On Wed, Jun 09, 2010 at 12:11:01PM -0700, Mark Mitchell wrote:
I think that literate programming approaches (whether the full Knuth
version, or the more mild JavaDoc version, or auto-extraction of
command-line options or whatever) are valuable. RMS, based on my
communications with him, is
Basile Starynkevitch wrote:
Meanwhile, I think we should try to make use of the fact that RMS is
permitting auto-generated reference documentation (which I have been
instructed not to call a manual) using JavaDoc/Doxygen tools. If we use
those tools, and demonstrate their value, we're then
On Wed, Jun 09, 2010 at 10:46:26PM +0200, Basile Starynkevitch wrote:
Please also explain who should I contact, and how? Please also explain
how the GNU Emacs is generated. I guess it is by a software of the GNU
emacs package.
Sorry for the typo, I mean
how the GNU emacs documentation is
On Wed, Jun 09, 2010 at 01:57:03PM -0700, Mark Mitchell wrote:
Basile Starynkevitch wrote:
Meanwhile, I think we should try to make use of the fact that RMS is
permitting auto-generated reference documentation (which I have been
instructed not to call a manual) using JavaDoc/Doxygen
Basile Starynkevitch wrote:
So I still don't understand why generating cross-reference
documentation with Doxygen for C++ code is permitted, while
generating cross-reference documentation witb ÂMELT for MELT code is
prohibited.
As far as I know, nobody said that.
