ISP. I know there
On Sunday, November 2, 2003, at 03:12 PM, Nolen Scaife wrote:
And for the Apple should lower their prices argument (sorry, I don't
have a snippet for that), I have a few things to say. While Apple's
prices are quite a bit more expensive than PCs
Actually, they aren't.
Configure *similar*
On Monday, November 3, 2003, at 03:44 AM, NIKON'S WORLD wrote:
On Sunday, November 2, 2003, at 11:25 PM, John Acuff wrote:
Has anybody else (in the US) ran into this?
I just installed iTunes 4.1, and when I started iTunes and went to
the Music Store, I got a message saying that the iTunes
On Monday, November 3, 2003, at 08:28 AM, Scott Crick wrote:
On 11/2/03 11:25 PM, John Acuff [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Does anyone have any idea why I'm getting this message? How does
iTunes
figure out what country I'm in? I've spent at least an hour searching
the Knowledge Base with no answers.
Just a quick note...My son downloaded this thing yesterday and we got
this message this am... Any comments as to how it works on a Pismo 400
in Classic? We also got Panther on the Pismo and it rocks!!
Regards,
Mike K
The grammar could be better...what is an air?
Thank you for downloading
Very true. Many people will argue that Apple's hardware is so much
more expensive and then if you seek out a PC with feature parity
[often hard to find] and show them that the margin is very slim, the
argument changes to well I don't need all that stuff.
So in the end it makes them sound to be
Email em, I have had to email the iTunes Music Store support with
questions as have some friends of mine, all of us have received prompt
responses that did answer our questions. Email em and see if they are
slacking or keeping up the good work.
David
On Nov 3, 2003, at 8:40 AM, John Acuff
At 3:12 -0500 on 11/3/03, you (Laurent Daudelin), wrote:
OK people, that was a very interesting thread but I can't see anymore what
it brings to users of G-based laptops.
Can we move on, please? You can always continue the discussion privately, if
you need to...
Thanks Laurent.
--
HTH,
A guy I work with, offered me a lombard 333 Mhz Laaptop for $100-125, is this a good
deal? don't these go for like $800?
-Joe
--
www.kuleinc.com
www.kulehosting.com
www.kulemac.com
www.kulehome.net
Yes, it's a good deal if the laptop fits your needs. They don't go for
quite that much anymore, but still command a few hundred $ on eBay.
On Monday, November 3, 2003, at 11:23 AM, Joe wrote:
A guy I work with, offered me a lombard 333 Mhz Laaptop for $100-125,
is this a good deal? don't
On 11/3/03 1:23 PM, Joe [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
A guy I work with, offered me a lombard 333 Mhz Laaptop for $100-125, is this
a good deal? don't these go for like $800?
It is a very good deal! Let me know if you're going to pass on this offer.
I'll give the guy $150 right away (if the
On 11/3/03 6:53 AM, gianfranco apparently wrote:
I have a lombard 333mhz running sys 9.2.2 but it is having frequent
freezes. Any idea what could be the cause?
I have a similar problem. I found out (with DiskLight) it is related in my
case to the external JAZ SCSI drive. I does not occour in
On Mon, 3 Nov 2003, Wiebe Wilbers wrote:
Thanks. At least I now have an idea of what I'm looking for.
I have a Video Enhancer I bought from JayCar (An electronics shop here in
Australia) for $AU37. Probably around $20-25 US. Works well! No brand name
on it, it is just a generic unit sold by
It has been brought to my attention that some subscribers of this list have
been sending emails back and forth with other subscribers. Although these
were off-list and not directly falling under the list's rules, since they
were sent to other subscribers, I will not tolerate such behavior from
Folks, you need to accept that not everyone will agree with what you're
saying and get over it. No matter how hard you try to enforce your
point,
the other people are free to make their own opinions.
No offense, but you need to accept the limitations of managing a list.
You've no control or
On 11/3/03 3:16 PM, Hamlin Krewson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Folks, you need to accept that not everyone will agree with what you're
saying and get over it. No matter how hard you try to enforce your
point,
the other people are free to make their own opinions.
No offense, but you need to
Laurent, thanks for letting us know that you will not tolerate one
subscriber sending a private email to another, even though by your own
admission these emails are off-list and not directly falling under the
list's rules. I am also grateful that you pointed out how disturbed you
were when you
Maybe I misread him but I got the impression he was talking about
unsolicited e-mail of an offensive nature, not off list e-mail in
general, but if you want to overreact, go ahead, most of the discussion
on these lists is one person overreacting to another.
David
On Nov 3, 2003, at 2:23 PM,
As a list owner myself, I can understand your frustration with
members complaining to you about offlist email. However, I feel your
attempt to control what list members do offlist is going that bit too
far in list administration. What, are we going to all turn into
tattletales now? This sort
I don't see offensive anywhere in his original post. Just e-mails, the
phrase back and forth, which would indicate the exchange was bilateral and
therefore not unsolicited, and the suggestion that sending said emails
privately is improper. I'm guessing you're right, of course. What I was
making
On Nov 3, 2003, at 2:27 PM, David M. Ensteness wrote:
Maybe I misread him but I got the impression he was talking about
unsolicited e-mail of an offensive nature, not off list e-mail in
general, but if you want to overreact, go ahead, most of the
discussion on these lists is one person
Well, my feeling on it is that if there was more of people trying to
hear each other out and less of people nitpicking this would not even
be an issue to bother discussing.
An example would be how often times someone asks for some help trouble
shooting something. The types of responses often
On 11/3/03 3:38 PM, Mitch Hogg [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I don't see offensive anywhere in his original post. Just e-mails, the
phrase back and forth, which would indicate the exchange was bilateral and
therefore not unsolicited, and the suggestion that sending said emails
privately is
So, nobody on this list really care if they start receiving OFFENSIVE
emails? Well, I do care, for a starter and I think it's legitimate from
other subscribers to care if the offender got their email address from
the
list.
Sure it will bother me, but asking you to take care of the problem is
Funny, I didn't see nasty or insulting in the original post either;
maybe you were using a font that my mail client couldn't handle.
All joking aside, I agree with those who've pointed out that a list nanny
can't prevent one listmember from corresponding with another. Now,
forwarding a private
Now that was the most reasonable thing said yet. I second it.
David
On Nov 3, 2003, at 3:02 PM, Thomas Ethen wrote:
I agree with Laurent about using harvested e-mail addresses to send
offensive comments to list members, which is similar to spaming! A
member
complained about receiving off color
I disagree with Hamlin too, mailing addresses are public and free
information, e-mail addresses are not.
David
On Nov 3, 2003, at 3:10 PM, Illovox Media wrote:
on 11/3/03 12:16 PM, Hamlin Krewson at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It's a freedom
that everyone has access to no matter how smart or
On Nov 3, 2003, at 3:02 PM, Thomas Ethen wrote:
I agree with Laurent about using harvested e-mail addresses to send
offensive comments to list members, which is similar to spaming! A
member
complained about receiving off color responses from other list
members, and
they got his e-mail address
Can you please(please, please) have this discussion off-list?
Thank you all
Marc
--
G-Books is sponsored by http://lowendmac.com/ and...
Small Dog Electronicshttp://www.smalldog.com | Refurbished Drives |
-- Check our web site for refurbished PowerBooks | CDRWs on Sale! |
Support
Once you put your address on a publicly accessible list, it became
public information. Anyone that knows your name can google and find the
address you use for this list.
I disagree with Hamlin too, mailing addresses are public and free
information, e-mail addresses are not.
David
--
In a message dated 11/3/2003 4:08:30 PM Eastern Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I agree with Laurent about using harvested e-mail addresses to send
offensive comments to list members, which is similar to spaming!
Hmmm... in RESPONDING to x privately to a comment x made in an open
That was a joke, right?
On 11/3/03 4:18 PM, Marc [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Can you please(please, please) have this discussion off-list?
Thank you all
Marc
--
G-Books is sponsored by http://lowendmac.com/ and...
Small Dog Electronicshttp://www.smalldog.com | Refurbished
You know what? Spam or no-Spam, off-list or on. This List has gotten
very tiresome this past week I don't need my email clogged up with 40
part discussions on email propriety or geek debates on Apple and
Microsoft politics. I thought this was a better alternative to slogging
through message
Off-list is where off-topic emails are supposed to migrate. Now you're
trying tell us that is no longer acceptable? Regardless of how
offensive a conversation might get, sometimes things need saying. Plus,
how do you decide what's offensive? Do you say that it's foul language,
angry
On Monday 03 November 2003 7:23 pm, Joe wrote:
A guy I work with, offered me a lombard 333 Mhz Laaptop for $100-125, is
this a good deal? don't these go for like $800?
Unless it's stolen or there's something very wrong with it, that is a very,
very good deal. I feel lucky that I got my
vicki wrote:
Hi all
Does this really have to go on for much longer because I am really tired of
it now.
To unsubscribe, email: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Thanks all and good-bye!!!
--
Alan Miller
Underwater Photographer°°.°.°.°.
http://home.earthlink.net/~uwphoto/
9600/233
On 3-Nov-03, at 12:45 PM, Hamlin Krewson wrote:
And at least two of us thing Laurent is overreacting. Just because I
send an off-list off-topic email to one list member does not mean I'm
spamming. If it turns into an off-list flame-war between myself and
the listmember, then that's my problem
On Monday, November 3, 2003, at 12:53 pm, G-Books wrote:
Has anybody else (in the US) ran into this?
I just installed iTunes 4.1, and when I started iTunes and went to the
Music Store, I got a message saying that the iTunes Music Store is not
yet available in your country. Huh!? Since when is it
At 2:40 PM -0800 03/11/03, Steve wrote:
This list is a good, open forum. I've been on several of Dan's lists
(and others) for many years now, and frankly, this one is one of the
most enjoyable. I particularly liked the recipe for black-eyed peas
that showed a while back - great example of an
Can you please(please, please) have this discussion off-list?
Thank you all
Marc
That's the funniest thing I think I've ever read on this list! Let
me email you privately to relay my kudos! :-P
All joking aside, I'd just like to point out that the PowerBooks list
seems to run extremely
At 15:20 -0500 on 11/3/03, you (Laurent Daudelin), wrote:
I'm sorry, but I don't read the rules like you do. Using the email address
that are freely available to other list members to send improper/nasty
emails is the same than harvesting email addresses to spam people. People
are joining
On 3-Nov-03, at 4:40 PM, Andrew Kershaw wrote:
In the last month or so on G-Books, I've seen more OT discussion and
flame wars than I've seen on PowerBooks in four years
I don't really want to continue this thread, but I also don't want to
see G-books get maligned. I've been on this list for
On 3-Nov-03, at 3:35 PM, Bill Briggs wrote:
This is a fantastic recipe. The result is a meal in pan. If you like
cornbread this will wake up your tastebuds like no other you've ever
eaten. (If you're not partial to hot food, just decrease the number
of jalapeños or leave them out altogether.)
If
At 2:10 PM +0100 11/3/03, Michelle Klein-Hass wrote:
On Monday 03 November 2003 7:23 pm, Joe wrote:
A guy I work with, offered me a lombard 333 Mhz Laaptop for $100-125, is
this a good deal? don't these go for like $800?
Unless it's stolen or there's something very wrong with it, that is a
On Monday, November 3, 2003, at 03:38 PM, Mitch Hogg wrote:
I don't see offensive anywhere in his original post. Just e-mails,
the
phrase back and forth, which would indicate the exchange was
bilateral and
therefore not unsolicited, and the suggestion that sending said emails
privately is
On Monday, November 3, 2003, at 03:47 PM, Laurent Daudelin wrote:
Ok, come guys, you're all grown-up, aren't you? You know what I'm
talking
about when I mention nasty, improper or insulting, don't you
So, nobody on this list really care if they start receiving OFFENSIVE
emails? Well, I do
On Monday, November 3, 2003, at 08:27 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm just a subscriber here, not the nanny, but I totally agree with
Laurent.
As nanny, he sets the tone and enforces the rules.
You are correct that Laurent enforces the rules. Anyone who breaks
the list rules in a posting
on 11/4/03 0:07, Steve Moody at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
When I grow up, I can start planning my second childhood.
Hurry up!
Tom
--
G-Books is sponsored by http://lowendmac.com/ and...
Small Dog Electronicshttp://www.smalldog.com | Refurbished Drives |
-- Check our web site
So, happily making a filter (Eudora 6--but as I recall, it works in
earlier versions, too) that screens for improper off-list emails in
the subject line and deletes them, I say good-by to the topic.
Jeez--this was as bad as a debate between fundamentalist protestants
and atheists.
--
G-Books
54 matches
Mail list logo
