This has just been contributed to the Apache Camel project:
https://github.com/apache/camel/pull/393
and it will be added to the Camel wiki shortly.
It would be helpful to get feedback from any Java or Camel users who may
want to try it.
I'm using ganglia to submit data directly to a carbon server with use with
Graphite/Grafana. It works great, but I'm having issues understanding
granularity of the data. It seems like my data comes in at a rate equal to
the polling interval I set in the gmetad.conf's 'data_source' attribute.
The
You should change polling rate in your gmetad.conf
Date: Thu, 12 Feb 2015 16:52:13 -0500
From: vli...@veus.hr
To: ganglia-general@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [Ganglia-general] collect_every vs gmetad polling?
collect_every manages how often gmond
sends out
That makes a lot more sense. What do the gmond's do if they have more than
one sample before gmetad polls it?
Brad H
On Thu, Feb 12, 2015 at 4:52 PM, Vladimir Vuksan vli...@veus.hr wrote:
collect_every manages how often gmond sends out particular metric to
other gmond(s). It is completely
Hi Brad,
The standard rate of polling interval is 15 second.
If you want to increase it you should define the data sources as the following:
data_source 10 cluster_name host1 host2...
10 means the polling interval is 10 seconds for this cluster.
Thanks
Sent from Samsung Mobile.
div
I realize that. But if I set the polling rate to say 60 seconds (or any
value) in gmetad then the gmond setting collect_every doesn't seem to do
anything. I can set it to any value and it still collects at 60 second
interval. I guess my question is what does collect_every actually do?
On
collect_every manages how often gmond
sends out particular metric to other gmond(s). It is completely
independent of gmetad.
Vladimir
On 02/12/2015 04:39 PM, Brad Hough wrote:
I realize that. But if I set the polling rate to say
60
7 matches
Mail list logo
