Re: [Ganglia-general] Gmetad-to-Gmetad connection

2015-03-25 Thread Sergey
Hi Vladimir,

I changed to “scalable on”. I didn’t help.
What I see is only the common remote grid view:

CPUs Total: 120 
Hosts up: 16
Hosts down:2
==
Current Load Avg (15, 5, 1m):
  3%, 3%, 3%
Avg Utilization (last hour):
  4%
Localtime:
  2015-03-25 10:27
===
I can’t see any clusters and hosts inside this grid.
By netstat I can see that the second Gmetad instance on machine2 periodically 
connects to the machine1:8651.
I don’t see any connections to machine1:8652.

The second Gmetad instance has the same ports, but it’s on another machine. Did 
you mean that it can affect the polling process?

Any ideas?

Thanks!
Sergey

 On Mar 24, 2015, at 6:51 PM, Vladimir Vuksan vli...@veus.hr wrote:
 
 Hi Sergey,
 
 Try setting
 
 scalable on
 
 in gmetad.conf of the second instance. From the stock gmetad.conf
 
 # Scalability mode. If on, we summarize over downstream grids, and respect
 # authority tags. If off, we take on 2.5.0-era behavior: we do not wrap our 
 output
 # in GRID/GRID tags, we ignore all GRID tags we see, and always assume
 # we are the authority on data source feeds. This approach does not scale to
 # large groups of clusters, but is provided for backwards compatibility.
 # default: on
 # scalable off
 
 I have not used this feature in a long time so not sure how well it scales 
 however it's worth a shot.
 
 Does second instance have different interactive and xml ports ?
 
 Vladimir
 
 
 On 03/24/2015 09:24 PM, Sergey wrote:
 I have one Gmetad instance collecting metrics from several clusters of 
 hosts. Then the second Gmetad instance has to pool all data via port 8651 
 from the first instance and store everything in local RRDS.
 I can get all data from the second machine via “#nc machine1 8651”, but 
 when I check RRDS, I don’t see any clusters, only Summary_Data folder.
 Why Gmetad doesn’t write data into RRDS?
 
 

--
Dive into the World of Parallel Programming The Go Parallel Website, sponsored
by Intel and developed in partnership with Slashdot Media, is your hub for all
things parallel software development, from weekly thought leadership blogs to
news, videos, case studies, tutorials and more. Take a look and join the 
conversation now. http://goparallel.sourceforge.net/___
Ganglia-general mailing list
Ganglia-general@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ganglia-general


Re: [Ganglia-general] Gmetad-to-Gmetad connection

2015-03-25 Thread Sergey

I changed the second Gmetad to scalable off” and it works!

Thank you!


Sergey

 On Mar 25, 2015, at 1:48 PM, Vladimir Vuksan vladi...@vuksan.com wrote:
 
 I might have misspoke try scalable off. 
 
 On March 25, 2015 4:26:55 PM EDT, Sergey svin...@apple.com wrote:
 Hi Vladimir,
 
 I changed to “scalable on”. I didn’t help.
 What I see is only the common remote grid view:
 
 CPUs Total: 120   
 Hosts up: 16  
 Hosts down:2  
 ==
 Current Load Avg (15, 5, 1m):
  nb sp;3%, 3%, 3%
 Avg Utilization (last hour):
   4%
 Localtime:
   2015-03-25 10:27
 ===
 I can’t see any clusters and hosts inside this grid.
 By netstat I can see that the second Gmetad instance on machine2 periodically 
 connects to the machine1:8651.
 I don’t see any connections to machine1:8652.
 
 The second Gmetad instance has the same ports, but it’s on another machine. 
 Did you mean that it can affect the polling process?
 
 Any ideas?
 
 Thanks!
 Sergey
 
 On Mar 24, 2015, at 6:51 PM, Vladimir Vuksan vli...@veus.hr 
 mailto:vli...@veus.hr wrote:
 
 Hi Sergey,
 
 Try setting
 
 scalable on
 
 in gmetad.conf of the second instance. From the stock gmetad.conf
 
 # Scalability mode. If on, we summarize over downstream grids, and respect
 # authority tags. If off, we take on 2.5.0-era behavior: we do not wrap our 
 output
 # in GRID/GRID tags, we ignore all GRID tags we see, and always assume
 # we are the authority on d ata source feeds. This approach does not scale 
 to
 # large groups of clusters, but is provided for backwards compatibility.
 # default: on
 # scalable off
 
 I have not used this feature in a long time so not sure how well it scales 
 however it's worth a shot.
 
 Does second instance have different interactive and xml ports ?
 
 Vladimir
 
 
 On 03/24/2015 09:24 PM, Sergey wrote:
 I have one Gmetad instance collecting metrics from several clusters of 
 hosts. Then the second Gmetad instance has to pool all data via port 8651 
 from the first instance and store everything in local RRDS.
 I can get all data from the second machine via “#nc machine1 8651”, but 
 when I check RRDS, I don’t see any clusters, only Summary_Data folder.
 Why Gmetad doesn’t wr ite data into RRDS?
 
 
 
 
 -- 
 Vladimir

--
Dive into the World of Parallel Programming The Go Parallel Website, sponsored
by Intel and developed in partnership with Slashdot Media, is your hub for all
things parallel software development, from weekly thought leadership blogs to
news, videos, case studies, tutorials and more. Take a look and join the 
conversation now. http://goparallel.sourceforge.net/___
Ganglia-general mailing list
Ganglia-general@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ganglia-general


Re: [Ganglia-general] Gmetad-to-Gmetad connection

2015-03-24 Thread Vladimir Vuksan
Hi Sergey,

Try setting

scalable on

in gmetad.conf of the second instance. From the stock gmetad.conf

# Scalability mode. If on, we summarize over downstream grids, and respect
# authority tags. If off, we take on 2.5.0-era behavior: we do not wrap 
our output
# in GRID/GRID tags, we ignore all GRID tags we see, and always assume
# we are the authority on data source feeds. This approach does not 
scale to
# large groups of clusters, but is provided for backwards compatibility.
# default: on
# scalable off

I have not used this feature in a long time so not sure how well it 
scales however it's worth a shot.

Does second instance have different interactive and xml ports ?

Vladimir


On 03/24/2015 09:24 PM, Sergey wrote:
 I have one Gmetad instance collecting metrics from several clusters of hosts. 
 Then the second Gmetad instance has to pool all data via port 8651 from the 
 first instance and store everything in local RRDS.
 I can get all data from the second machine via “#nc machine1 8651”, but when 
 I check RRDS, I don’t see any clusters, only Summary_Data folder.
 Why Gmetad doesn’t write data into RRDS?



--
Dive into the World of Parallel Programming The Go Parallel Website, sponsored
by Intel and developed in partnership with Slashdot Media, is your hub for all
things parallel software development, from weekly thought leadership blogs to
news, videos, case studies, tutorials and more. Take a look and join the 
conversation now. http://goparallel.sourceforge.net/
___
Ganglia-general mailing list
Ganglia-general@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ganglia-general